Rittenhouse pleads 'Not Guilty'

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,247
    149
    1,000 yards out
    "We respect the jury verdict based on three and a half days of careful deliberations," Graveley said in the statement. "Certainly, issues regarding the privilege of self-defense remain highly contentious in our current times.


    Privilege? That tells what these mother ******* **** suckers think of you and your natural rights.

    Graveley can go to ****
     

    Twangbanger

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Oct 9, 2010
    7,096
    113
    "We respect the jury verdict based on three and a half days of careful deliberations," Graveley said in the statement. "Certainly, issues regarding the privilege of self-defense remain highly contentious in our current times.


    Privilege? That tells what these mother ******* **** suckers think of you and your natural rights.

    Graveley can go to ****
    Yep. Only way to fix this attitude is for the Supreme Court to shove it up their azz.

    Hopefully, the Rittenhouse Verdict gives the Supremes an idea of where Americans' minds are right now, on the subject of violent protests and self-defense, and they act in accordance with what the public is telling them.

    You are going to see the pressure ramped up on "threatening" Conservative justices like never before, I would wager. Liberals just got a shock, and they now realize what a game-set-match this SC decision will be.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,927
    77
    Camby area
    Listening to Huber's aunt on the Today show was annoying. You're right. He didnt need to die. He could have turned his life around at any point and stopped being a thug.



    Speaking of "He shouldnt have been there...":rolleyes:
     
    Last edited:

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,247
    149
    1,000 yards out
    Listening to Huber's aunt on the Today show was annoying. You're right. He didnt need to die. He could have turned his life around at any point and stopped being a thug.



    Speaking of "He shouldnt have been there...":rolleyes:


    I do not cry over spilled milk or garbage that has been disposed of.
     

    Doug

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    69   0   0
    Sep 5, 2008
    6,544
    149
    Indianapolis
    The looting will stop when store owners put armed security in their stores with full video coverage of all entry points. A programmed audio of "Stop, leave the building," is started when the entry is breached. The armed guards then shoot everyone who indicates, by entering the building, their intent to kill the guards and/or burn the store .
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Who was there under the most honorable pretenses? Rittenhouse wasn't there to create havoc and destruction. Can you make the case for his assailants?

    They sealed their own fate. They chose to initiate the attack on Rittenhouse because he got in their path of criminal mayhem after which he reasonably acted in self defense against each and every one of those attempts to commit great bodily harm and or death.

    Rittenhouse never went there intending to shoot anyone. He chose not to become a victim to the mob and was forced into legally defending himself and the jury acquitted him rightly so based on the evidence.
     

    dusty88

    Master
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Aug 11, 2014
    3,179
    83
    United States
    "We respect the jury verdict based on three and a half days of careful deliberations," Graveley said in the statement. "Certainly, issues regarding the privilege of self-defense remain highly contentious in our current times.


    Privilege? That tells what these mother ******* **** suckers think of you and your natural rights.

    Graveley can go to ****
    Maybe one of the lawyers can comment. My impression is that the term privilege here is a legal term. I think it means that you have the privilege to do things that would otherwise be a violation of the law ie punch someone or shoot someone because you are "privileged" to do so under circumstances.
     

    Twangbanger

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Oct 9, 2010
    7,096
    113
    There's Sheepdogs and then there's Pomeranians.
    For the record: one Pomeranian scrubbed graffiti off walls, cleared debris, and survived an entangled gunfight on the ground, clearing society's rolls of one convicted sex offender and another multiple convicted violent felon.

    The Sheepdogs covered it from the sidelines.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,927
    77
    Camby area
    For the record: one Pomeranian scrubbed graffiti off walls, cleared debris, and survived an entangled gunfight on the ground, clearing society's rolls of one convicted sex offender and another multiple convicted violent felon.

    The Sheepdogs covered it from the sidelines.
    Further reinforcing its not always the big dogs you have to worry about. I'll take my chances touching barking mastiff over a barking yorkie or chihuahua .
     

    ditcherman

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Dec 18, 2018
    7,714
    113
    In the country, hopefully.
    I think this last part is key. We've gotten to the point where politicians, city managers, activist media and the like have either convinced or conditioned people to step back and allow violent actors to take control of communities and wreak havoc on them.

    While I can sort of see the logic behind the notion that it was a bad idea for KR to be there, that plays right into the narrative that we all should just lay back and take it while communities are being violated. And ultimately that narrative is nonsense.

    We NEED to flip the script and get back to the reality where it's a bad idea for violent actors to be out in the streets causing destruction. This ultimately is what all of this is about. The activists and TPTB want to have a monopoly on use of force and power. We cannot allow that to happen.
    Really well stated.
    When I first started carrying, I read a lot of publications like Concealed Carry from USCCA. Tons of great information.
    But they are an insurance company. An insurance company that wants you to do something a little dangerous, but not too dangerous. Hence, the “remove yourself at all costs if at all possible” advice. They don’t want to pay out, of course, and in the name of “safety” there are certain situations that you should “lose”. Same with any civilian trainer.

    I’m sure this logic was prevalent before they said it as well, and in many cases it totally makes sense. Like everything, you have to draw the line somewhere. My point is this logic is not what makes heroes, frees people, and makes new countries.

    There was a meme posted recently that said “you can’t talk to your supervisor that way”, and the warrior putting on his armor replied “that’s why no one will remember your name”.

    There’s a cost to inserting yourself into danger, but there’s also a cost to not inserting yourself into danger.
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    For the record: one Pomeranian scrubbed graffiti off walls, cleared debris, and survived an entangled gunfight on the ground, clearing society's rolls of one convicted sex offender and another multiple convicted violent felon.

    The Sheepdogs covered it from the sidelines.
    I don't remember the context in which I wrote that, and I'm not going back to figure it out.

    But, it ain't what you think I meant.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Saw in an interview where Rittenhouse's lead defense attorney Richards said that he's not a Fox news type and primarily watches MSM types like MSNBC and CNN and he just wished that they would get at least the simple facts straight and he gave the Joe Scarborough outrageous lie as an example.

    He might wanna rethink his choices in "media" coverage because Fox turned out to be the only ones to give his client the most fair and truthful coverage based on the evidence.
     
    Top Bottom