Bianchi v. Brown (formerly Frosh) Petition for Certiorari to SCOTUS

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • JAL

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 14, 2017
    2,177
    113
    Indiana
    Searched and didn't see anything here about the Maryland Bianchi v. Frosh, now Bianchi v. Brown case regarding Maryland's Assault Weapons Ban that was granted Cert, vacated and remanded back to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in June 2022 with instructions to redo it in light of the Bruen decision. There it has stalled with the 4th Circuit doing everything it can to do nothing. The 4th Circuit Merits Panel for the case heard oral arguments, and no decision was issued for months, and then the 4th Circuit, with nobody petitioning for it, suddenly decided to rehear it en banc. Not hard to connect the dots. The 3 judge Merits Panel was going to decide 2-1 in favor of Bianchi. The dissenting judge went to the rest of the judges suggesting they take it over en banc to arrive at the "correct" decision (in favor of Maryland). And there it sits, with the 4th Circuit doing nothing to move the case along.

    FPC, 2AF and CCRKBA have jointly made, on behalf of Bianchi (et al) a very unusual Petition for Certiorari under SCOTUS Rule 11, for SCOTUS to take up the case before a Circuit Court has issued a decision.

    William Kirk of Washington Gun Law is the only GunTuber I've seen with anything about it. He cites 2AF and for some reason omits FPC and CCRKBA, perhaps because he first saw it on 2AF's web site or was messaged by them about it. All three are fully on board in the petition.




    Petition to SCOTUS for Certiorari can be read here . . . an interesting one expressing their frustration with 4th Circuit
    Bianchi v. Brown Petition for Certiorari

    The ramifications of this, if SCOTUS takes it up, reach into the rubbish Prelim Injunction decision the 7th Circuit vomited out with the Illinois "Assault Weapons" Ban, the one sitting in the 9th Circuit with California's, and the one percolating along in Washington State. One can hope SCOTUS will see what's going on in various states and Circuits and end the madness -- and put a stake through the heart of the POTUS and VPOTUS endless exhortations for Congress to enact an Assault Weapon Ban.

    Notes:
    CCRKBA: Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is a smaller organization in Bellevue, Washington State.
    FPC: Firearms Policy Coalition
    2AF: Second Amendment Foundation, sometimes abbreviated SAF.
     

    Attachments

    • Bianchi v Brown 2024.02.08_Cert_Petition.pdf
      425.8 KB · Views: 1
    Last edited:
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 7, 2022
    193
    43
    Kosciusko county
    Searched and didn't see anything here about the Maryland Bianchi v. Frosh, now Bianchi v. Brown case regarding Maryland's Assault Weapons Ban that was granted Cert, vacated and remanded back to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in June 2022 with instructions to redo it in light of the Bruen decision. There it has stalled with the 4th Circuit doing everything it can to do nothing. The 4th Circuit Merits Panel for the case heard oral arguments, and no decision was issued for months, and then the 4th Circuit, with nobody petitioning for it, suddenly decided to rehear it en banc. Not hard to connect the dots. The 3 judge Merits Panel was going to decide 2-1 in favor of Bianchi. The dissenting judge went to the rest of the judges suggesting they take it over en banc to arrive at the "correct" decision (in favor of Maryland). And there it sits, with the 4th Circuit doing nothing to move the case along.

    FPC, 2AF and CCRKBA have jointly made, on behalf of Bianchi (et al) a very unusual Petition for Certiorari under SCOTUS Rule 11, for SCOTUS to take up the case before a Circuit Court has issued a decision.

    William Kirk of Washington Gun Law is the only GunTuber I've seen with anything about it. He cites 2AF and for some reason omits FPC and CCRKBA, perhaps because he first saw it on 2AF's web site or was messaged by them about it. All three are fully on board in the petition.




    Petition to SCOTUS for Certiorari can be read here . . . an interesting one expressing their frustration with 4th Circuit
    Bianchi v. Brown Petition for Certiorari

    The ramifications of this, if SCOTUS takes it up, reach into the rubbish Prelim Injunction decision the 7th Circuit vomited out with the Illinois "Assault Weapons" Ban, the one sitting in the 9th Circuit with California's, and the one percolating along in Washington State. One can hope SCOTUS will see what's going on in various states and Circuits and end the madness -- and put a stake through the heart of the POTUS and VPOTUS endless exhortations for Congress to enact an Assault Weapon Ban.

    Notes:
    CCRKBA: Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is a smaller organization in Bellevue, Washington State.
    FPC: Firearms Policy Coalition
    2AF: Second Amendment Foundation, sometimes abbreviated SAF.

    Hopefully FPC will win and people on MdShooters have been talking about this for years!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: JAL

    JAL

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 14, 2017
    2,177
    113
    Indiana
    Directly related to this Petition for Cert. to SCOTUS, and hot on its heels, 2AF and FPC filed Petition for Cert. today (Feb. 12th) regarding the 7th Circuit Harrel v. Raoul challenging Illinois' semi-auto rifle and magazine bans.

    Posting about it in the Illinois' ban case the 7th Circuit botched is here:
    https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/illinois-high-capacity-mag-firearm-ban.530398/post-9842345

    My "Educated Guess" is they're hitting SCOTUS with multiple Cert. Petitions to spur them into doing something to put an end to the multiple Circuit Court shenanigans.

    Will we see another Cert. Petition regarding the ones languishing in the 9th Circuit?
    :popcorn:
     

    JAL

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 14, 2017
    2,177
    113
    Indiana
    Yet more directly related to this Petition for Cert. NAGR also filed a Petition for Cert. yesterday (Feb. 12th) regarding the 7th Circuit Bevis v. Naperville, initially challenging Naperville's semi-auto rifle and mag bans, and subsequently enlarging it to the Illinois' bans. I discovered it today when I came across an NAGR YouTube video about it.

    Posted about it in the Illinois ban cases heard and deep sixed by the 7th Circuit is here (NAGR video is there too):
    https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/illinois-high-capacity-mag-firearm-ban.530398/post-9842789

    Edited to add:
    Third Petition for Cert filed from Illinois and 7th Circuit for Barnett v. Roul by NSSF
    https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/illinois-high-capacity-mag-firearm-ban.530398/post-9842853

    I'm convinced now that this is a coordinated effort by the various organizations to compel SCOTUS to take action on the Circuit Courts giving SCOTUS the middle finger. This is the third one in two business days. As posted above, I'm making popcorn for the shoe to drop on the California case sitting in the 9th Circuit.
    :popcorn:
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom