Leaked/breaking:Roe v. Wade expected to be overturned

[Cameramonkey]

This could get interesting.

And I totally agree. Its a states-rights issue. Not a federal issue.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Votes to Overturn Roe v. Wade, Politico Reports - Todd Starnes

The Todd Starnes Show is America’s fastest-growing conservative podcast. Click here to subscribe to the show! The Supreme Court has voted to overturn […]

www.toddstarnes.com

So I wonder how legit this really is? Or if maybe the is leak is either "Russian Collusion", a leak of the wrong side (e.g. both sides write their opinion and only the one that actually supports the vote gets published... kinda like the obits that accidentally get published before a death), or fake news floated to find a mole?

I agree with this opinion wholeheartedly strictly on the basis of the opinion: Overreach. Anything not enumerated in the Constitution defers to the states. The states should be the ones to outlaw it if they wish.

 

[KellyinAvon]

This could get interesting.

And I totally agree. Its a states-rights issue. Not a federal issue.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Votes to Overturn Roe v. Wade, Politico Reports - Todd Starnes

The Todd Starnes Show is America’s fastest-growing conservative podcast. Click here to subscribe to the show! The Supreme Court has voted to overturn […]

www.toddstarnes.com

So I wonder how legit this really is? Or if maybe the is leak is either "Russian Collusion", a leak of the wrong side (e.g. both sides write their opinion and only the one that actually supports the vote gets published... kinda like the obits that accidentally get published before a death), or fake news floated to find a mole?

I agree with this opinion wholeheartedly strictly on the basis of the opinion: Overreach. Anything not enumerated in the Constitution defers to the states. The states should be the ones to outlaw it if they wish.

Watching this now on Hannity. NEVER have seen a leak out of SCOTUS.

Edit: Alan Dershowitz thinks it was leaked by a lib clerk to try to influence votes. They would be disbarred for this.

 

[BigRed]

Is the ministry of truth aware of this?

 

[Cameramonkey]

Watching this now on Hannity. NEVER have seen a leak out of SCOTUS.

I suspect:
1: A leftist liberal female clerk that is slit-her-wrists upset over this literally antichrist level decision.
2: An overexcited/overzealous conservative clerk overjoyed.

My money is on #1.

 

[DadSmith]

I'll believe it when I see it actually happen.

 

[KellyinAvon]

I suspect:
1: A leftist liberal female clerk that is slit-her-wrists upset over this literally antichrist level decision.
2: An overexcited/overzealous conservative clerk overjoyed.

My money is on #1.

Alan Dershowitz agrees with #1

 

[KellyinAvon]

I'll believe it when I see it actually happen.

Me also.

 

[Mgderf]

Watching this now on Hannity. NEVER have seen a leak out of SCOTUS.

Edit: Alan Dershowitz thinks it was leaked by a lib clerk to try to influence votes. They would be disbarred for this.

They SHOULD be imprisoned.

 

[Cameramonkey]

I'll believe it when I see it actually happen.

Same. See my comment about premature obits.

 

[Cameramonkey]

And given the opposition to this ruling if true, I wonder if the likes of Antifa will put a bounty out on Alito's head for wrongthink?

OR as a friend mentioned, could this be to help fuel the midterms? Get the vote out for all those Dems in trouble for those that otherwise dont care. "Save the dems! They are our only hope for reproductive rights!"

 

[Ark]

Sounds sensational. We'll see.

From the most objective, strict constructionist perspective, all rights not explicitly stated in the constitution are enumerated to the states. Abortion is not in the constitution. Medical privacy is not in the constitution (an oversight in my opinion). Thus, feds are hands off and states decide for themselves.

I was a big believer in Roe for the longest time, from a bodily autonomy and medical privacy perspective. I believe those things deserve to be protected. Then, the last two years happened, and the left proved they don't give a rats butthole about those principles except in the context of justifying abortion. This SCOTUS protected my right to work when Biden tried to shove his nose into my private employment and private medical choices. So... who's on my side?

Wonder what the "floor" will be. Total bans at the state level acceptable? Maximum weeks cutoff?

 

[Trevelayan]

Remember those Midterms that Republicans were sure they were going to wipe?

 

[ChristianPatriot]

Buckle up for more mostly peaceful protests

 

[HoughMade]

I am suspicious as I am unaware of this kind of leak happening in the past...but we do live in "unprecedented times."

Also, assuming its authentic, whether it represents the actual, final majority opinion, a dissent or partial concurrence or whatever is not known with certainty. There are times draft opinions are written and then they are circulated to see who will sign on. It may be the majority, but if not enough people sign on, it could be something else. I have heard of votes changing based upon the draft. Assuming this is real, all I think we know is that it is someone's opinion, at least Justice Alito's.

I'm in "wait and see" mode.

 

[ljk]

It's never so called "Leaks", it's called "sabotage".

Ask Trump about leaks.

And John Roberts?

 

[BigRed]

Alito will have to guard against pillows now.

 

[churchmouse]

Here we go.....

 

[BigRed]

Screaming Liberal MELTDOWN over RBG

Screaming Liberal MELTDOWN over RBG Girl driving in her car hears that Ruth Bader Ginsburg has passed away and screams and swears her head off going absolute...

m.youtube.com

Keep an eye out for this one.

 

[jsx1043]

The wailing and gnashing of teeth has begun:

Leaked Draft Supreme Court Opinion Overturns Roe v. Wade, Politico Reports

The leak is the thing. It's egregious, and clearly meant to give liberal groups almost two months before the term ends at the end of June to pressure the Court much like there was a pressure campaign against Chief Justice Roberts on Obamacare.

legalinsurrection.com

 

[JTScribe]

This has been rumored for a while on the law blogs I follow based on the questioning in the hearing.