No.HoughMade, thank you for your explanations from your experiences. Not to change the subject, but any of the judges on this case also involved in the past Indy experience a few years back?
No.HoughMade, thank you for your explanations from your experiences. Not to change the subject, but any of the judges on this case also involved in the past Indy experience a few years back?
Should be safe - we don't have those here in Fort Wayne.How long before Judge Gull is accosted in a White Castle parking lot at 0300?
It appears that this issue (public vs. confidential filing) is well on its way to being a non-issue. The Judge has ordered that almost everything be made publicly available on the docket. The majority of the documents at issue were marked confidential right after the case was originally filed. Those were made available to the public months ago on a website, but the clerk never officially put them on the electronic docket. That was ordered to be done. However, the "Franks hearing" filings and most exhibits were deemed "confidential" because they needed to be redacted as to certain information in them according the Indiana Administrative Rules. They will continue to be held as confidential until the current attorneys decide whether to pursue that issue and if so, they need to file redacted versions which comply with the rules.I find the whole accusation of making things the defense filed confidential, meaning only the court and parties to the case can access it- weird.
It's like they said the quiet part out loud that being: "we really want to get all this Odinist stuff into the media so they can run with it."
There is not a "routine" process for attorney disqualification."But I've seen lawyers disqualified and there is a process for that, and it's not this...."
I didn't see J. Gull respond to that (in the released transcript). If the process for her actions are routine court processes, why deviate? Why hesitate to explain her deviation?
Look, maybe the defense attorny(s) are complete loons, pushing the legal evelope past its limit. If so, she should state such, plainly with specifics. A vague off-record phone call two weeks prior to what can best be described as a threatening ambush, puts her in a bad light at best.
sidering disqualifying them, the reasons, and setting a deadline for the parties to file responses at least a week before the hearing. The order, confidential at that stage, would state that at the hearing the Court would be setting forth all of the reasons why disqualification was being considered.
I must have misunderstood. I thought your motion, response, reply, hearing, decision was the procedural norm for disqualification. I always look forward to your input on this thread. Since you studied all of the latin and know the inside baseball, your input is valued by me.There is not a "routine" process for attorney disqualification.
That being said, I would have had more process.
Ahem:So no opportunity for the defence to hear the reasons in advance, and prepare? If someone accused me of doing something wrong last November, I would need time to go back through emails, documents etc. I've seen this happen in non-legal work settings before, where someone confronts a subordinate with a long list of grievances, and maintains that this is their opportunity to respond, right now, or else they must accept judgement. I've always considered that "ambushing" and this looks exactly the same to me. Maybe it works differently in legal settings but I can definitely relate to what Rozzi is saying here.
Ahem:
"I would have leaned towards setting a hearing explicitly on the disqualification issue (made explicit to the parties, not the public) telling the defense attorneys that I was considering disqualifying them, the reasons, and setting a deadline for the parties to file responses at least a week before the hearing. "
Also, as I said, the Judge and both defense attorneys acknowledged that 2 weeks prior to the chambers conversation they discussed disqualification. I would have set a deadline to file responses, but clearly they were at least on notice of the issue.
And the hits just keep on coming!
Judge overseeing Delphi murders case against Richard Allen suffers ‘urgent medical condition’
https://fox59.com/indiana-news/judg...chard-allen-suffers-urgent-medical-condition/
Could've been Loki.Last know whereabouts of odin???
Yeah, I think that's more of a Loki thing.Could've been Loki.