Impeach Trump for the Good of the Country

[jamil]

It's kind of classless to cheer someone's possible death.

Yeah, but even that is dependent on context. Trying to avoid Godwin's Law here, but as consensus solidifies around how universally bad a person is, the more socially acceptable it is to wish or cheer their death. So I suppose classlessness would be the inverse of that. I think it's becoming more socially acceptable to cheer for the demise of people one simply disagrees with by the side that disagrees. Flip sides and it's atrocious behavior.

 

[Doug]

Yeah, but even that is dependent on context. Trying to avoid Godwin's Law here, but as consensus solidifies around how universally bad a person is, the more socially acceptable it is to wish or cheer their death. So I suppose classlessness would be the inverse of that. I think it's becoming more socially acceptable to cheer for the demise of people one simply disagrees with by the side that disagrees. Flip sides and it's atrocious behavior.

No.
In my opinion, it is atrocious behavior to wish for or cheer another person's death.

 

[Sylvain]

 

[phylodog]

How dare a non-leftist attempt to tell people the meaning of words like unity and antithesis. I hope someone followed Rand to set the record straight so as not to leave our nation's "leaders" confused for too long.

 

[Super Bee]

I think he should run for Congress in 2022. Wouldn't that be something to see him bloviate in the belly of the beast on a chamber floor.

And the Republicans take the House and Trump becomes Speaker of the House.

You want to watch Nancy lose her ****ing ****.

 

[Mikey1911]

And the Republicans take the House and Trump becomes Speaker of the House.

You want to watch Nancy lose her ****ing ****.

She may be doing that already (that’s what Depends are for).

 

[IndyBeerman]

She may be doing that already (that’s what Depends are for).

Like Pampers, there's a load limit.

No way in the world is there a industrial quality Depends made to handle that amount of if she was to lose it, cause she's a giant turd with eyes and a mouth that's decorated with a wig and lipstick.

 

[actaeon277]

 

[KG1]

5 RINO's vote against Rand Paul that impeaching a private citizen is unconstitutional.

FIVE Republicans voted with Democrats and against Rand Paul. The list included: Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitt Romney, Ben Sasse and Pat Toomey.

44 voted with Rand Paul. 5 against is well short of the 17 needed to convict. This will go nowhere and is a big waste of time as usual.

 

[KLB]

44 voted with Rand Paul. 5 against is well short of the 17 needed to convict. This will go nowhere and is a big waste of time as usual.

Yep. If someone thinks the whole thing is unconstitutional, I am not sure how they could ever vote to convict.

 

[phylodog]

Yep. If someone thinks the whole thing is unconstitutional, I am not sure how they could ever vote to convict.

The left's perversion of government isn't quite complete thankfully.

 

[KG1]

Yep. If someone thinks the whole thing is unconstitutional, I am not sure how they could ever vote to convict.

And that's not to say that all 5 of those will even vote to convict either. I could see maybe a couple. But still well short anyway you look at it.

 

[jamil]

No.
In my opinion, it is atrocious behavior to wish for or cheer another person's death.

I agree. I’m just describing what’s happening to society. There are circumstances where it’s more and less socially acceptable. That doesn’t mean it’s morally good in absolute terms.

 

[jamil]

If we get to impeach private citizens maybe Zuckerberg should be on the list.

 

[Sylvain]

If we get to impeach private citizens maybe Zuckerberg should be on the list.

What has he done?

 

[jamil]

What has he done?

Pretty much ruined society with algorithms that bring out the worst in people. But that’s not the point.

 

[Sylvain]

Pretty much ruined society with algorithms that bring out the worst in people. But that’s not the point.

I assumed it was just for creating Facebook.

 

[kickbacked]

I hope one day I'll get to see a Rand Paul presidency.

 

[Shootin45super]

We should expect the following scenario.
1. Trump is out of office, Therefore, convicting him and removing him from office is moot.
2. The Senate will now move on to a vote on barring Trump from ever holding office again. This requires a simple majority.

The Constitution allows that only after conviction after impeachment, but since that conviction is moot, they will proceed with the additional punishment.

The problem I have witn this,its our choice who runs and gets elected!
Not the Senates!
WE THE PEOPLE!

 

[Doug]

The problem I have witn this,its our choice who runs and gets elected!
Not the Senates!
WE THE PEOPLE!

As Chuck and Nancy would say, "Bloody Peasant!"