At least the old site didn’t star out “mother” so that I didn’t have to count stars to knownwhich naughty word you used.The sick ************ was posing for pictures in front of smoldering dead citizens.
At least the old site didn’t star out “mother” so that I didn’t have to count stars to knownwhich naughty word you used.The sick ************ was posing for pictures in front of smoldering dead citizens.
It’s good. But I have to say I’m a little disappointed that INGO didn’t have to star out any words.Mind if I use that? Says it better than I can.
It's a shame the English language lacks words harsh enough to truly describe that miscreant.At least the old site didn’t star out “mother” so that I didn’t have to count stars to knownwhich naughty word you used.
It's a shame the English language lacks words harsh enough to truly describe that miscreant.
It does. It’s just that society has socially banned them in polite conversation. ************ is an English word.
Pol Pot is covered under the “planning and implementation” portion you failed to acknowledge.Neither did Pol Pot
Edit: Perhaps meditate on the difference between proximate cause and root cause
I’m missing the distinction you’re attempting to draw.Hmmm. It seems to be enough for the gov't to go after people from 6 January
You should've seen my rough draft.It’s good. But I have to say I’m a little disappointed that INGO didn’t have to star out any words.
Being there equals prosecutable culpability, unless apparently you are a fed burning citizens en masse.I’m missing the distinction you’re attempting to draw.
Again you are stating things you can’t possibly know. The Trump insurrectionists are being charged for specific, individual, actions. A distasteful photograph isn’t a prosecutable crime.Being there equals prosecutable culpability, unless apparently you are a fed burning citizens en masse.
You must be a believer in the Nuremberg "just following orders" defense for mass murder.Again you are stating things you can’t possibly know. The Trump insurrectionists are being charged for specific, individual, actions. A distasteful photograph isn’t a prosecutable crmasses.
He doesn’t care. It’s his guys pick, he’s not gonna down him.He's a mass murderer of women and children.
There's nothing about him that warrants him still being breathing on the surface of this planet.
So let me get your logic straight, any person related to LE who happened to present during the Waco Siege, regardless of the capacity, and is just as guilty as Nazis present at concentration camps. Is this really the logic you want to go with?You must be a believer in the Nuremberg "just following orders" defense for mass murder.
1. The shoe fits. They torched US citizens, the overwhelming majority of which did zero wrong.So let me get your logic straight, any person related to LE who happened to present during the Waco Siege, regardless of the capacity, and is just as guilty as Nazis present at concentration camps. Is this really the logic you want to go with?
I think Moms Needing Some Action would have no problem with seeing their perceived enemies deadI wonder how Moms Needing Some Action would react to these pictures of the person they've chosen as their champion. Or Bloomberg. Someone should use those to hold their feet to the fire over this.
Fixycongrats folks. You“won”[got away with massive fraud]
Now you've got me thinking about joining that group.I wonder how Moms Needing Some Action would react to these pictures of the person they've chosen as their champion. Or Bloomberg. Someone should use those to hold their feet to the fire over this.
That you are using 'he merely showed up' as justification for Chipman relative to Waco. You are fine, however, with the full weight of federalI’m missing the distinction you’re attempting to draw.
Tell that to the first responder who photographed the Kobe Bryant augur in siteAgain you are stating things you can’t possibly know. The Trump insurrectionists are being charged for specific, individual, actions. A distasteful photograph isn’t a prosecutable crime.