Why so many people believe the election was rigged

[ancjr]

How about that Mark Taylor fella?

 

[oze]

Another "Kraken"? Sorry if I'm skeptical, but we've heard this story before...

Unfortunately, I am with you, Doggy. As much as I wish it were true.

 

[ancjr]

Mark Taylor said that God told him there would be military style tribunals during the Trump presidency that would go on for years over the corruption of the Obama and Clinton administrations.

(just a bit of trivia for ya)

 

[BugI02]

Another "Kraken"? Sorry if I'm skeptical, but we've heard this story before...

I've always thought that the whole 'kraken' thing turned out to be so ridiculous possibly because they were trying to make someone react and move information hurriedly in such a way that it could be intercepted or traced

Like you, I'm skeptical, but it would be nice if one of these things actually lived up to its billing

 

[Ingomike]

When I see people going to jail, then I'll start believing. Until then, not so much. I do believe there was fraud. I just don't believe anything will ever be done about it. Tired of getting my hopes up.

Why does this have to be the standard of evidence?

 

[jamil]

Why does this have to be the standard of evidence?

I mean. Give me something as a foundation. I don't need to see people going to jail to believe someone did something worthy of jail. It's not all the deserving people in DC ever see jail time. But I kinda need some verifiable facts. I mean, I'm not gonna start believing some story just because a General claims some fanciable story, for example.

But if there are accusations made, and go advertising it as "we're gonna release the Kraken any day now!" And then nothing of import ever happens, why should I believe they every had anything? Why should I believe any of the claims? Why does there have to be NO standard of evidence?

 

[ancjr]

I mean. Give me something as a foundation. I don't need to see people going to jail to believe someone did something worthy of jail. It's not all the deserving people in DC ever see jail time. But I kinda need some verifiable facts. I mean, I'm not gonna start believing some story just because a General claims some fanciable story, for example.

But if there are accusations made, and go advertising it as "we're gonna release the Kraken any day now!" And then nothing of import ever happens, why should I believe they every had anything? Why should I believe any of the claims? Why does there have to be NO standard of evidence?

It makes them look as stupid as Schiff is what it does.

 

[KG1]

I mean. Give me something as a foundation. I don't need to see people going to jail to believe someone did something worthy of jail. It's not all the deserving people in DC ever see jail time. But I kinda need some verifiable facts. I mean, I'm not gonna start believing some story just because a General claims some fanciable story, for example.

But if there are accusations made, and go advertising it as "we're gonna release the Kraken any day now!" And then nothing of import ever happens, why should I believe they every had anything? Why should I believe any of the claims? Why does there have to be NO standard of evidence?

It's all about the hype anymore to grab attention. That ain't good enough no matter who does it.

 

[Ingomike]

I mean. Give me something as a foundation. I don't need to see people going to jail to believe someone did something worthy of jail. It's not all the deserving people in DC ever see jail time. But I kinda need some verifiable facts. I mean, I'm not gonna start believing some story just because a General claims some fanciable story, for example.

But if there are accusations made, and go advertising it as "we're gonna release the Kraken any day now!" And then nothing of import ever happens, why should I believe they every had anything? Why should I believe any of the claims? Why does there have to be NO standard of evidence?

I agree with most of this if not all. What is the standard to start an investigation of an employee suspected of embezzlement? Dozens of occurrences in multiple states have been alleged and no authority will investigate. Why? What is the standard to force an investigation?

Back to standard of evidence, isn’t over 100k voters over 100 years old voting seem unusual? I do not even know of a person 100 years old in the circle of people I know, maybe you know a dozen, but it certainly seems odd to me and worth of investigation…

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Next 24 hours…

Michael Flynn: Massive, Nationwide Corruption Is about to Be Exposed

'It will get national attention in the next 24 hours,' General Flynn reveals - Former National Security Advisor Gen. Michael Flynn has issued a statement revealing that massive... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Why does this have to be the standard of evidence?

I'm just tired of these people promising, "This time for sure!" and then... nada.

 

[flightsimmer]

Why do so many people believe that the election was rigged?

Because it was!

You trying to tell me that a candidate who draws tens of thousands to his rallies was beat by a senile old man that couldn't fill a small parking lot with cars. ("Come on man"), I'm not stupid.

 

[Ingomike]

I'm just tired of these people promising, "This time for sure!" and then... nada.

So you cannot believe the election was stolen unless people go to jail or are hanging?

 

[DoggyDaddy]

So you cannot believe the election was stolen unless people go to jail or are hanging?

No, I'm saying I'm tired of people like Flynn saying "There's going to be a huge bombshell dropped that will prove everything within 24 hours" and then... nothing. Either he has the evidence or he doesn't. If he has it, show it. It really is that simple. If not then I'm gonna have to assume he's just blowing smoke.

 

[ancjr]

Plus, there was voter suppression even with record turnout. It's like they think the bigger lie they tell, the better.

Edit: The only voter suppression was fake voters getting in the way of real voters.

 

[Ingomike]

No, I'm saying I'm tired of people like Flynn saying "There's going to be a huge bombshell dropped that will prove everything within 24 hours" and then... nothing. Either he has the evidence or he doesn't. If he has it, show it. It really is that simple. If not then I'm gonna have to assume he's just blowing smoke.

Yes , I tired of what appears to be people using this to gain attention to other issues..

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Yes , I tired of what appears to be people using this to gain attention to other issues..

Exactly, and it really does more harm than good when it comes to having anything truly investigated. The boy who cried wolf comes to mind.

 

[ancjr]

Yes , I tired of what appears to be people using this to gain attention to other issues..

What are the other issues?

 

[Ingomike]

What are the other issues?

Flynn being stripped of an honorary degree is the latest…

 

[ancjr]

Flynn being stripped of an honorary degree is the latest…

Boo hoo.

Edit: Not that I don't care. It's just that I think there are bigger issues.