Is "none of the above" an option?

[dieselrealtor]

Serious question, is this an option for the ballot?
Write in or not?

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Serious question, is this an option for the ballot?
Write in or not?

Basically leaving the choice blank is that option. That's what I did in Indy's mayoral election where my choices were Hogsett and Shreve.

 

[dsol]

There should be a None of the Above option for presidential ballots. If NOTA wins, the candidates are taken out behind the White House, shot in the head and buried (together in each other's arms) in an unmarked grave. Then the parties have 30 days in which to nominate a new candidate and another 30 days for them to campaign. Repeat as necessary until one of the parties comes up with someone to vote for instead of against.

Too extreme?

 

[OneBadV8]

Serious question, is this an option for the ballot?
Write in or not?

you could always vote for RFK Jr, very unlikely he wins, but getting a larger vote could send a message

 

[dieselrealtor]

I was thinking more along the state & local level.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

Too extreme?

This post might even make BigRed blush.



I didnt quote your full message so they dont include me on the watchlist.

 

[Cameramonkey]

There should be a None of the Above option for presidential ballots. If NOTA wins, the candidates are taken out behind the White House, shot in the head and buried (together in each other's arms) in an unmarked grave. Then the parties have 30 days in which to nominate a new candidate and another 30 days for them to campaign. Repeat as necessary until one of the parties comes up with someone to vote for instead of against.

Too extreme?

Yes. They should be buried side by side. LOL

 

[HoughMade]

Basically leaving the choice blank is that option...

 

[dieselrealtor]

none of the above

 

[BigRed]

Serious question, is this an option for the ballot?
Write in or not?

Libertarians will be running a candidate.

 

[BigRed]

There should be a None of the Above option for presidential ballots. If NOTA wins, the candidates are taken out behind the White House, shot in the head and buried (together in each other's arms) in an unmarked grave. Then the parties have 30 days in which to nominate a new candidate and another 30 days for them to campaign. Repeat as necessary until one of the parties comes up with someone to vote for instead of against.

Too extreme?

WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER.

 

[BigRed]

This post might even make BigRed blush.

Nah.

 

[russc2542]

Too extreme?

Not at all, I like it.

 

[Cameramonkey]

Libertarians will be running a candidate.

And at least here in IN, I think its the secretary of state election that determines if they stay on the ballot. SO if you dont care about SOS, throw them a bone and help keep the Ls on the ticket as an alternative to the uniparty. As long as a party gets at least 2% of the vote in that race, they are allowed to run candidates across the board.

 

[2tonic]

Basically leaving the choice blank is that option.

"If you choose not to decide,
You still have made a choice."

Neil Peart...RIP

 

[Ingomike]

Basically leaving the choice blank is that option. That's what I did in Indy's mayoral election where my choices were Hogsett and Shreve.

If you choose not to decide
You still have made a choice
You can choose from phantom fears
And kindness that can kill
I will choose a path that’s clear
I will choose free will.

 

[Ingomike]

Serious question, is this an option for the ballot?
Write in or not?

You are either at the table or on the menu, your choice…

 

[DadSmith]

 

[cg21]

The only perfect candidate will be yourself. So you just have to do the best you can picking who aligns closest to your views. In my case it is Rainwater.

 

[cosermann]

If you leave it blank, it’s kind of a blank check for abuse downstream, isn’t it? In other words, if it’s blank, it seems like it’d be easier for someone to fraudulently fill something in later.