At the end of the day, to me, the law that is broken is the racketeering laws. The whole scheme of election fraud has been carefully built to create plausible deniability. I am over the whole queensberry rules for conservatives while the left runs amuck.Something smells a lot like semantics when you're arguing against it being against the law and then agreeing with another post about the abuse of power being against the law. I'm not talking about one specific part of the issue, but the issue as a whole. Twitter suppressing the story, along with Government collusion and abuse of power seems a little bit like it might be against the Constitution, if nothing else.
The well meaning like KLB and jamil are always pointing out this or that, when we suggest ways to clean up the mess, as being unconstitutional or unlawful. What would Washington do? Would he and his brethren sit on his hands while the republic fails? Or would they default to helpless because constitutional scholars told them they could not clean up the mess.
As it stands now we sit on our hands arguing over what the constitution allows to combat those flaunting the constitution at every turn.
Last edited: