The Insane "Social Justice" Thread pt IV

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,261
    149
    Columbus, OH
    That’s not a rebutal.
    Perhaps you should include the temporal component - you know, so your thinking isn't so binary/two dimensional

    Perhaps a post, answering a previous post, should be viewed in the light of the quoted post it is answering and not expected to answer any temporally subsequent post of yours simply because of where each occurs on the timeline

    I am showing you that your invocation of Locke, as contained in those 'enlightenment ideals' you are so enamored of, comes with some additional baggage (from what would seem to be your viewpoint) with the added caveat that most of the founding fathers would have had little to no problem with his view of the Bible

    I find it ridiculous that people who insisted Trump wasn't squeaky clean enough to represent THEIR Republican Party will cleave to a mentally insane, self-mutilating freak who happens to embody the perverse flavor of the moment. It smacks of opportunism and desperation


    That is not a woman and never will be, and to enable and encourage that delusion is in and of itself a crime against humanity. It is the rough equivalent, to me, of supporting a candidate who thinks he is Captain Kangaroo under the guise that the delusion is harmless as long as he mouths the proper platitudes. For someone who can't even accept the election was corrupt without absolute proof, one wonders when you will cite proof, beyond your personal predilections, that supporting and lionizing this thing will in any way help or broaden republican support in California - which after all should be the goal. Losing sight of that just makes it another 'First [insert current cause célèbre here] candidate ever'

    How did that Bootyjudge thing work out
     
    Last edited:

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,261
    149
    Columbus, OH
    This is the insane social Justice thread. Prolly should just get back to that.
    Cool. Supporting an obviously mentally defective person, operating under the delusion they are a woman despite possessing XY genetics, is driven by misplaced social justice concerns and de facto insane - so, fits the category
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,261
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Watching a bit of the Weather Channel. Being 'treated' to a PSA* (propaganda service announcement) about how the poor/PoC suffer from a lack of 'tree equity'. The evil rich white people (ERWP?) have more trees in their neighborhoods - I assume because of racism

    Kicker is apparently we need to fund mass tree planting, at the cost of billions, to rectify the 'problem'. No timeline given for how long that might take :rolleyes:

    I think I've seen this episode before


     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom