Whoa there cowboy. I’m not the one channeling the Palpatine “soon it will be time” nonsense. I’m an independent contractor.Will you be on Kut's porch or will he be on yours?
Whoa there cowboy. I’m not the one channeling the Palpatine “soon it will be time” nonsense. I’m an independent contractor.Will you be on Kut's porch or will he be on yours?
Until I start seeing people get shot for things like igniting buildings full of people I will consider federal law enforcement hostile partisan actors. Simple as that.It’s no more a death penalty for that as a death penalty for someone breaking into your house. But there are certain activities that one can engage in that increases the likelihood of being shot, whether by police or, say, a home owner. Maybe the thief wasn’t armed, and was no threat at all. But the homeowner doesn’t know that.
I’m not saying that she deserved to be shot. But she was. Saying that she was at least a little responsible for the outcome is not the same thing as saying she deserved it. I think that officer who shot her should be fired. As I’ve been saying, it was a hasty shot. That’s his responsibility in it. Her’s was being there, breaking the law and putting herself in that position.
Lando with a light splash of Boba Fett, right?Whoa there cowboy. I’m not the one channeling the Palpatine “soon it will be time” nonsense. I’m an independent contractor.
I believe you are arguing a different point from that which some of us are making. All things being equal I would agree. Under the circumstances, if there are no rules for BLM, then no rules for anyoneNot trying to be unsympathetic here, but I can see the justification for shooting the whole ****ing bunch of rioters in the building. I think Kut is right that a lot of folks on here would be saying "play stupid games..." if a blm commie had got shot doing the exact same thing in the Capitol Building.
I also think Kut is right about the lefties being a real physical threat while the right is just talk.
Nothing to see here Mr fed, just some big talk.
Time for the feds to pull their provacateurs out of our groups because we are not a real threat.
I dont think this is true. I think the no rules does apply to anyone in a large enough group. The difference here is that there was a threat to politicians in the Capitol. If the Jan 6th rioters had stormed a local shopping center imo it would have been a lot different.I believe you are arguing a different point from that which some of us are making. All things being equal I would agree. Under the circumstances, if there are no rules for BLM, then no rules for anyone
We're talking about a mob of people who broke through windows, doors and police barricades.
I get that a lot. I often misunderstand things.I believe you are arguing a different point from that which some of us are making. All things being equal I would agree. Under the circumstances, if there are no rules for BLM, then no rules for anyone
I didnt say anything about the damage to the building being the concern. I said there was a large threat to the people inside who's lives are more important to the government than mine or yours.Aww, such damage. Have you seen Minneapolis?
Some wearing body armor and chanting "hang Mike Pence!", they knew they were engaged in illegal activities that could get them shot.I dont think this is true. I think the no rules does apply to anyone in a large enough group. The difference here is that there was a threat to politicians in the Capitol. If the Jan 6th rioters had stormed a local shopping center imo it would have been a lot different.
We're talking about a mob of people who broke through windows, doors and police barricades. Some with makeshift weapons/ shields, some with zip tie cuffs. They did this while the 2nd most important person in the country was in the building. IMO its a miracle more people werent shot.
No need to be such a drama queen. I'm sure they can find the money to fix a couple doors and windows.I didnt say anything about the damage to the building being the concern. I said there was a large threat to the people inside who's lives are more important to the government than mine or yours.
edit: Your "Aww, such damage" comment is disgusting. Its not an autozone. That building is a symbol of this great nation, and the freedoms we have.
No need to be a hyperbole queen. I am sure some people from the left are suffering some penalty somewhere.You see, the left is allowed to commit their crimes like looting and arson and there is no penalty whatsoever. That means they can go out and do it again and again and burn cities or anything and there is no penalty whatsoever. They don't have to worry about the police, the liberal district attorneys or the liberal judges. They might even be getting paid to commit crimes. That fools some people into thinking that about the left.
Do you have a link? All I hear, even from the leftist media, is mass releases with no charges, no consequences.No need to be a hyperbole queen. I am sure some people from the left are suffering some penalty somewhere.
I didnt say anything about the damage to the building being the concern. I said there was a large threat to the people inside who's lives are more important to the government than mine or yours.
edit: Your "Aww, such damage" comment is disgusting. Its not an autozone. That building is a symbol of this great nation, and the freedoms we have.
So you accept the politicians as a de facto nobility?I didnt say anything about the damage to the building being the concern. I said there was a large threat to the people inside who's lives are more important to the government than mine or yours.
edit: Your "Aww, such damage" comment is disgusting. Its not an autozone. That building is a symbol of this great nation, and the freedoms we have.
Do you have a link? All I hear, even from the leftist media, is mass releases with no charges, no consequences.
I guess that counts. There really is a tiny handful of people that had to pay a tiny fine. Justice lives.Protesters arrested during Huntsville Black Lives Matter protest go to court
Five pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct. Two were found guilty of disorderly conduct, and one was found not guilty.www.waaytv.com
Who knows for sure, I only had to find one to negate the claim.I guess that counts. There really is a tiny handful of people that had to pay a tiny fine. Justice lives.
How many buildings burned down again?