Stock Market is ROCKING

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • asevans

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Feb 26, 2011
    508
    63
    Notice how the banks go under on a Friday. Just like in the FDIC meeting where they said that would be the ideal situation.
    That way they can control the flow of information and prevent bank runs.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,087
    113
    North Central
    How, EXACTLY, is this comment productive - in any way???

    You attack a portion of my post. I'm fine with that. IF I wrong I am very willing to learn.

    But you don't go into any detail(s) whatsoever regarding how specifically I am wrong. Why not? Please use your words and be detailed on how exactly our banks do not operate to serve their own financial interests and are not mostly independent to serve those needs?

    Regards,

    Doug
    Do you really believe that “Our banks operate almost entirely on a self-centered capitalist agenda. They are, for the most part, completely independent entities. They must follow government regulations but are otherwise free to operate as they wish.”?

    They are far from free. Maybe it should have been purple to denote sarcasm…
     

    Libertarian01

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jan 12, 2009
    6,015
    113
    Fort Wayne
    Do you really believe that “Our banks operate almost entirely on a self-centered capitalist agenda. They are, for the most part, completely independent entities. They must follow government regulations but are otherwise free to operate as they wish.”?

    They are far from free. Maybe it should have been purple to denote sarcasm…

    I did acknowledge that there ARE rules and regulations. I do NOT dispute that. There were rules in the Code of Hammurabi. There were rules in Ancient Persian, Greece, Rome. The Hittites had rules regarding money lending and protecting assets dating back 3,700 years ago. See the Code of Nesilim dating back to 1,670 BC. If you're implying that banks have at sometime been "purely free" of regulation which of us is not living in the real world?

    So long as there has been money lenders, debtors, and places to store money the government has had laws.

    OUR banks are free from being legally forced to do something. In Europe most of the governments directly own a portion of their banks can and do compel them to make loans that American banks would balk at. Not so here. It is my understanding that in China the government basically runs the whole show, so they are most definitely not free.

    Here are banks are owned by stockholders, run by elected boards, and generally serve their own financial interests while providing a service to the community. Very few other governments around the world allow such autonomy. To whom, exactly, are you comparing our banks with as not "being free?" I suggest there is no system more free than ours. Prove me wrong. Please! I would love to learn more.

    Regards,

    Doug
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,517
    149
    Indiana
    Bank of America looks to be in trouble.

    Down more than 20.28%

    They have problems other than US Treasury holdings. AT-1 bonds. They had billions in them last December(202 billion according to an EU report in December). Given no one thought they were at risk they likely still had them during the UBS deal. They also have a very large commercial realestate problem,with many loans currently failing(late,flat defaults,and no buyers of commercial spaces they actually own,even poor lease performances). Expect full blown media support though,as they are ESG,LGBTQ+, and CRT approved.

    BoFA stock was falling before SVB's failure...pretty steadily since the 7th. It is the second largest US bank. I doubt they would let it fail,even if they needed to pump 1 trillion into it to keep it alive,but who knows.

    HSBC had loads of them(At-1) as well.


    https://www.barrons.com/articles/bank-of-america-stock-price-bond-losses-5a203a66 (this article is about US Treasury bonds).

    Who know what will happen though. Back room deals are certainly being done(JPMorgan and First Republic for example).

    The ECB and Bank of England are doing everything they can at this point to calm AT-1 markets, going as far as claiming the Swiss government was wrong. The Swiss are already being sued by AT-1 bond holders(including companies like Pimco). It has not worked so far judging by yesterday and Asian trading this morning. Some are still buying them,but rates are all over the place. Some AT-1 bank bonds have jumped from 8% to 19% in two days(Deutsche bank).



    I am not sure that will have the effect they intended.
     
    Last edited:

    ditcherman

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Dec 18, 2018
    7,818
    113
    In the country, hopefully.

    Quick little primer for us mere mortals trying to follow along (maybe it's just me).

    WHAT IS AN AT1 BOND?​

    AT1 bonds - a $275 billion sector also known as "contingent convertibles" or "CoCo" bonds - act as shock absorbers if a bank's capital levels fall below a certain threshold. They can be converted into equity or written off.
    They make up part of the capital cushion that regulators require banks to hold to provide support in times of market turmoil.

    They are the riskiest type of bond a bank can issue and so carry a higher coupon.

    If AT1s are converted into equity, this supports a bank's balance sheet and helps it to stay afloat. They also pave the way for a "bail-in", or a way for banks to transfer risks to investors and away from taxpayers if they get into trouble.

    WHAT HAPPENED TO CREDIT SUISSE AT1S?​

    AT1s rank higher than shares in the capital structure of a bank. If a bank runs into trouble, bondholders will rank above shareholders in terms of getting their money back.

    In Switzerland, the bonds' terms state, however, that in a restructuring, the financial watchdog is under no obligation to adhere to the traditional capital structure, which is how bondholders lost out in the Credit Suisse situation.
    -Reuters


    ETA I assume AT1's or CoCo's would really only be in the portfolio of an aggressive investor, not your average retirement portfolio?
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,087
    113
    North Central
    OUR banks are free from being legally forced to do something.
    Just not so. A big part of the sub-prime loan mess was government forcing banks to make risky loans to the governments preferred people. This was forced by the uniparty, dems could say they got their voters homes and republicans got their money backers profits with a government backstop if it failed.
     

    ditcherman

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Dec 18, 2018
    7,818
    113
    In the country, hopefully.
    Just not so. A big part of the sub-prime loan mess was government forcing banks to make risky loans to the governments preferred people. This was forced by the uniparty, dems could say they got their voters homes and republicans got their money backers profits with a government backstop if it failed.
    Did they force them too, or did they negotiate them to the position, with all their poor-judgment leadership in place?
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,087
    113
    North Central
    Did they force them too, or did they negotiate them to the position, with all their poor-judgment leadership in place?
    If by force you mean is there a specific law that says make bad loans, there is not that I know of. If by negotiate you mean regs with penalties combined with carrots on the other side, yes, I call that force. My banker friends call that force. And when the leftists told the dems they wanted it they too called it force…
     

    ditcherman

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Dec 18, 2018
    7,818
    113
    In the country, hopefully.
    If by force you mean is there a specific law that says make bad loans, there is not that I know of. If by negotiate you mean regs with penalties combined with carrots on the other side, yes, I call that force. My banker friends call that force. And when the leftists told the dems they wanted it they too called it force…
    So “no laws” vs “laws”, which is what L01 was pointing out upthread, the difference between us and them.
    It’s a fine line, no doubt, and I’m sure it feels like force.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,087
    113
    North Central
    So “no laws” vs “laws”, which is what L01 was pointing out upthread, the difference between us and them.
    It’s a fine line, no doubt, and I’m sure it feels like force.
    We are just debating semantics. As a farmer you should know just how much the government forces its edicts.
     

    Destro

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 10, 2011
    3,925
    113
    The Khyber Pass
    If by force you mean is there a specific law that says make bad loans, there is not that I know of. If by negotiate you mean regs with penalties combined with carrots on the other side, yes, I call that force. My banker friends call that force. And when the leftists told the dems they wanted it they too called it force…
    Just so I understand, you position is the 2008 subprime crisis was caused/driven by over-regulation?
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,087
    113
    North Central
    Just so I understand, you position is the 2008 subprime crisis was caused/driven by over-regulation?
    It was a big part, the other part is the big money banks knew they could make the profits from the sub-prime loans and the government would back stop the losses just as they did.

    Do you believe it was something else?
     

    jwamplerusa

    High drag, low speed...
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Feb 21, 2018
    4,358
    113
    Boone County
    Yup. Blanket deposit guarantee and unlimited bailout is coming. Rate cuts and QE. MMT crazies are firmly in control of the levers and all they know how to do is print.
    And this is the fast track path to hyperinflation. The thing that probably scares me more than anything else.

    Sadly, I don't believe that most of those currently in our government either elected or the professional bureaucrat class realize that there are essentially no Nations whose governments have survived a hyperinflationary event intact. All too often what comes after is some of the darkest corners of humanities treatment of other humans.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,517
    149
    Indiana

    Quick little primer for us mere mortals trying to follow along (maybe it's just me).

    WHAT IS AN AT1 BOND?​

    AT1 bonds - a $275 billion sector also known as "contingent convertibles" or "CoCo" bonds - act as shock absorbers if a bank's capital levels fall below a certain threshold. They can be converted into equity or written off.
    They make up part of the capital cushion that regulators require banks to hold to provide support in times of market turmoil.

    They are the riskiest type of bond a bank can issue and so carry a higher coupon.

    If AT1s are converted into equity, this supports a bank's balance sheet and helps it to stay afloat. They also pave the way for a "bail-in", or a way for banks to transfer risks to investors and away from taxpayers if they get into trouble.

    WHAT HAPPENED TO CREDIT SUISSE AT1S?​

    AT1s rank higher than shares in the capital structure of a bank. If a bank runs into trouble, bondholders will rank above shareholders in terms of getting their money back.

    In Switzerland, the bonds' terms state, however, that in a restructuring, the financial watchdog is under no obligation to adhere to the traditional capital structure, which is how bondholders lost out in the Credit Suisse situation.
    -Reuters


    ETA I assume AT1's or CoCo's would really only be in the portfolio of an aggressive investor, not your average retirement portfolio?
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    526,130
    Messages
    9,834,622
    Members
    53,992
    Latest member
    Renegade762
    Top Bottom