Bloomberg says our interpretation of the Constitution must change!

[yepthatsme]

I hope this isn't a dupe. I searched and couldn't find it.

Anyway, I guess the moral of the story is, if they can scare us enough, maybe we will relinquish our rights to big brother.

Bloomberg Says Interpretation of Constitution Will


“Look, we live in a very dangerous world. We know there are people who want to take away our freedoms. New Yorkers probably know that as much if not more than anybody else after the terrible tragedy of 9/11,” he said.

It's getting kind of hard determining who is the terrorist.

 

[printcraft]

......
“Look, we live in a very dangerous world. We know there are people who want to take away our freedoms - I'm one of them! New Yorkers probably know that as much if not more than anybody else after the terrible tragedy of 9/11,” Bloomberg said.

FIXED for reality.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Tagging for reading later

Lunch time is just too short...

 

[HoughMade]

Here's a nutty thought- maybe we could read the Constitution as written and is we need to change something, use the amendment process. It's so crazy, it might just work!

 

[Mark 1911]

“It really says something bad about us that we have to do it. But our obligation first and foremost is to keep our kids safe in the schools; first and foremost, to keep you safe if you go to a sporting event; first and foremost is to keep you safe if you walk down the streets or go into our parks,” he said.

The government can not keep us safe. For them to pretend that they can is a lie, and a convenient excuse for them to assume powers that the founders meant to limit. Safety is not a government service, it is the right and responsibility of the people.

“We cannot let the terrorists put us in a situation where we can’t do those things. And the ways to do that is to provide what we think is an appropriate level of protection.”
But apparently Bloomberg thinks it's OK if the government chooses to put us in such a situation?

 

[KG1]

"We must take away your freedoms to protect your freedoms" That's how I read it.

 

[BogWalker]

So what do terrorists chucking IEDs have to do with gun control?

 

[rambone]

If we hold onto the Bill of Rights, we're being politically correct and soft on terrorism.

 

[No2rdame]

If this rich idiot had his way and was able to rewrite the Constitution to suit his personal agenda then the terrorists have won.

 

[Trigger Time]

I know exactly who some of the terrorist are and they are paid with tax dollars.

 

[Project972]

ok, where is the story beck was going to come out with. saw something from nh but thats it.

 

[Trooper]

They already have the new constitution ready. The Constitution in 2020 the plan is to put in place by 2020.

 

[Sfrandolph]

This will probably get me banned but what the heck. I wish some New Yorker would hit Bloomberg in the head with a hammer.....HARD.

 

[johnny45]

Bloomberg Says Interpretation of Constitution Will

From the "Comments" section
"We're going to suspend your rights to protest, bear arms, privacy, and trial by jury."
"Why?"
"To protect you from terrorists."
"Why do we need to be protected from terrorists?"
"They hate you for your freedom."




Bloomberg, and those of his ilk, are the terrorists that concern me.

 

[Carmelbythecorn]

Bloomberg Says Interpretation of Constitution Will

From the "Comments" section
"We're going to suspend your rights to protest, bear arms, privacy, and trial by jury."
"Why?"
"To protect you from terrorists."
"Why do we need to be protected from terrorists?"
"They hate you for your freedom."

Bloomberg, and those of his ilk, are the terrorists that concern me.

^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^

 

[CarmelHP]

They already have the new constitution ready. The Constitution in 2020 the plan is to put in place by 2020.

The ACS is a bad news bunch of radical Left extremists. I saw this name on their conference list:

Dawn Johnsen, Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Professor Johnsen was at IU-B Law when I was a student. One crazy, evil woman.

 

[1911Shooter]

I am more afraid of the terrorist that sit on capital hill, than I am of the terrorist that strike our country. The FBI has a terrorist watch list. So my only question is, why watch them commit the crime. Why cant we get them out of here before they commit the crime. They obviously have a reason to watch them. Why not just give them the boot to begin with. If your suspicious enough to be drug in by the FBI for questioning, then you need to be sent out.

 

[Racechase1]

Ben Franklin was right, those who give up liberty for security deserve neither. Let's start with Bloomberg.

 

[9mmfan]

Bloomberg is a tool. New Yorkers deserve what they got. They just need to keep him confined to NY.

 

[Fullmag]

“It really says something bad about us that we have to do it. But our obligation first and foremost is to keep our kids safe in the schools; first and foremost, to keep you safe if you go to a sporting event; first and foremost is to keep you safe if you walk down the streets or go into our parks,” he said.

The government can not keep us safe. For them to pretend that they can is a lie, and a convenient excuse for them to assume powers that the founders meant to limit. Safety is not a government service, it is the right and responsibility of the people.

“We cannot let the terrorists put us in a situation where we can’t do those things. And the ways to do that is to provide what we think is an appropriate level of protection.”
But apparently Bloomberg thinks it's OK if the government chooses to put us in such a situation?

And we're supposed to believe this after the Judge threw out his Soda Pop law saying it was arbitrary and capricious!