It would likely have been physically unsafe to resume play that night, as the mental state of players from both teams would have been such that additional injuries would have been more likely. One look at the faces of the players was enough to realize that the game shouldn't, and wouldn't, resume that night.
Football and auto racing aren't the same thing. Death during the event is a much more common occurrence in racing.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
UPDATE 6: Fed Operatives Move into Place at Cincinnati Hospital Where Damar Hamlin is a Patient - NO NFL PLAYER HAS DIED FROM ON-FIELD INJURY IN OVER 50 YEARS | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
On Monday night Buffalo Bills player Damar Hamlin collapsed on the field after a tackle. Buffalo Bills player Damar Hamlin lay motionless as doctors worked on him.
The difference between the two sports from my perspective in regard to a participant being carted off, doesn't amount to a hill of beans difference. A rare situation occured and they were right to postpone the finish. The next morning the individual was stabilized and there should have been a plan to finish the game. What are logistical obstacles of having two football teams, one of which is from there to stay overnight to possibly play a game the next day? The equipment and personnel were already there.
Can we not what? I think it's an interesting question of why there would be a need for Fed's to be posted at the hospital for security reasons. Local police should be able to secure a hospital.
GP, the source site, was clearly pushing the vaccine/adverse event angle.
Didn't open the link.
www.outkick.com
profootballtalk.nbcsports.com
Well. Looked more to me like it was shoulder pads to the sternum, but still.
I still think that the bears don't have a great reason to pick #1. Likely a QB would be a #1 pick. I think maybe Stroud, given his performance. That dude lit it up under such pressure, even though they lost the game. Bears probably aren't gonna pick a QB. So I kinda think they'll trade down and go after what they really need. So I don't think it really matters a lot whether they have 1st or 2nd pick. I doubt they'll give up on Fields. And I don't think they'll spend a #1 pick elsewhere. I think they're trading down.“The Texans and the Bears remain contenders to land the first overall pick in the 2023 draft. If the Texans lose to the Colts, they will finish 2-14-1 and they will pick first overall for the first time since they took Jadeveon Clowney first overall in 2014.”
“If the Texans win and the Bears lose, the Bears would be 3-14 and they’d get the first overall pick. The Bears have not picked that high since 1947.”
“Both teams winning would give the pick to the Texans and Houston would also get the pick with a win and a Bears tie. If the Texans tie and the Bears lose, the pick will go to the Texans since the Bears won the head-to-head matchup between the teams this season.”
Texans enter Week 18 with inside track on first overall pick
There's been plenty of attention paid to the playoff implications of Week 18's games, but two teams at the other end of the standings head into the final weekend with a lot riding on their results.
And the facts include it was a pretty routine collision between players.
Could you reference these overboard posts? Or in jamil’s binary world, is asking the question overboard?
I do not expect the Bears to keep either pick. I expect them to trade down and still get their guy while a QB needy team moves up to a QB…
