We already deploy ground-based robots and helicopters in tactical events, what's the difference, other than cost and safety of a pilot?
(Side note, the ground based robots are very unimpressive to look at. I really thought I was going to see Johnny 5 the first time I heard "we're going to deploy the robot.")
We already deploy ground-based robots and helicopters in tactical events, what's the difference, other than cost and safety of a pilot?
(Side note, the ground based robots are very unimpressive to look at. I really thought I was going to see Johnny 5 the first time I heard "we're going to deploy the robot.")
Nothing surprising here, natural progression to totalitarianism.
Ok, run this by me. How is a flying camera a step in the progression to totalitarianism?
If they put the camera in the cop car, on their uniform, in a helicopter, in a rascal, or on Officer Chompy?
Explain the problem here?
Cameras used to exonerate = good
Cameras used to prosecute = bad
There is a difference between a 'drone' and probably whatever the LAPD is flying.
HOW DARE YOU!!!!!!
Well I've spent a lot of time and a decent chunk of change building my quadcopter
They may be unimpressive to look at but they are fun to use. Especially when you use them to destroy things.