Mandated vaccines or weekly testing for employers of 100+ people.......

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    51,082
    113
    Mitchell
    “This 50-page study, which was published on The Social Science Research Network at the end of August, analyzed CDC and industry-sponsored data on vaccine adverse events, and concluded that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause 18 to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.”

     

    wtburnette

    WT(aF)
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    45   0   0
    Nov 11, 2013
    27,060
    113
    SW side of Indy
    “This 50-page study, which was published on The Social Science Research Network at the end of August, analyzed CDC and industry-sponsored data on vaccine adverse events, and concluded that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause 18 to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.”


    Honestly mandating or even suggesting that anyone under the age of ~30 who doesn't have serious existing conditions is criminal in my mind.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,002
    113
    Avon
    If you can look at those charts and still believe the shot is effective you’re probably ****ing retarded.

    Their conclusions are definitely driven by funding and worried about cancellation. No one could come to the idea that “these work so well we need more”
    The vaccine was effective... for high-risk people, against the delta variant. I've seen no evidence of efficacy beyond that. And the evidence of harm documented in clinical trials, that only came out long after the fact, would have absolutely shut down clinicals for any other drug product... with an ethical IRB,at least.
     

    MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,443
    149
    Earth
    It's a good thing all those hospitals forced people on the organ transplant list to get the jab before being able to get a transplant. Oh wait.

     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    51,082
    113
    Mitchell
    It's a good thing all those hospitals forced people on the organ transplant list to get the jab before being able to get a transplant. Oh wait.

    It just keeps getting better and better.
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    104,722
    149
    Southside Indy
    It's a good thing all those hospitals forced people on the organ transplant list to get the jab before being able to get a transplant. Oh wait.

    As much as I agree that the vaccines are BS, that title is clickbait. It only talks about corneal transplants, not "organ transplants" as a whole. My ex just had a liver transplant and I was all fired up to ask her about her vax status, but this seems to be limited to cornea transplants.
     

    buckwacker

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 23, 2012
    3,085
    97
    The vaccine was effective... for high-risk people, against the delta variant. I've seen no evidence of efficacy beyond that. And the evidence of harm documented in clinical trials, that only came out long after the fact, would have absolutely shut down clinicals for any other drug product... with an ethical IRB,at least.
    I probably shouldn't say it, but I'm gonna: we told you so. I don't think you can really make the claim in the first sentence, yet.
     

    tim87tr

    Freedom lover
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Jul 3, 2010
    1,447
    113
    Eastern IL
    I probably shouldn't say it, but I'm gonna: we told you so. I don't think you can really make the claim in the first sentence, yet.
    Yes you should! Not much else to say at this point in a make believe world. In the real world is the fallout from the injections going to suddenly dissappear or not increase? Or will we find out that this was the greatest medical gift to mankind and not a humanitarian catastrophe?

    It'll be really difficult to continue to hide the increase in adverse effects and deaths. I hear about them quite often and there's plenty of stories on the board but not in one dedicated thread. I was around some friends Friday night and heard another pretty rough health problems story, absolutely related to the innoculation he didn't need to take.
     

    MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,443
    149
    Earth
    As much as I agree that the vaccines are BS, that title is clickbait. It only talks about corneal transplants, not "organ transplants" as a whole. My ex just had a liver transplant and I was all fired up to ask her about her vax status, but this seems to be limited to cornea transplants.
    My interpretation wad that the corneal transplants is just where the trend began to emerge, not that it's definitively limited to corneal transplants and no others. We'll have to wait and see.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,002
    113
    Avon
    I probably shouldn't say it, but I'm gonna: we told you so. I don't think you can really make the claim in the first sentence, yet.
    Told whom, what? It's the same position I've always held. Go back to 2020. I said back then that vaccines for this virus would have about the same chance of efficacy as the flu vaccine, because the virus is so mutable. Turns out, that's exactly what happened. The vaccine was developed against the delta variant, and didn't do squat against later variants. And, yes; from what I can tell: the vaccine was effective against the delta variant.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,002
    113
    Avon
    As effective as the flu vaccine is TBD and it's had way worse adverse effects than the flu vax ever has.
    I don't consider the flu vaccine to be effective at all for the vast majority of the population. It may have some efficacy for high-risk populations, if the right variant is guessed in the annual vaccine cocktail (sound familiar?).
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom