Justice Clarence Thomas-Section 230 unconstitutional

[Hatin Since 87]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040521zor_3204.pdf

Social media companies do not have first amendment right to ban protected speech, section 230 unconstitutional

 

[actaeon277]

 

[Magyars]

I always believed the BOR was for "The People" not big business

 

[Kutnupe14]

Well Thomas must be going senile. I’d be damned if govt told me what I had to allow in my private business.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I always believed the BOR was for "The People" not big business

So if you wore a shirt, into Wal-Mart, that most would consider distasteful, you think that management shouldn’t be allowed to ask you to leave, and enforce it if you refuse?

 

[Tombs]

Well Thomas must be going senile. I’d be damned if govt told me what I had to allow in my private business.

I thought democrats valued individual's rights over corporate power?

I guess that depends on which way the wind is blowing on a given day, or rather, who is in office.

 

[Ingomike]

So if you wore a shirt, into Wal-Mart, that most would consider distasteful, you think that management shouldn’t be allowed to ask you to leave, and enforce it if you refuse?

Strawman...

 

[Tombs]

So if you wore a shirt, into Wal-Mart, that most would consider distasteful, you think that management shouldn’t be allowed to ask you to leave, and enforce it if you refuse?

So if you're gay and you want walmart to bake a cake for your wedding, should they be allowed to tell you no?

 

[actaeon277]

And if your electric company drops you because of your posts?

 

[phylodog]

I dunno fellers, this whole being the underdog thing might just be fun for awhile.

 

[Ingomike]

So if you're gay and you want walmart to bake a cake for your wedding, should they be allowed to tell you no?

I hate this argument because there is a line between the services a business provides all customers, like offering a cake that is available for all customers, vs. creating custom art in violation of ones convictions...

 

[Twangbanger]

So if you're gay and you want walmart to bake a cake for your wedding, should they be allowed to tell you no?

Of course he's going to say they "should" be allowed to, because there's no danger of it actually happening. The left-most position already won.

 

[foszoe]

I dunno fellers, this whole being the underdog thing might just be fun for awhile.

I've always enjoyed it

 

[Kutnupe14]

I thought democrats valued individual's rights over corporate power?

I guess that depends on which way the wind is blowing on a given day, or rather, who is in office.

Who said anything about Democrats? Are you trying to steer the conversation elsewhere?

 

[Kutnupe14]

Strawman...

Yeah, kinda not

 

[Kutnupe14]

So if you're gay and you want walmart to bake a cake for your wedding, should they be allowed to tell you no?

Absolutely.

 

[Kutnupe14]

And if your electric company drops you because of your posts?

Now this is where the debate is. In this there is a fine line.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Of course he's going to say they "should" be allowed to, because there's no danger of it actually happening. The left-most position already won.

I said this back when the case was ongoing. I’ve always been in favor of allowing hateful people to discriminate, with only a few exceptions; typically related to health and survival of the person being discriminated against.

 

[BigRed]

So if you're gay and you want walmart to bake a cake for your wedding, should they be allowed to tell you no?

YES

 

[churchmouse]

And if your electric company drops you because of your posts?

But I only have the best posts.....