GenPol: Part VI----- Something Something Brandon?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    *newsflash* Biden has a history of not being a truth teller. He's also not a credible source for judging right from wrong.
     

    JEBland

    INGO's least subtle Alphabet agency taskforce spy
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Oct 24, 2020
    1,979
    113
    South of you
    https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/05/court-upholds-california-animal-welfare-law/


    A win for federalism? Mostly unanimous decision on the result, but no majority to push the federalism issue to be clean-cut.
    - Gorsuch (writing for The Court), Barrett, Thomas would go as far to say that this is effectively not a judicable matter.
    - Sotamayor wrote a concurrence joined by Kagan.
    - Chief Justice Roberts wrote a partial concurrence joined by Alito, Kavanaugh, Jackson.
    - Kavanaugh also wrote a dissent.

    This footnote has me giggling:
    Both dissents seek to characterize today’s decision as “fractured” in an effort to advance their own overbroad readings of Pike and layer their own gloss on opinions they do not join. Post, at 1, 8 (opinion of KAVANAUGH, J.); see also post at 2–4, 8–10 (opinion of ROBERTS , C. J.).
    But the dissents are just that—dissents. Their glosses do not speak for the Court. Today, the Court unanimously disavows petitioners’ “almost per se” rule against laws with extraterritorial effects.


    Edit:
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom