China needs us, we can do without them. They have had their chance to right this situation and have failed to do so.
^^^^^THIS^^^^^Oh, and how many country's has he share this technology with. Like Iran? We don't know, and or we are not saying.
Problem is China.
China has stated that if NK attacks the US, then they will not offer them any assistance.
However, if the US attacks NK or attempts to overthrow the regime, then they will defend them.
If not for China, NK would have been taken care of A LONG TIME AGO.
A war between the US and China is not something anyone in the world would want to happen.
China needs us, we can do without them. They have had their chance to right this situation and have failed to do so.
My take on it is that we have reached the point where it gets real. We can't afford to wait for Little Kim to lob a nuke. Now it the time to tell China we want the problem solved this week, and if they can't do that, we will solve it next week.
I agree. Actually, I feel like it's gone past that point during the Obama administration. Of course, they didn't think so.My take on it is that we have reached the point where it gets real.
Personally, based on the research that I have done (NOT WHAT MSM WEBSITES SAY) I have full confidence in our missile defense systems. I feel that if an ICBM were to be launched, it would be swatted out of the sky before it even finished the boost phase. We have anti-missile systems setup in SK not to mention the mobile ones on our Naval ships. If/when the real deal is launched, I am quite certain it's not going to make it very far, let alone the US mainland.We can't afford to wait for Little Kim to lob a nuke.
I am pretty sure we have done this already. However, the Obama administration was a bit more focused on diplomacy than the current one.Now it the time to tell China we want the problem solved this week, and if they can't do that, we will solve it next week.
With all the one-child families in China now, the Glorious Revolutionaries may have a hard time getting the Little Emperors to go along.True. But one thing they have that we don't is the ablity to loose a few billion life's without much effort. Although I don't know that much of this new generation have the stomach for it like they did in the last Korean war and Vietnam. The youth have had a taste of capitalism. They might resist.
A real focus on diplomacy requires you to have an end state in mind. An objective. A set of conditions. A desired outcome. The Obama administration had none of these except continued talking. And that suited the Little Despot just fine.I am pretty sure we have done this already. However, the Obama administration was a bit more focused on diplomacy than the current one.
So,, we're gonna wake up tomorrow with the news that he's launched another or we've launched on him ?
President Obama's diplomacy was focused on duplicating Neville Chamberlain's "Peace In Our Time"
President Obama's diplomacy was focused on duplicating Neville Chamberlain's "Peace In Our Time"
Looks good to big media, like John Kerry with a face lift.
Chamberlain's plan worked it out in the end!
Sooo, where's the boom there was supposed to be an earth shattering boom ?
*** yum jun dun sed we's gittin a gif package an he's gon lite a nuthur off taday , where's it at ?^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sooo, where's the kaboom there was supposed to be an earth shattering kaboom ? FIFY - you were looking for the wrong type of explosion. John
*** yum jun dun sed we's gittin a gif package an he's gon lite a nuthur off taday , where's it at ?
[video=youtube;KVbCyoIh73Y]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVbCyoIh73Y[/video]