Just as long as he's a constitutional, you know....
Soooo, it's okay if he beats his wife with a rolled up copy of the Constitution???? (Purple Implied)
Out of curiosity, why would that will be a winner for them?So far only two Dems have brought up the one issue that could be a winner for them, the Chevron Doctrine.
Out of curiosity, why would that will be a winner for them?
And, while it has a dramatic influence on our lives, I don't think most people will really care. T'will be difficult, methinks, to turn this into a rallying cry.
The roots and limits of Gorsuch?s views on Chevron deference - SCOTUSblog
Interesting take.It is one of the more important rules. Without Chevron courts can make up their own rules (AT&T v. Portland, Brand X v. FCC, and NCTA v. Brand X and FCC) or each decision by an agency (FCC, EPA, etc) would become a litigation nightmare with Congress having to pass detailed legislation. The few senators who brought it up, brought up the EPA in particular (which would be a good rally for the left).
Interesting take.
My $.02.
First, without Chevron, our government would look a lot more like it was designed in the Constitution. To make laws/rules, Congress has to act. The judicially-approved 4th branch - the Administrative Branch - is a bastard hybrid of executive and legislative. The Chevron defense basically protects that bastardization.
Second, it'll be REALLY hard to turn that into a hook to turn people against Gorsuch.
Dems like Feinstein: Very Troubling.The great lie...along with the concept of "super-precedent" I saw in another article, earlier.
Feinstein: Constitution A 'Living Document;' 'Originalism... Very Troubling' | Daily Wire
Dems like Feinstein: Very Troubling.
That's why they favor justices (of their liking) to do their bidding. It's a much easier way of getting around an "outdated piece of paper"Once again, they don't see their own hypocrisy. The stuff the founders wrote down and all the states (and their citizens) had a chance to ratify = flexible. Stuff as few as 5 justices vote on = carved in stone and unchangable.
That's why they favor justices (of their liking) to do their bidding. It's a much easier way of getting around an "outdated piece of paper"
Interesting take.
My $.02.
First, without Chevron, our government would look a lot more like it was designed in the Constitution. To make laws/rules, Congress has to act. The judicially-approved 4th branch - the Administrative Branch - is a bastard hybrid of executive and legislative. The Chevron defense basically protects that bastardization.
Second, it'll be REALLY hard to turn that into a hook to turn people against Gorsuch.
She already knows that is when a liberal court says that what she wants is right.Someone should explain Constitutional amendments to Ms. Feinstein.