manifest destiny
Master
pfft. chicken **** to even judge the merits. case closed before it was opened.SCOTUS ruled that a state does not have Texas does not have standing to challenge election results of another state. Because they don't.
Here's something interesting. Texas sued those states under the theory that it violated ISL (Independent State Legislature theory) which asserts that state legislatures have sole authority, pretty much regardless of state courts' judicial review, or other state officials. So it seems Ingomike is a proponent of that legal theory. SCOTUS shot that down in 2023 in a gerymandering case in NC. Not only did Texas not have standing, but even if it did, SCOTUS would have had the opportunity to scuttle ISL much sooner than 2023.