The story behind the most lethal sniper of all-time

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Fullmag

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Sep 4, 2011
    1,956
    74
    I thought this was gonna be about Carlos Hitchcock, so I learned something new today, thanks.
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,032
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5CaQ37VYvw[/ame]

    For historical reference:

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwQmwbQttkY&NR=1&feature=endscreen[/ame]
     
    Last edited:

    FrankTank83

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 26, 2013
    61
    6
    Indianapolis, IN
    Interesting read, thanks! Any idea what they meant by "the sniper took an exploding bullet to the jaw". Did the Soviet Union have such a thing or do you think they meant "expanding" instead of "exploding"?
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,032
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Any idea what they meant by "the sniper took an exploding bullet to the jaw". Did the Soviet Union have such a thing or do you think they meant "expanding" instead of "exploding"?

    Movie puffery, Frank.

    The bullet entered the hinge of the jaw (his zyogmatic bone was destroyed I believe IIRC) and the temp cavity acted as if an "explosion" ruptured his face.

    What got Simo was likely your standard .31 caliber 148 grain lead core or the Heavy D .31 caliber 182 grain bullet.

    Here is Hayha pre-injury (he was a shorter male):



    Here he is post-injury:




    He lived this way well into his 90s. He was rock hard prior to his service and continued to live a vigorous life after the Wars of Continuation.

    Remember this when people speak of "killing power". .31 caliber to the face and he lived.
     

    FrankTank83

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 26, 2013
    61
    6
    Indianapolis, IN
    Movie puffery, Frank.

    The bullet entered the hinge of the jaw (his zyogmatic bone was destroyed I believe IIRC) and the temp cavity acted as if an "explosion" ruptured his face.

    What got Simo was likely your standard .31 caliber 148 grain lead core or the Heavy D .31 caliber 182 grain bullet.

    Here is Hayha pre-injury (he was a shorter male):



    Here he is post-injury:




    He lived this way well into his 90s. He was rock hard prior to his service and continued to live a vigorous life after the Wars of Continuation.

    Remember this when people speak of "killing power". .31 caliber to the face and he lived.
    Thanks for the clarification, what an amazing story!
     

    Prometheus

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 20, 2008
    4,462
    48
    Northern Indiana
    It's Carlos Hathcock, and while he is a legend, he doesn't approach being the most lethal.

    Each man and each way they operated and the targets they had can't be compared.

    For example trying to compare The Finn and the most 'lethal' or longest shot of Afghanistan is night and day. Not just in terms of optics vs iron sights but conditions in which they operated. I don't recall the exact scenario but the Canadian sniper team claiming the longest kill from a rooftop perch on some random jihadist, while a technical feat, doesn't hold a candle to what that Finn was doing. Likewise, it doesn't hold a candle to one of Carlos' famous jungle shots on a high ranking target either.

    You really can't lay an solid parameters for determining who was more lethal or best. Raw numbers on people killed mean little when they are plucking grunts/terrorists off a dime a dozen across open terrain with little chance of reprisal from them when compared to guys who have to lay still or move 100 yards over the span of a couple of hours to take one single shot.

    The word sniper can sometimes be used like assault-weapon.

    Not to lessen the feats of any particular person, just pointing out that a simple body count or longest shot means little when you are talking about the entire craft.
     

    Indy_Guy_77

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Apr 30, 2008
    16,576
    48
    Each man and each way they operated and the targets they had can't be compared.

    For example trying to compare The Finn and the most 'lethal' or longest shot of Afghanistan is night and day. Not just in terms of optics vs iron sights but conditions in which they operated. I don't recall the exact scenario but the Canadian sniper team claiming the longest kill from a rooftop perch on some random jihadist, while a technical feat, doesn't hold a candle to what that Finn was doing. Likewise, it doesn't hold a candle to one of Carlos' famous jungle shots on a high ranking target either.

    You really can't lay an solid parameters for determining who was more lethal or best. Raw numbers on people killed mean little when they are plucking grunts/terrorists off a dime a dozen across open terrain with little chance of reprisal from them when compared to guys who have to lay still or move 100 yards over the span of a couple of hours to take one single shot.

    The word sniper can sometimes be used like assault-weapon.

    Not to lessen the feats of any particular person, just pointing out that a simple body count or longest shot means little when you are talking about the entire craft.

    Exactly. It's like a "caliber war" or "which gun is best"...

    Well...it depends!

    Depends on the mission, the parameters, the outcome, etc etc etc.

    Mountainous, snowy, extremely cold climates, defending your homeland vs. the hot, damp, stinky jungles of Vietnam fighting people defending THEIR homeland vs. basically wide-open terrain target-rich environments with the full might of the most technically advanced armed forces all around you (not at all saying not dangerous. If the enemy is in range, YOU are also in range of them)

    Hathcock was the Godfather of "modern sniping" as far as the US Armed services is concerned. After WWII - most Powers that Be didn't care to continue the craft. Hathcock's work, basically on his own, changed "their" minds - eventually.

    I think, though, that the Russians and Fins really started the trend of using sharpshooters as asymmetric offensive weapons.

    Fascinating history of the art (and I believe it truly is an art). Colorful players in a terrible game.

    -J-
     

    boozoo

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jan 21, 2009
    833
    16
    NE Indy
    And he did it all with a Mosin-Nagant...an amazing accomplishment.

    Finn'd Mosins like he had are a bit better breed, although a 91/30 *can* be tweaked up really well (I have an old Russian article buried somewhere in my archives).

    I forget, but weren't a large number of his kills also credited to non-sniper action with a Suomi? He was just a bad bad man.... I remember reading once when asked how he got to be so accurate, he had a rather lengthy response....

    "Practice"
     

    boozoo

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jan 21, 2009
    833
    16
    NE Indy
    I could have sworn it was the M28 or 28/30 that he used.

    Not a whole lot of difference between those models, but compared to a Russian m91 or m91/30, they did have new heavier barrels, stocks and better sights. Plus they made tweaks to the action over the years. M39's had two stage triggers and magazine tweaks, for instance.

    My last M39 shot just about as well as my Swiss K31, and I suspect the difference was ammo quality since I was using whatever surplus I had on hand.

    And yet no matter how good the rifle, I suspect I will never ever shoot as well as Hayha. :):
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,032
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Simo, as a shorter male (5'3"), used an iron-sighted M28 which he found handier for a man his size.

    Remember at the time this happened:

    Simo grew up outdoors in the sisu culture of Finland. Skiing and hiking made him tough. Simo was a shooter before he joined the service. He was a great patriot and the Soviets had attacked his country. The Finns understood extreme cold weather conditions, especially the importance of high carb and protein hot food (oatmeal and black sausage).

    No greater weapon than a man with the will and the skill; couple it with a culture that expects one to have "guts" and you have an ideal soldier.
     
    Top Bottom