On the weapon. It is much more easier to shoot that way than any other method for me. I have used other methods prior to having pistols with rails. But weapon mounted is much more beneficial for me.For leo personnel, with serious experience. Would you rather have the light mounted to the underbarrell or use the Harries method? To me the light gives you something to shoot at. But don't really know. The only experience I have, which isn't practical, is nvgs with floodlight etc.
We had lights mounted on our rifles but used handhelds with our handguns and that’s what I have stuck with especially as a retired earth person.For leo personnel, with serious experience. Would you rather have the light mounted to the underbarrell or use the Harries method? To me the light gives you something to shoot at. But don't really know. The only experience I have, which isn't practical, is nvgs with floodlight etc.
Respectfully Here is just a thought for those that are suggesting using both a WML and a Handheld for “identification” That works great in a 1 dimensional scenario where you think you’re just identifying and that’s all.
I love MOUT. There is no greater thrill, to me, than kicking down a door you have no idea what is waiting on the other side. With that, I definitely never liked being first, second, or last. I am definitely a firm believer in compression switches, when they work. I find it very interesting to hear other people's tactics, techniques, and procedures.
Yes a handheld is for identifying a target/ or more importantly if something is a threat. OK it’s a threat you usually as a civilian (or LEO) if you are at low ready with the handgun in one hand and right that moment you have accessed THREAT and a SHOT is JUSTIFIED you are going to go to Harries or some other method more than likely over dropping your handheld.
At least that’s the outcome in most of the low light training stuff at FLETC I observed teaching several classes. The ones that dropped the handheld ended up getting lit up or sometimes momentarily blinded as everyone is running 500 plus lumens lights now.
And having a handgun drawn at low ready is not always an option as a civilian so lots of variables.
There is no right or wrong answer just some discussion and observations I have sen/had myself and with some fellow Agency Instructor at FLETC and the local
Again respectfully. That’s a great technique IF you are justified to have a firearm out of the holster.If you have a good weapon light, you do not have to point it at an unknown target/area. The light should have enough candella/lumens, to "splash" the light on the area from the low ready. If you’re working with a "Harries" or some other similar technique, the same is true. the weapon should be at the low ready with the available light splashing the area.
With who? I have trained with well over a dozen well known (relatively speaking) trainers and many of them have wildly different opinions on this. When you look at the student shootings from Rangemaster all of them that had their gun were victorious yet last I knew none used a light. When you watch the videos on ASP of shootouts, I can't think of one I have seen where a light made a difference in a civilian encounter. That's not to say it has never happened but it surely isn't common.Yes, defensive firearms need lights. Get training
I agree with everything you said. I thought it was a given thay one was justified in havingthe weapon out of the holster. That is why one should also carry a good hand held light.Again respectfully. That’s a great technique IF you are justified to have a firearm out of the holster.
Outside of your home or own property 99.8% of the time one is not probably questionable on if they should be running around with a low ready gun.
And no a low ready your not pointing but nothing good usually comes from running around with it out in normal earth people use if a firearm situations.
As far as outside the home if you have yet to identify, is it a threat? Just because someone is there is that alone a threat? Better be right about it or it could not be a good day!!!
This might be the most practical and useful advice in this thread. I don't use an optic and hadn't considered this. I'm confident my preferred handheld light technique would cause exactly the problem you describe.One thing to consider for those who are using a pistol mounted optic and relying on a handheld for illumination...have you tried it in the dark with your setup and observed what it does to the dot? There are certain handheld techniques that are awesome for iron sights that will illuminate the back of your optic glass and make the dot impossible to see. It's worth doing a little practice in the dark to make sure you know what works and what doesn't ahead of time so you don't get surprised if you have to do it for real.