Name one thing that you can have an unlimited amount of that doesn't turn into a bad thing.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Democrats want to Legalize Marijuana
- Thread starter Doug
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
When you overdose on the weed. The effects are horrible and gruesome.
You make a sandwich and take a nap.
I'm a law abiding non pot smoking person.
If it were 100% legal in everyway with out affecting my other rights and I wouldn't lose my job I'd pick up smoking it...or otherwise consuming it.
When our ancestors outlawed alcohol they rightly understood they need to amend the constitution to do so. It also took another amendment to legalize alcohol again. It is a proof of how little we value the constitution compared to them that we arrogantly just pass laws that restrict freedoms whenever the mood hits.
Every single one of my drug owi arrests this year denied being under the influence. Every single mj owi denied feeling high. None of them attributed their poor coordination and driving behavior to the drug. Alcohol owis usually admitted that they "knew it was dangerous/had a little too much/made a bad choice" but decided to drive anyway.
It actually looks a lot like a stimulant/ hallucinogen overdose right up until they go catatonic. Haven't seen a death yet though.
THC edibles and vapes arent your college bong party.
From WebMD
So, if 'toxic' is what you meant, then the answer is yes. If lethal is what you were angling at, no one has done it yet
I would hesitate to declare it impossible. Alcohol poisoning is rare outside of fraternity style high intake binge drinking. Similar rapid intake overdose may be possible with THC although since it is not a CNS depressant it would seem less likely - but almost anything can kill you in high enough doses
Holcomb says he won't do it. A Republican legislature won't push it.
Democrats can propose something that doesn't have a snowball's chance of succeeding. Maybe they can gain some more followers (or just gain loyalty) from the pot-head and gimme cultures. They never really have to pass or do anything and they get to sew divisiveness. What do they have to lose?
It seems like an obvious all-around win for the D's. It also seems like a pretty weak play from a worn out book.
Air. I'm definitely going with air.
Second is p***y. That would be assuming that it is ever available in an unlimited amount.
Sorry, had to do it. Been a rough week.
Timjoebillybob
Grandmaster
- Feb 27, 2009
- 9,387
- 149
Water is safe except.. O2 is safe except..
I've heard of overdosing but not deaths, usually very young kids who got into their parents gummies.
You seem to think that just because some people on here agree with legalization that they are suddenly start voting dem?
So obviously there is a way to identify mj intoxication if it was legal. Delta-8 THC is legal in IN, they sell CBD vape pens that contain high levels of it. Along with gummies. Only Delta-9 is illegal.
I would say, rather, that legalizing it is another step out onto the slippery slope of decadence
We are having the same arguments now about rioting and burning property. In some districts those crimes will not be prosecuted even if arrests are made - does that mean those arrests should not be made?
I concede the argument that puffing is not nearly as dangerous as burning and looting, but where and when do we draw the line about when it is just too much bother to enforce certain laws. I am uncomfortable with the idea of the lawbreakers getting to make that decision and move that line
I've interacted with people on this site for whom gayness was more important than RKBA and who voted accordingly
Are you saying you DON'T think there are people for whom the Right to Keep Bonging Acapulco gold wouldn't influence them to vote Democratic if they thought it would get them what they want?
What percentage of support for libertarians do you think is weed based?
Faith
Yes, there is a marked improvement with the "after" picture.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
I'm not saying either is "safe". Both are intoxicants and can be misused and abused. Having seen first hand the effects of alcohol on a life long alcoholic and through extensive personal experimentation with everything from psychedelics to opiates in my teens and early 20s I can say without a doubt its easier to reach the point of incoherence/ incompacitation with alcohol than just about anything. Also the argument that pot is a gateway drug is false. The first thing I smoked was a cigarette. The first time I got intoxicated was from alcohol. The escalation was more do to the people and places I found myself associated with and my personal choices. I made a choice at one point to stop doing drugs and change my life for the better. The only thing I still struggle with is nicotine. I've not been totally able to stop smoking even now. But smoking a joint vs drinking it all depends on what and how much but being high vs drunk the high person is much less likely to hurt anyone else. Thus "safer". I still drink a beer now and then and have a glass of whiskey once or twice a week. But I'm not leaving my house afterwards. I don't do anything else anymore because I have more to lose now and I love my family to much to put them through the legal trouble associated with pot. I don't know if I'd smoke again if it was legal probably not but I believe in self control and moderation. If you can't control yourself you shouldn't drink or smoke anything. But even you an or if you can't control yourself (not implying that you can't) its not your place to try to control the actions of other either.
Just because someone doesn't like it, doesn't mean it should be illegal for everyone else.
Last edited:
Out of curiosity, when someone is pulled over for impaired driving and they are high but not drunk, how is this prosecuted? Drunk is pretty easy to understand as the breathalyzer gives a number and statutes are written around those numbers. I'm not aware of anything like this for MJ though.
Site Supporter
Members online
- STFU
- smittygj
- morve80
- Ghostface
- jamil
- ArevaloSocom
- gds
- F1Fanatic
- Titanium_Frost
- Dirtebiker
- jjohnson878
- PowderApe
- rcs36
- DJM95B
- fullmetaljesus
- 700 LTR 223
- Waldojr
- Lee9
- indiucky
- Ingomike
- Rafterman
- sapper83
- tribeofham
- KMaC
- TheGrumpyGuy
- Big Hank
- Crash7
- brchixwing
- GLOCKBOY
- printcraft
- dwain
- z0mb13_m0nk3y
- bigdaddy1427
- miguel
- DeadeyeChrista'sdad
- Bookmark
- typarker
- peterock
- blain
- Gunguy317
- Born2vette
- indyblue
- tjones
- oldschool1911
- sendelweck
- Zephri
- erasure
- K9stang
- Dookie
- X3r0h0uR
