You cannot tell me in good faith, that in 100% of encounters 5 or 6 rounds get's the job done. You are claiming people run out of time in "nearly" every situation. Nearly, on average, or statistically do not apply to every circumstance. We do not know if, when, or what kind of circumstance we will fine ourselves in. Throw a criminal or two into the mix that are amped up on narcotics or psychopathic into the mix and it's likely all your statistics will go out the window. I do not know if there is a right or wrong answer here. I just know that when I get up to walk out of the house in the morning I try to leave as prepared as I can, because I do not know what the day has in store for me.
By that logic, everyone should be carrying ARs or AKs with 5 backup mags.
The reality is, people will carry what they feel comfortable carrying. Be it Semi-Auto pistol, or revolver. BOTH, yes BOTH are compromises.
I am thinking 45 ACP, because it kills the souls as well.
Not out of a two inch barrel.
I am thinking 45 ACP, because it kills the souls as well.
Yes and a 1911 would also go quite nicely with a bike!I love my SW Model 66 for open carrying when I ride my motorcycle (custom wood grips and all). There is just something about bikes and revolvers.
Except that I read how some cops died reloading because they bothered to empty their cylinders like they do in at the range instead of just banging them out on the ground and getting to reloading quicker. So as you train so goes it under stress with muscle memory it seems. I confess to also saving my brass because I get special offers for sending brass back to my ammo supplier.Good post. Revolvers are the best guns for reloaders, one of my favorite aspects is not having to chase brass, and you have a much larger working window with respect to ammo.
Dang necro post, deserves a necro reply.So as not to derail a different thread (further) I figured I'd just start a new one and lay out my reasoning a bit on why the answer is "no". As many of you know, I investigate people shot/stabbed/robbed blah blah blah and have for years real world experience impressive resume blah blah blah. So, here's my take away.
If revolvers suck, there should be a statistical difference in who won and lost a gun fight based on who had a revolver and who did not. I have seen no such statistic in my cases. People armed with revolvers tend to prevail as often as their counterparts armed with semi-autos. Why?
Well, because capacity is seldom a deciding factor. I've said it time and time again, but one side runs out of time before either side runs out of ammo in the vast majority of cases. One side or the other is injured and flees, is scared and flees, or is incapacitated and...well, just sort of lays there usually. Even in cases where more than 5-6 shots were fired, it rarely changes the outcome. They are shooting at someone who is fleeing (and often didn't START shooting until the person was fleeing). They are shooting and missing. They are shooting at someone who's already incapacitated and their brain hasn't caught up to the fact the other guy is down and out of the fight just yet.
Next up, is when did a revolver fail and a pistol would have prevailed or vice versa. I can tell you that the shooter's worst enemy is the thumb safety. I have had way more people fail to disengage the thumb safety and get victimized while pulling a dead trigger than have ever died with an empty gun of any kind. Those people would have done better with a revolver. I can think of one incident where the first shot hit the floor plate of the guy's magazine, dumping his cartridges. A revolver would have still been functional, but I think he would have still lost because he got stitched up too fast to react even if he'd had an uzi in his hand.
On the flip side is the myth the revolver is more reliable. Folks, these days if your semi-auto won't run 500-1k rounds with zero maintenance and feed any HP bullet out there then you bought a crap gun. Revolvers can and do fail, but are simpler to maintain. A (no thumb safety) pistol is just as likely to go bang, though.
So, in most real world applications I don't see a significant difference between a revolver and a pistol. Is it the best? Probably not, but few people really carry the "best" as opposed to "the best compromise". Based on what I've seen my recommendations for Mr/Mrs Generic Gun Toter would be:
1) No thumb safety pistol
2) Revolver
3) 1911 style thumb safety equipped pistol
4) Any other thumb safety equipped pistol
And learn to employ it quickly and with the element of surprise...which is significantly more important than weapon selection (as long as you can make it go bang every time...which all to often doesn't happen with a safety equipped gun under stress).
The brass in pockets myth was dispelled. The actual after action reports in Newhall discounted that as there was no brass found in any CHP pockets. It is believed the myth started in squad rooms by folks running with their own speculation of what happened!Except that I read how some cops died reloading because they bothered to empty their cylinders like they do in at the range instead of just banging them out on the ground and getting to reloading quicker. So as you train so goes it under stress with muscle memory it seems. I confess to also saving my brass because I get special offers for sending brass back to my ammo supplier.
Welp, only gotta read “15 PAGES”…I came here to leave a reply. Now I am not of what I may be replying to. I like revolvers. Been shooting them for more than 50 years. They work pretty much like any other gun: you do your job, the gun will do its job.
Post #1 says all I need to hear from him, you either believe him or you don’t. And till I have reason to believe otherwise it works for me. JMO, I’m guessing you may be of the same mind. But I’m married and I’m wrong most every day.Somewhere @BehindBlueI's has posted some statistics. I cannot remember where it was posted though.
Do revolver suck? – In some ways yes. In some ways no.
Are revolvers enough? – Sometimes yes. Sometimes no.
If revolvers were perfect semi autos would never have been developed.
If semi autos were perfect, revolvers would have fallen into disuse.
Mas had a good video on this a couple of days ago: