That was a great discussion of revolvers. I like the part at 7:05 where he says if you are carrying a semi-auto without one in the chamber you probably should be carrying a revolver.Here’s a year old but goodie. DB always shares good info!
S2E8 What’s a Revolver Good For? | The Firearm Trainer Podcast
www.firearmtrainerpodcast.com
I am hosting DB and Bryan Eastridge at a HITs class at a Riley in August. solid guy.That was a great discussion of revolvers. I like the part at 7:05 where he says if you are carrying a semi-auto without one in the chamber you probably should be carrying a revolver.
Very nice rendition. I too am a revolver lover. I have many semi's but for some reason or another, I gravitate to my kimber K6S. It's simplicity and "ready for action" attitude makes it my favorite EDC. They have an new aluminum version coming out, but I think the heaviness and very nice trigger of the current K6S will remain on my side.So as not to derail a different thread (further) I figured I'd just start a new one and lay out my reasoning a bit on why the answer is "no". As many of you know, I investigate people shot/stabbed/robbed blah blah blah and have for years real world experience impressive resume blah blah blah. So, here's my take away.
If revolvers suck, there should be a statistical difference in who won and lost a gun fight based on who had a revolver and who did not. I have seen no such statistic in my cases. People armed with revolvers tend to prevail as often as their counterparts armed with semi-autos. Why?
Well, because capacity is seldom a deciding factor. I've said it time and time again, but one side runs out of time before either side runs out of ammo in the vast majority of cases. One side or the other is injured and flees, is scared and flees, or is incapacitated and...well, just sort of lays there usually. Even in cases where more than 5-6 shots were fired, it rarely changes the outcome. They are shooting at someone who is fleeing (and often didn't START shooting until the person was fleeing). They are shooting and missing. They are shooting at someone who's already incapacitated and their brain hasn't caught up to the fact the other guy is down and out of the fight just yet.
Next up, is when did a revolver fail and a pistol would have prevailed or vice versa. I can tell you that the shooter's worst enemy is the thumb safety. I have had way more people fail to disengage the thumb safety and get victimized while pulling a dead trigger than have ever died with an empty gun of any kind. Those people would have done better with a revolver. I can think of one incident where the first shot hit the floor plate of the guy's magazine, dumping his cartridges. A revolver would have still been functional, but I think he would have still lost because he got stitched up too fast to react even if he'd had an uzi in his hand.
On the flip side is the myth the revolver is more reliable. Folks, these days if your semi-auto won't run 500-1k rounds with zero maintenance and feed any HP bullet out there then you bought a crap gun. Revolvers can and do fail, but are simpler to maintain. A (no thumb safety) pistol is just as likely to go bang, though.
So, in most real world applications I don't see a significant difference between a revolver and a pistol. Is it the best? Probably not, but few people really carry the "best" as opposed to "the best compromise". Based on what I've seen my recommendations for Mr/Mrs Generic Gun Toter would be:
1) No thumb safety pistol
2) Revolver
3) 1911 style thumb safety equipped pistol
4) Any other thumb safety equipped pistol
And learn to employ it quickly and with the element of surprise...which is significantly more important than weapon selection (as long as you can make it go bang every time...which all to often doesn't happen with a safety equipped gun under stress).
I've been tempted to get a K6S, but i'm hesitant because of the maker. I've had several 1911's made by them that were pure garbage.Very nice rendition. I too am a revolver lover. I have many semi's but for some reason or another, I gravitate to my kimber K6S. It's simplicity and "ready for action" attitude makes it my favorite EDC. They have an new aluminum version coming out, but I think the heaviness and very nice trigger of the current K6S will remain on my side.
My dad was the same way until he tried my Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan. Now he loves his wheelgunI was a semi-auto elitist until I shot my g-father's .30 carbine Ruger Blackhawk. That's just a fun gun to shoot. Then, the .38 didn't seem so bad. It even felt ergonomic. Natural. I've even carried it a few times.
Revolvers don't suck, but they are different. Like any tool, they have a place in the toolbox. You just have to know how to use it.
I picked up a 2" version about 6 months ago. It's been perfect and I liked it so much I sold my 340PD. I'll probably pick up a 4" version if I find one gently used.I've been tempted to get a K6S, but i'm hesitant because of the maker. I've had several 1911's made by them that were pure garbage.
I've heard nothing but good things about their revolvers though. I have Smiths, Rugers and Colt revolvers and they've all be excellent.
Interesting, that's saying a lot if you sold your 340PD in favor of the K6S. What was your reasoning?I picked up a 2" version about 6 months ago. It's been perfect and I liked it so much I sold my 340PD. I'll probably pick up a 4" version if I find one gently used.
I really sort of like the 3” TLE K6 but would like to shoot one a little before I commit. Used S&W revolvers since 1986 so sort of hard to switchPrimarily because I was consistently more accurate with the Kimber for both 38 & 357. I don't pocket carry so the weight wasn't an issue. I sold the 340 for quite a bit more than I paid for the Kimber so that worked out well.
If my eyesight was still good I would have already bought one.A new stainless 4 inch Python is tempting me.