Well he does seem to favor progressive politics.
I also meant to say I giggled a little out loud when I read that phrase "the clauses are irrelevent..."
Your preference for the federal government's riding roughshod over the will of the people and especially religious people is well noted.
"In America, even sincere and long-held religious beliefs do not trump the constitutional rights of those who happen to have been outvoted."
I expected no more from you.Of course they're irrelevant until needed to make his progressive heart seem to jibe with his libertarian head.
Sorry mrjerrell. Just
The clauses are irrelevant, for the most part. Marriage is a Right under the 9th Amendment. Why do you hate peoples Rights so much? The Rights of the individual come before the powers of the state, as it should be. Unless you think the state should be of greater importance? That would explain a few things.
Your preference for the federal government's riding roughshod over the will of the people and especially religious people is well noted.
Your preference for the federal government's riding roughshod over the will of the people and especially religious people is well noted.
Your preference for a majority running roughshod over the rights of a minority via the power of the state is equally noted.
Looks like when it comes to the love of big powerful, government everybody has their favorite flavor.
I always take the side of individual freedom.
Didn't say any such thing. Said that was the reason for the expansion of the ruling, to take into account the catholic stance on contraception, (it's from the article). I have stated no stance on the SCOTUS ruling in the HL case. While I believe that the SCOTUS did create a protected class with this one, by not making the ruling the cover everyone with an objection and that they have likely opened the door to other drugs or procedures being denied because of someones particular religious beliefs.But you said that upholding the 1st amendment to protect religious freedom is nothing more than placating Catholics. Somehow the practice of religion by Catholics is not as worthy of protection in your view. Why do you hate people's rights so much?
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...kes-contraception-mandate-15.html#post5134305
Exactly. The only people who were run over were the LGBT citizens. No-one else has been inconvenienced in any way.Your preference for a majority running roughshod over the rights of a minority via the power of the state is equally noted.
Except for the 9th Amendment and the 14th.I stand on the side of the Constitution.
Except for the 9th Amendment and the 14th.
I stand on the side of the Constitution.
Apparently not since the law in question was found to be against the Constitution.
Nope. They just got it wrong.
Exactly. The only people who were run over were the LGBT citizens. No-one else has been inconvenienced in any way.
Except for the 9th Amendment and the 14th.
Apparently not since the law in question was found to be against the Constitution.