Trump 2024 — The second term

[KG1]

What are our federal house of representatives supposed to represent first and foremost? The constitution. If a homeowner wants to have a strip club in his house dors the rep represent them or the covenants? One point of the board is to ensure the covenants that everyone agreed to are followed.

Don't want to follow covenants, don’t join an HOA.

Strip club? Seriously?

 

[jamil]

What are our federal house of representatives supposed to represent first and foremost? The constitution. If a homeowner wants to have a strip club in his house dors the rep represent them or the covenants? One point of the board is to ensure the covenants that everyone agreed to are followed.

Don't want to follow covenants, don’t join an HOA.

Or join the HOA board and be the change you want. Thwart the Karens. And they’re usually Karens.

 

[jamil]

Strip club? Seriously?

I would not have voted to allow a strip club in the neighborhood. For the record.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

I would not have voted to allow a strip club in the neighborhood. For the record.

Really?

 

[KG1]

I would not have voted to allow a strip club in the neighborhood. For the record.

If that were the case, and there was a breach of covenant I would've had to confront the homeowner in person. For at least an hour.

Relax everybody. It was just a joke.

 

[Ingomike]

Strip club? Seriously?

I should have said swingers club. That has popped up several times in the past few years. Here is one I quickly found.

'Naughty Neighbors' face HOA lawsuit

Residents allege Texas man and his wife are operating a swingers club at their home.

www.usatoday.com

 

[KG1]

I should have said swingers club. That has popped up several times in the past few years. Here is one I quickly found.

'Naughty Neighbors' face HOA lawsuit

Residents allege Texas man and his wife are operating a swingers club at their home.

www.usatoday.com

This example is a bit different and to the extreme. I don't think jamil would represent the homeowner in such a case. He was pretty much talking about a fence issue and an HOA Karen going overboard.

 

[Ingomike]

I always voted in favor of the homeowners.

I don't think jamil would represent the homeowner in such a case.

So you don’t believe his BS either?

 

[Route 45]

What did the legal documents say? That is the final authority. If they did not address the issue in the covenants then the homeowner was in the right if not the HOA was. That simple. I have zero respect for anyone that agrees to a contract and fails to follow their agreement and even less for those that no only agree to a contract but join a board to subvert the legal processes. A guy like that sounds like the jerk politicians you complain about…

How do you feel about bankruptcy? Or marriage vows?

 

[jamil]

I should have said swingers club. That has popped up several times in the past few years. Here is one I quickly found.

'Naughty Neighbors' face HOA lawsuit

Residents allege Texas man and his wife are operating a swingers club at their home.

www.usatoday.com

Oh. Now I’d have voted against the HOA on that one. Freedom of association. None of Karen’s business. I don’t believe I found any language that construed something like that as against the bylaws.

 

[jamil]

Alright. Not that I don’t enjoy a good diversion, haven’t we done HOA’s enough? I’m more interested in the story about McCarthy endorsing Trump.

Now wasn’t it the Trumpers who claim guilt by association? Prolly won’t want to stick with that criteria here, eh?

 

[foszoe]

Does the HOA board instruct their volunteers to act like raging maniacs and stalk the homeowner, sticking their face in their doorbell cameras? Seems like a registered letter might be the way to go instead.

Dude looked like a cyclist also.

 

[KG1]

Oh. Now I’d have voted against the HOA on that one. Freedom of association. None of Karen’s business. I don’t believe I found any language that construed something like that as against the bylaws.

In the article the HOA alleges that they were running a business and that's against the bylaws. Now I think they still would've raised a stink about the swingers gathering at the residence in their neighbored if it wasn't a business.

 

[jamil]

In the article the HOA alleges that they were running a business and that's against the bylaws. Now I think they still would've raised a stink about the swingers gathering at the residence in their neighbored if it wasn't a business.

A swinger’s club as a business? I dunno. They might have alleged it.

 

[KG1]

A swinger’s club as a business? I dunno. They might have alleged it.

Well in the article it says that the HOA has some proof to back up thier allegation.

 

[Ingomike]

Oh. Now I’d have voted against the HOA on that one. Freedom of association. None of Karen’s business. I don’t believe I found any language that construed something like that as against the bylaws.

And somehow, only on INGO, I am the one out there because I like well constructed covenants as to how the neighborhood agrees to maintain their properties.

Funny KG1 brought up cyclists, at the end of the day it is largely the same posters that are intolerant of cyclists that are also intolerant of those voluntarily agreeing to covenants and HOA’s…

 

[Ingomike]

A swinger’s club as a business? I dunno. They might have alleged it.

Well constructed covenants often cover things like frequent gatherings of any kind, swingers or prayer meeting and things like weekly garage sales…

 

[KG1]

And somehow, only on INGO, I am the one out there because I like well constructed covenants as to how the neighborhood agrees to maintain their properties.

Funny KG1 brought up cyclists, at the end of the day it is largely the same posters that are intolerant of cyclists that are also intolerant of those voluntarily agreeing to covenants and HOA’s…

Ummm. Might wanna check again. I wasn't the one that brought up the cyclists or HOAs for that matter. I've never even participated in those threads as a matter of fact.

 

[jamil]

And somehow, only on INGO, I am the one out there because I like well constructed covenants as to how the neighborhood agrees to maintain their properties.

Funny KG1 brought up cyclists, at the end of the day it is largely the same posters that are intolerant of cyclists that are also intolerant of those voluntarily agreeing to covenants and HOA’s…

**** HOA’s. A bunch of snooty people trying to find ways to gain and assert authority.

But it seems like we’re just gonna have to beat this subject to death before we talk about Trump’s guilt by association.

 

[jamil]

Funny KG1 brought up cyclists, at the end of the day it is largely the same posters that are intolerant of cyclists that are also intolerant of those voluntarily agreeing to covenants and HOA’s…

Are you complaining that anti-dickheads are being consistent?