Vaccine coercion/bribery

[rooster]

I’ll believe the stats when they release total death stats from 2020. They are still playing with the numbers so it might be a while.

 

[BugI02]

Calling people liars for what is ACTUALLY happening to them is still not acceptable. That’s what has been happening and I will call that ************ out on it every ****ing time he opens his mouth with this ****. I’m tired of it. I don’t appreciate being called a liar because you don’t want to believe reality.

It's called gaslighting, and he seems to have no shortage of gas

All in favor of calling him Marcellus instead of Kirk

 

[Leo]

I find this interesting, and it is comforting and unsettling at the same time

U.S. Death Rate 1950-2024

Chart and table of the U.S. death rate from 1950 to 2024. United Nations projections are also included through the year 2100.

www.macrotrends.net

If we notice the USA death rates all the way back to 1950 we see it at 9.5 per 1000 population. Go forward to 2018 and it improves to 8.685 per 1000. 2020 with covid, the rate is 8.88 per 1000 and 2021 is on track for 8.977 per 1000 population.

The way the news reports makes you think that 50% of everyone is dying in the street. Even with the .09 out of 1000 raise in 2021, we are still .5 out of a 1000 better than the peace and prosperity year of 1950.

Just think of how healthy we would be if chemists' would stop adulterating the nutrition out of our food and big pharma would not be designing medicines to maintain the need for the product for the rest of your life. And madmen were not trying to genetically re engineer the strands of human life.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

Good news, indicators point to major progress where masks are increasingly not needed: increasing vaccination levels, new treatments, decreasing infection rates.

Except, none of that is the reason why that is happening. That’s just what they’re going to claim. Vaccines don’t decrease infection rates. They’ve admitted that, and said it’s intended to prevent hospitalization. Mask don’t prevent infection. A cloth mask isn’t going to stop a microscopic virus from coming into or going out of a person. The new treatments you speak of is called ivermectin, and you was insulting people for advocating for it earlier.

 

[ditcherman]

Sorry I offended you with a sense of humor. I shall cease all humor at once as I know the Internet . . . is serious bidness.

I bring more good news:

India's COVID-19 daily deaths, cases lowest in months; world toll down 10% - UPI.com

India's current coronavirus situation is small fraction of record peaks several months ago: 4.4% of the deaths in June and 5.6% of the cases in May. Weekly global toll decreased 10% and infections 9%.

www.upi.com

Yea! And you know how they did it! hOrSe DeWoRmEr!!! Er I mean, ivermectin. The thing that’s won a Nobel prize, the thing that is prescribed at least tens of thousands times for human use each year.

Ivermectin, ‘Wonder drug’ from Japan: the human use perspective

Discovered in the late-1970s, the pioneering drug ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin—originating solely from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Intitute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil—has had an immeasurably ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Here’s the link to the ivermectin use in India, kept secret for a while.

India's Ivermectin Blackout - Part V: The Secret Revealed

On May 7, 2021, during the peak of India's Delta Surge, The World Health Organization reported, "Uttar Pradesh (is) going the last mile to stop COVID-19."

www.thedesertreview.com

 

[JettaKnight]

If your doctor believes it's the correct solution for you, who are you to tell someone with a medical degree that they're wrong?

What if that someone with a medical degree tells you to get vaccinated?

 

[Tombs]

What if that someone with a medical degree tells you to get vaccinated?

Then ask them the simple question, "could you provide me a study on the potential side effects for my age range after 2-5 years?"

They're more than willing to do that with any other medication they prescribe. If this isn't possible, or gets them angry, then it's time to find a new doctor.

 

[JettaKnight]

Then ask them the simple question, "could you provide me a study on the potential side effects for my age range after 2-5 years?"

They're more than willing to do that with any other medication they prescribe. If this isn't possible, or gets them angry, then it's time to find a new doctor.

You know, you don't actually need 2-5 years of data you give you the potential sides effects in 2-5 years, right?

 

[Tombs]

You know, you don't actually need 2-5 years of data you give you the potential sides effects in 2-5 years, right?

Yes Alex, I'd like to take "what is a phase III trial" for 200.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

You know, you don't actually need 2-5 years of data you give you the potential sides effects in 2-5 years, right?

No, you need a Magic 8 Ball.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

You know, you don't actually need 2-5 years of data you give you the potential sides effects in 2-5 years, right?

 

[JettaKnight]

No, you need a Magic 8 Ball.

Or science. This sort of thing happens at the time in all sorts of fields.


Also, when you ask, "what's in taking this?", do you also ask, "what's risk in not taking it"?

 

[Hatin Since 87]

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Or science. This sort of thing happens at the time in all sorts of fields.

Do tell. And don't tell me about "extrapolation". Doesn't apply.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

"We injected this into a mouse, and 8 hours later, it was still alive, therefore we can conclude that it will still be safe in humans 5 years from now with the conversion of mouse years to human years."

 

[JCSR]

 

[Leo]

The difference between a compound being sold as a horse dewormer or an anti viral is the paperwork generated by the corporate marketing and the corporate lawyers. The Pharma corp types determine where they think they can make money. If you think they have your specific interest in mind, then ask Santa Claus to bring you a pony for Christmas. We have to remember, that the FDA does not guarantee the effectiveness of any product.

From the FDA website :
FDA does not develop or test products before approving them. Instead, FDA experts review the results of laboratory, animal, and human clinical testing done by manufacturers. If FDA grants an approval, it means the agency has determined that the benefits of the product outweigh the known risks for the intended use.
*note; "testing done by the manufacturers" even the EPA actually tests the mpg of vehicles.

If nothing else, this whole mess has served to educate us about the realities of life and they turn out to be nothing like Sister Joseph Anne taught us in the 7th grade health class.

 

[Alpo]

If your doctor believes it's the correct solution for you, who are you to tell someone with a medical degree that they're wrong?

You know, there is someone out there that came in at the bottom of his class.

The reference to a Nobel prize for the treatment of parasitic infections in humans is an appeal to authority and a fallacious argument. Please provide a peer reviewed trial of Ivermectin for the treatment of Covid-19 infections.

 

[jsx1043]

I asked this question a ways back but it flew under the radar:

Who here has gotten the vaccination FROM their doctor?

And if you haven’t gotten vaccinated, is the vaccine available at your doctor’s office?

 

[HoughMade]

You know, there is someone out there that came in at the bottom of his class.

And believe it or not...some have agendas, political or otherwise.

But don't worry, only the left has doctors with agendas. I'm positive.

Blind faith in doctors for me, but not for thee!

Which, given my area of practice, I find kind of amusing. If it were not for the rules of professional responsibility, I would have stories.

There is information available that is largely agenda free...unless, of course, one assumes anyone who disagrees with their present belief has an agenda....