EPA Releases Tons Of Pollution Into Colorado River

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • prescut

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    206
    18
    United States
    I can't believe how simple this is.

    You believe that governments solve problems, or
    You believe that governments cause problems.

    Once you fall off the fence, issues become clear.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,788
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Alpo, I think the issue people are complaining most about is that, it's "**** happens" when the EPA does it, and it's huge fines and lost licenses when a business does it. The EPA is supposed to protect our environment from the poopy Capitalists. Who the hell will protect us from the EPA?

    That makes it NOT "**** happens". If capitalists ****ing up our environment is important enough that we create a whole regulation scheme to prevent it, then there should be consequences when the preventers **** it up. I don't know what the consequences should be. Can't fine them. It's not MY fault they ****ed up. I shouldn't have to pay for it. Probably at least some high level people should lose their cushy jobs.
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    I looked over the Freedom Elk River spill information that I could find. It didn't appear that the EPA was in the center of this disaster. There were state and federal authorities involved, but the EPA? They found no issues in the prior 5 years at the Elk River storage facility.

    I hate to say it, but this stuff is like the Black Life Matters hue and cry. Yes 30 or so unarmed black men have been killed, some of which were inexcusable homicides on any reasonable basis. But there are a million cops out there and some very high number of DAILY arrests occur without incident. Cops are getting bad guys out of the population. So, I'm not going to attack the "government", this time represented by law enforcement, because there are problems. I want the LEO's to fix the problem.

    We have millions of tons of hazardous chemicals manufactured and shipped all over this nation daily. Most of the safety procedures work most of the time. And those procedures get better and better each decade.

    So, I'm not gonna jump on a bunch of contractors for the EPA or the State or even a gold-mining company making a mistake. Especially since it doesn't appear to be an event that will create mass casualties.

    Yah, that might not be a popular view here, but popularity among a very vocal group of conservatives isn't a life goal of mine.
     

    indiucky

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Alpo, I think the issue people are complaining most about is that, it's "**** happens" when the EPA does it, and it's huge fines and lost licenses when a business does it. The EPA is supposed to protect our environment from the poopy Capitalists. Who the hell will protect us from the EPA?

    That makes it NOT "**** happens". If capitalists ****ing up our environment is important enough that we create a whole regulation scheme to prevent it, then there should be consequences when the preventers **** it up. I don't know what the consequences should be. Can't fine them. It's not MY fault they ****ed up. I shouldn't have to pay for it. Probably at least some high level people should lose their cushy jobs.

    I am proud of you Jamil....That may not be a popular view here but popularity among a very vocal group of Liberals is a lofty goal...(You know...Trying to find things we can agree on..) They push the Green agenda every chance they get and it is nice to see someone on the Conservative side take the side of the Mother Earth when it's so (obviously) called for...God Bless you...The fish and the salamanders can't speak so thank you for speaking for them.....:)

    I am sorry I smashed your guitar that time...I get it now....:)

    [video=youtube;NqpNQ9AJYgU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqpNQ9AJYgU[/video]

    I look forward to shaking your hand one day brother....
     
    Last edited:

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    I would suspect that if this had been a "disaster", a bunch of EPA heads would have rolled. That might satisfy the bloodlust of some. Perhaps not.

    What the EPA has done post-breech has been better than prior years. Admission that they made a mistake, lots of testing, public disclosure and, as things stand now, no continuing crisis.

    And, at the end of day, we still have 100's of mines that have been abandoned and need remedial action. Should we wait for a republican congress to get things done the proper conservative way?

    Oh....wait......
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    No continuing crisis? The effluent from the mine is still flowing into the river. All they did was put in a settling pond in the hopes that some of the heavier particulate matter in the would get left behind. In the meantime all the millions of gallons they released are headed downstream. Ranchers and farmers and the Navajo nation are being affected by it and the EPA has said it may well be a decade before the waterways are clean again. Yeah, no continuing crisis.
     
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Aug 14, 2009
    3,816
    63
    Salem
    Awww crap... I'm about to agree with mrj... (gasp)

    mrj, you must remember, it's ONLY ranchers , farmers and Navajos... right? (note my sarcasm).

    Alpo - you need to eat your own dog food, sir.

    If it's a crisis when industry does it, it's a crisis when the EPA does it. Heads should roll in both cases, at least somewhat even handedly.

    And if I lived downstream (see the aforementioned farmers, ranchers, Navajo Nation et al)., I would for damn sure consider it a crisis.

    #NavajoLivesMatter (not to put too fine a point on it... :D )
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,788
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Awww crap... I'm about to agree with mrj... (gasp)

    mrj, you must remember, it's ONLY ranchers , farmers and Navajos... right? (note my sarcasm).

    Alpo - you need to eat your own dog food, sir.

    If it's a crisis when industry does it, it's a crisis when the EPA does it. Heads should roll in both cases, at least somewhat even handedly.

    You said it more succinctly than I did.
     

    oldpink

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 7, 2009
    6,660
    63
    Farmland
    I don't think the EPA is blameless. And they overreach in many many areas. As to this incident, particularly, S*** happens. It probably won't be the last sludge dam breech in the high country. I used to live about 10 miles from the government's plutonium trigger plant. And the Rocky Mountain Arsenal had all kinds of nasty biologic and chemical WMD's that polluted their site (ground and groundwater) outside of Denver. So, no, I don't think I hold the government blameless in a variety of circumstances.

    I do think there are enough bad examples in industry that they need oversight. The arguments here are to deflect away from that role by examining government failures. It doesn't solve the basic problem which is that industry needs to be as green as it can. Shipping the problem overseas to put the lives of the population and employees in jeopardy "over there" isn't the answer. Industry self-regulation has worked in some/many circumstances. Not in all.

    So, some balance needs to be set between the idea that capitalists, acting in their own interests, will do the right thing for the environment and the communities in which these businesses operate. A license to do business not a lifetime exemption to seek a profit at the expense of killing your neighbors.

    At long last, reason pokes through.
    No one is saying free reign to pollute should be how it's done.
    However, I would just point out that this particular mine was said in the news reports to have been closed over a century ago, long before there even was such a thing as an EPA or much (if any) in the way of regulations.
    If those news reports about when it closed are accurate, it's mighty tough to pin this on a rogue mine flouting environmental regulations.
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    The EPA has said they are responsible. There will be reimbursement. Fortunately, for them, they have taken samples from the water downstream of the spills so they can establish a baseline of contamination related to the spill and determine when the rivers return to pre-spill levels.

    Apparently, this mine was discharging 500 gpm prior to the breech, so in the interest of arriving at a factual basis, it looks like the EPA was attempting to stem that discharge rate.

    Does anyone know what color arsenic and lead are when in a suspension?
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    At long last, reason pokes through.
    No one is saying free reign to pollute should be how it's done.
    However, I would just point out that this particular mine was said in the news reports to have been closed over a century ago, long before there even was such a thing as an EPA or much (if any) in the way of regulations.
    If those news reports about when it closed are accurate, it's mighty tough to pin this on a rogue mine flouting environmental regulations.

    Yes, this mine was closed. My understanding is that another mine in the same area was operating until recently. That mine was closed and sealed, causing water to migrate through fissures into other mines, thereby raising their water levels and causing them to begin to discharge effluents where they had been in a relatively "dormant" state in the past.
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    Long before the accident, mines in the Silverton area that were first developed in the late 1800s had been releasing steady streams of contaminated wastewater into area creeks, leaving some of them virtually lifeless. No fish swim where the runoff from the Gold King mine flows into Cement Creek and the upper reaches of the Animas River, which in turn feeds the San Juan River.One week after the spill, the EPA said runoff had returned to its normal levels of about 213 gallons per minute. Agency cleanup crews hastily built a series of four sedimentation ponds, bulldozing mounds of earth and covering pits in plastic, to clean the runoff from the mine before it drains into the creek.
    The agency said Wednesday that the ponds were reducing acidity and dissolved metals and that the runoff is now cleaner than it was before the spill. The ponds brimmed with yellow-tinted runoff outside the old mine, located 11,300 feet high in the Rocky Mountains.



    From the article...below the headline.


    As to the Navajo Nation, they've had continuing high pollution from coal fired energy plants on their land. Particular problems are noted with mercury. There was a multi-billion dollar settlement with Anadarko re; abandoned uranium mines.
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    tumblr_lt6jdq54bm1r304n0o1_500.jpg
     
    Top Bottom