Trump 2024 — The second term

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • HKFaninCarmel

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jul 7, 2019
    857
    63
    Carmel
    I believe:

    There is only one guy that ever stood up to the left, there are not any other choices, this is the pony we must ride.

    So folks can nit pick all they want, I’m sure that is very helpful to our enemies…
    So because you have convinced yourself that only Trump is "standing up to left" you are making it clear that you will mindlessly follow him into any position or stance, from "take the guns first" to supporting CCP control of propaganda apps?

    1710337729421.png
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    I believe:

    That another four years of what we have now will forever end the possibility of being a constitutional based country.

    There is only one guy that ever stood up to the left, there are not any other choices, this is the pony we must ride.

    So folks can nit pick all they want, I’m sure that is very helpful to our enemies…
    While there may be some not everything is simply nit picking. Tell me this, would it not be a bit eyebrow raising to you if what @SheepDog4Life posted were about DeSantis?
     
    Last edited:

    Destro

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 10, 2011
    3,905
    113
    The Khyber Pass
    So because you have convinced yourself that only Trump is "standing up to left" you are making it clear that you will mindlessly follow him into any position or stance, from "take the guns first" to supporting CCP control of propaganda apps?

    View attachment 339711
    The talking points for "why you don't need a bumpstock" are in an earlier chapter.
     

    SheepDog4Life

    Natural Gray Man
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    May 14, 2016
    5,319
    113
    SW IN
    I'm seeing more and more discussion in legal circles about the Molly Hemmingway "Fruit of the poisonous tree" article in the federalist that @Ingomike posted recently involving the illegally recorded Ga. phone call that appears to be the triggering centerpiece of the indictment which could have a serious impact on DA Fani Willis's case if it is ruled inadmissible by ill-gotten means.




    I haven't been following this very closely as I feel it, like the majority of the shameful cases against Trump, are "Trump-only" prosecutions, *** persecutions. (like I've indicated multiple times, I think the secure documents and obstruction of subpoena case is the only legitimate prosecution)

    Was the transcript of the call also only from the illegal recording? If so, flush the whole case.

    And, to re-iterate after the previous discussion, I'm not one who thinks "find the votes" is a smoking gun to manufacture fraudulent votes... doesn't even approach "and Pence gavels Trump re-elected".

    There you go again.
    ETA: Lol!

    @Ingomike "I dont know but I am confident that that there is some tactical reason we don’t know and we likely will never know. But you ALWAYS choose the worst interpretation when it involves Trump."

    There is a flipside to someone always choosing negative interpretations which is the other side flipping it seems to always choose positive interpretations to run cover, dismiss and never question why.

    Can you imagine what the INGO GP watercooler talk would be if the implications of what you posted were about DeSantis and a newly rekindled love affair with CfG.

    Yup, goose-gander, turn-about-fairplay and all that.

    I guess the argument now is that it's too late to bring any negativity to light. Trump will be the nominee and we gotta run with what we have in the general.
    I disagree... and am not part of that "we".

    Trump banished me and others when we refused to kiss his *** ring so **** him, let him dance with the ones that brought him.

    Know what time it is. Stop going hmmm... and get with the positive.
    What time is it? There is no candidate for president acceptable to me to receive my vote... not Trump, not Biden, not Kennedy.

    I'll pass come November on the Presidential ballot.

    And remember, y'all voted for this...
     
    Last edited:

    DadSmith

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Oct 21, 2018
    22,718
    113
    Ripley County

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,914
    113
    Mitchell

    SheepDog4Life

    Natural Gray Man
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    May 14, 2016
    5,319
    113
    SW IN

    Is Rand wrong or Wong?
    Dunno. Just reporting differing points of view.
    Rand marches to the beat of a different drummer... Bless him... and I'm glad he does because I would prefer "misses" on the big C Constitution side rather than vice versa... but in this case I think he is wrong, or at the very least, misguided. If the bill had anything to do with "content", then yes, it would be a 1A issue. It doesn't and it's not.

    It is solely about ownership and very specifically about ownership by individuals and entities identified in the law as "foreign adversaries"... so I think he's misguided on any "takings" implications as well. That some multi-billionaires have sunk boatloads of money into a CCP controlled venture, well I think this has been brewing for so long that "Caveat emptor" applies.

    JMO.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,140
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Kids spend a lot more time on Instagram. They are not wanting to stop Tik Tok because it is brainwashing kids. They say it is because the app can steal info from phones. It can't do that if you do not use it.

    The first Amendment covers our people having the right to watch that nonsense and be "brainwashed" if they so desire.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,140
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Had the shoe been on the other foot and Biden uttered "we need to find 17,000" votes to a Democrat SoS... would that have been hunkie-dorie with the INGO majority? Or would it be deemed nefarious?

    I think we know the answer... hence, duplicity.
    If, as you fail to mention in Trump's case, that hypothetical democrat politician had raised concerns about voting irregularities, the validity of which could be easily determined, and asked for an examination of said claims in order to find more legitimate votes, they would be on sound grounds to make such a request

    Yeah, there's duplicity here. Check the mirror
     

    Shadow01

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 8, 2011
    3,363
    119
    WCIn
    Ya’ll will have bulging eyeballs when they declare Joe as your next 4 year daddy. The thieves have this in the bag because everyone else can’t bring themselves to go against the establishment.
     

    rhamersley

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 9, 2016
    3,737
    113
    Danville
    Top Bottom