Leaked/breaking:Roe v. Wade expected to be overturned

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Timjoebillybob

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Feb 27, 2009
    9,419
    149
    But it's my contention that if it's an objective moral, it had to predate the discovery of it. So it does not matter when it's recognized, other than we can't hold people responsible for not having the moral maturity of the current age.

    And again, the problem I have with rights preceding morality, rights are dependent on right and wrong. I mean. if some morals are absolute. And rights derive from morals. Then the rights that derive from morals would also be absolute. But it sounds like you're making the case that regardless, if rights are absolute, then
    Yes, I'm making the argument that some rights are inherent. Regardless of the morals or if they are recognized. As you said "My conclusion is the same as yours, that human rights are inherent and unalienable". If it is inherent and unalienable, it is not dependent on morals. I'll agree that morals are required to recognize those rights. From Merriam's definition of inherent "involved in the constitution or essential character of something : belonging by nature or habit".
    Okay so does the squirrel have a right to life? That's a good question. I tend not to think in the same way humans do. Is there an underlying moral that would support such a right for squirrels? I think you might say morals are unnecessary for a squirrel to have rights. I don't think a right can stand without some absolute moral underpinning. So I'd say there would have to be some absolute moral truth that supports such a right. That feels subjective. I suppose I could make something up. But then I'd have to be a veeg. And I don't want to be a veeg. Not that I eat squirrel. That's a ****ing rodent. I don't eat rats either.
    Yes I would say that morals are unnecessary for a squirrel to have the right to life. Now some peoples morals would prevent them from infringing on that right, some peoples wouldn't. I'm in the latter group. Squirrel is far from a staple on my menu but I've had it a time or two, it was pretty tasty. Same with cat and dog. I've heard young groundhog is good as well. Heck Guinea pig is a delicacy for some.

    Or to put it this way, the squirrel has the right to attempt to feed itself, reproduce, and even defend itself in anyway it can. The eagle has those same rights, including by feeding itself and it's offspring said squirrel. No morals are required, it is the inherent right to life they have by nature.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,788
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I see it as a conflict if you agree with science that a two cell zygote is living and human but in the same breath you ask if they are "human enough?" My contention is if you agree with science that they are living and human then there is no such thing as "human enough"

    Either they are recognized as living and human from that point on or they are not. If they are then by default they are intitled to their right to continue to live once it is established that they are already living and human.
    What is it about a zygote’s stage of humanity that makes it of a moral importance above the Mother’s right to choose? I will agree that there is a stage when that becomes more apparent.

    But I have to go back to what I originally said, I think that moral importance derives from your world view.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    What is it about a zygote’s stage of humanity that makes it of a moral importance above the Mother’s right to choose? I will agree that there is a stage when that becomes more apparent.

    But I have to go back to what I originally said, I think that moral importance derives from your world view.
    My part of the discussion is based on sciences definition that a zygote is both living and human which you and I agree with. My moral importance is then based from that point on once it has been established by science as a living human being and therefore by definition a zygote is worthy of continuing to evolve as a living human being.

    It's been defined as already living and human. Why then should the mother have a moral right to terminate that development unless it poses a risk at that point concerning her own mortality? I just don't believe in your premise of "human enough"
     
    Last edited:

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,788
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Well, that’s the argument it looked to me like Chip was making. But it’s not science that makes you decide that it’s the right place to apply the right to that earliest stage. I understand the science too. And the science says, at least currently, the zygote doesn’t think, feel, etcetera, so at that point is there an objective reason to override the mother’s rights? You probably think there isn’t. And that an indicator that maybe it’s not so objective.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Well, that’s the argument it looked to me like Chip was making. But it’s not science that makes you decide that it’s the right place to apply the right to that earliest stage. I understand the science too. And the science says, at least currently, the zygote doesn’t think, feel, etcetera, so at that point is there an objective reason to override the mother’s rights? You probably think there isn’t. And that an indicator that maybe it’s not so objective.
    My point is once it has been established to already be a living human being does a mother have a right to terminate further development at that stage?

    Anway I'm not looking to re-hash a lengthy discussion between you and Chip. It's obvious that it's no closer to resolution than when it started no matter how many words are thrown at it. I said I was going to bow out of the discussion now look at me.
     
    Last edited:

    Hatin Since 87

    Bacon Hater
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 31, 2018
    11,635
    77
    Mooresville
    Okay. You asked for it.

    lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit dignissim pulvinar hac inceptos montes erat ultrices per nam lectus fames consequat tortor faucibus sociis and mi ultricies velit scelerisque laoreet at pellentesque pharetra ridiculus cras metus nibh imperdiet semper tempus et vestibulum orci varius id non tincidunt accumsan diam quam justo egestas ornare eleifend auctor mattis commodo platea vulputate porttitor neque libero euismod aliquam etiam malesuada rhoncus risus sed habitasse duis vel lacus feugiat lobortis penatibus aptent in a parturient ligula massa fusce dui porta phasellus ad posuere purus suscipit magna odio primis ullamcorper habitant vehicula ut iaculis aliquet mus arcu morbi interdum curabitur cursus placerat nulla blandit torquent ante vitae nascetur eget netus est sollicitudin sapien integer dapibus lacinia bibendum praesent dis molestie condimentum potenti dictum aenean pretium peparoni fringilla tellus sociosqu hendrerit eu tristique nostra nisl viverra nunc tempor augue nisi rutrum taciti mauris nec luctus urna turpis himenaeos elementum leo quis sagittis felis dictumst venenatis class quisque *** natoque nullam gravida litora sem convallis maecenas conubia sodales curae facilisi eros proin enim facilisis suspendisse tincidunt taciti placerat nostra nisi sit risus blandit sagittis consectetur dapibus facilisi dignissim diam lacinia cras pulvinar praesent tempor velit duis netus viverra dis nam feugiat porttitor nisl dictumst non in malesuada odio neque morbi vulputate suscipit lacus on sed faucibus urna torquent pretium suspendisse phasellus vehicula luctus vitae natoque quisque integer posuere turpis adipiscing montes aenean molestie mauris varius penatibus eu tortor consequat lorem etiam platea felis rhoncus pellentesque vestibulum libero eleifend interdum bibendum fringilla ultrices dolor sollicitudin imperdiet fusce augue curae habitant orci *** proin nibh maecenas leo sociosqu ligula hendrerit nullam enim litora massa lobortis nulla eget nec ullamcorper tristique elit auctor magna at semper amet id aliquam egestas dui laoreet tempus scelerisque purus accumsan per nunc sociis potenti ridiculus ad inceptos himenaeos sapien aptent elementum cursus condimentum iaculis dictum a primis ut eros tellus hac euismod nascetur ante vel est donec fames sem senectus ornare porta aliquet class mattis arcu convallis ipsum mus venenatis parturient pharetra mi curabitur conubia rutrum ultricies quis metus facilisis habitasse sodales gravida commodo quam lectus justo et eleifend taciti nostra amet elementum maecenas mi faucibus orci imperdiet sodales vulputate varius sollicitudin aliquam ultrices habitant netus himenaeos morbi facilisis ligula quis in posuere interdum quam id phasellus vehicula placerat viverra eros duis rutrum consectetur nec tortor gravida est augue sed purus condimentum vitae lacus ut vel lobortis ridiculus donec luctus proin torquent montes dolor tempor porttitor felis dignissim lacinia ad cursus fringilla malesuada accumsan sit habitasse at ullamcorper diam quisque feugiat commodo aptent litora nam hac sociosqu non lectus tellus iaculis praesent etiam dictumst mattis sagittis curae fames per sapien semper tincidunt leo libero euismod consequat metus ipsum eu bibendum elit integer nibh lorem nascetur turpis potenti parturient ultricies mauris pulvinar risus curabitur aenean class pharetra tempus et pretium urna nisi nunc auctor venenatis fusce rhoncus nisl hendrerit justo velit sociis *** senectus blandit dui conubia dictum scelerisque egestas magna adipiscing eget primis vestibulum facilisi tristique massa dapibus convallis molestie nulla aliquet a arcu erat nullam dis porta odio platea neque penatibus laoreet suscipit natoque sem mus ante pellentesque ornare suspendisse cras enim inceptos nisl elit tempor ultricies metus dui torquent hac sem habitasse dictumst purus convallis dolor aliquet vehicula sociis orci justo tristique nibh senectus adipiscing aptent ullamcorper facilisi hendrerit luctus sodales molestie mi rhoncus libero curabitur placerat dis porta massa tellus aliquam felis praesent tincidunt *** morbi est dictum penatibus donec lectus potenti quisque quam vel nulla sollicitudin mus cursus feugiat non interdum ornare ultrices faucibus netus eget himenaeos rutrum etiam sagittis vulputate proin lacinia varius pellentesque viverra sociosqu ligula nostra consectetur curae ridiculus enim dignissim blandit ante facilisis sit mattis urna litora primis platea arcu ipsum phasellus gravida taciti dapibus pretium maecenas magna duis bibendum in imperdiet odio aenean lorem leo commodo suspendisse semper a lobortis condimentum class risus cras fames malesuada venenatis erat porttitor elementum pizza diam integer tortor per suscipit consequat euismod nascetur scelerisque posuere inceptos velit montes laoreet parturient iaculis auctor fringilla ut nam augue nunc sed tempus at mauris eu nisi neque amet quis pulvinar vitae vestibulum pharetra ad eleifend et natoque lacus egestas conubia id sapien fusce nullam accumsan nec eros habitant luctus mi taciti natoque nostra at ut aliquet potenti tempus netus egestas litora integer quisque sagittis ornare semper himenaeos bibendum est ante adipiscing torquent per faucibus aliquam auctor dictum accumsan rutrum rhoncus ultrices porta nibh vehicula blandit tortor condimentum augue convallis tellus nam platea eleifend praesent cursus sodales molestie posuere fringilla nisi ad dolor senectus hendrerit sit enim nascetur aptent gravida sociis vel montes arcu conubia etiam feugiat odio commodo hac ultricies maecenas nec nisl sem sed phasellus penatibus scelerisque tristique nullam sollicitudin mus consectetur proin eget iaculis dignissim elementum diam erat elit lectus euismod leo nunc varius suscipit lobortis justo *** consequat eu curabitur et tempor class facilisi purus duis non dis lacinia parturient massa a pretium libero malesuada dapibus lorem dui porttitor id urna eros sociosqu suspendisse ipsum quis mauris habitasse vulputate donec pharetra felis fames orci placerat ridiculus nulla viverra dictumst aenean ligula metus laoreet amet risus primis fusce velit quam pellentesque mattis neque imperdiet vestibulum lacus turpis curae morbi facilisis sapien interdum tincidunt inceptos ullamcorper pulvinar cras vitae venenatis in habitant magna habitasse luctus ultricies fames scelerisque vel himenaeos quisque aptent facilisis nisl sociis consequat lectus risus vitae iaculis phasellus aenean suspendisse natoque a aliquam lacus elementum proin purus dolor lacinia nec convallis viverra eleifend sed nam pulvinar penatibus posuere hendrerit urna cras class vulputate dictumst turpis porta magna habitant hac nibh senectus interdum tristique consectetur mauris arcu sit eros rhoncus fringilla ridiculus potenti curabitur is vestibulum porttitor vehicula nascetur tortor libero massa pharetra gravida feugiat facilisi malesuada adipiscing parturient pellentesque varius sem orci tellus ante sodales etiam morbi lobortis laoreet semper rutrum placerat diam ligula suscipit nullam quis lorem amet nulla maecenas in felis litora leo sapien dictum at nisi inceptos augue blandit nunc accumsan ad tempor ut ornare ultrices gross.
    I agree.
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,303
    77
    Porter County
    It's obvious that it's no closer to resolution than when it started no matter how many words are thrown at it. I said I was going to bow out of the discussion now look at me.
    There will never be a resolution. I think that is the point to be taken away here.

    People are going to have to decide if their feelings about this subject are strong enough to override their feelings about others, or if there is some kind of compromise position they are willing to accept. Is this a hill for Republicans to die on? I doubt you will get a majority to agree abortion should be illegal period.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    There will never be a resolution. I think that is the point to be taken away here.

    People are going to have to decide if their feelings about this subject are strong enough to override their feelings about others, or if there is some kind of compromise position they are willing to accept. Is this a hill for Republicans to die on? I doubt you will get a majority to agree abortion should be illegal period.
    Edit: Never mind my response that I previously typed here. Let's just say I will always be all in on a right to life otherwise I am not staying true to my views.

    I'm out.
     
    Last edited:

    bwframe

    Loneranger
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    94   0   0
    Feb 11, 2008
    38,183
    113
    Btown Rural
    Heard on the radio last night that SCOTUS is set to release a decision today.
    May or may not be on the Roe vs Wade case.
    Also speculation that the decision from the New York rifle and pistol club could be released today as well, but nothing definitive.
    1652752023382.png
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    32,130
    77
    Camby area
    If the central state adhered to the constitution and the states exercised their authority in enforcing it, this would be a much different place.
    And if the elite were subject to the same rules peons like us are, there would be MANY more powerful folks in jail.

    You know, Like a kid takes a selfie with a top secret control panel in the background and he is thrown in the brig and court martialed. Hillary violates NUMEROUS violations of mishandling classified info, including it ending up in the personal inboxes of Huma and Weiner boy, and the latter three are never prosecuted. Mind boggling.


    And dont get me started on the Lolita Express and how none of the Johns are being prosecuted.

    There. Are. Two. Judicial. Systems.:xmad:
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,490
    149
    1,000 yards out
    And if the elite were subject to the same rules peons like us are, there would be MANY more powerful folks in jail.

    You know, Like a kid takes a selfie with a top secret control panel in the background and he is thrown in the brig and court martialed. Hillary violates NUMEROUS violations of mishandling classified info, including it ending up in the personal inboxes of Huma and Weiner boy, and the latter three are never prosecuted. Mind boggling.


    And dont get me started on the Lolita Express and how none of the Johns are being prosecuted.

    There. Are. Two. Judicial. Systems.:xmad:

    Tip of the tip of the tip of the berg.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    32,130
    77
    Camby area
    Tip of the tip of the tip of the berg.
    Disclaimer: Im not calling for insurrection. Thats against the board rules.

    But things arent going to balance out without a French style revolution. Just saying that without one, there will be no level playing field until those in power are brought to justice. (and frankly I doubt it will ever get levelled.)
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,490
    149
    1,000 yards out
    Disclaimer: Im not calling for insurrection. Thats against the board rules.

    But things arent going to balance out without a French style revolution. Just saying that without one, there will be no level playing field until those in power are brought to justice. (and frankly I doubt it will ever get levelled.)

    "French style revolutions" do not turn out so well.
    Not a proponent.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    32,130
    77
    Camby area
    "French style revolutions" do not turn out so well.
    Not a proponent.
    Oh, I never said the outcome would be better. Just that its the only way it would stop the current shenanigans. You are correct, that it would likely be as bad in a different way. But there is a chance. (not one I really truly want to take)
     
    Top Bottom