How so? I was unaware they appear to have done a remake? Not sure but Star Trek was pre 70’s and StarWars came out in the 70’s ?He ruined both Star Wars and Star Trek... So there's that.
Although I did really enjoy Cloverfield
He ruined both Star Wars and Star Trek... So there's that.
Although I did really enjoy Cloverfield
FtfyHe fixed both Star Wars and Star Trek... So there's that.
Although Cloverfield was dumb
Dude what century do you live in? HahaHow so? I was unaware they appear to have done a remake? Not sure but Star Trek was pre 70’s and StarWars came out in the 70’s ?
The first JJ Trek was at least watchable the second one was terrible and I didn't bother with the third one.I really like the Star Trek reboot movies. The Star Wars ones are complete trash.
One for the longest time there was little to no time for recreational activity.Dude what century do you live in? Haha
The first JJ Trek was at least watchable the second one was terrible and I didn't bother with the third one.
Especially when they could literally have gone anywhere storywise but they just remade Star Trek II with the worst possible everything.
I can definitely get behind that about AbramsI think he is good with coming up with a good start to a story but he cannot for the life of him figure out how to end anything properly.
Dennis Villeneuve and Rian Johnson (minus his star wars movie) are significantly better Sci-Fi directors IMHO.
I can definitely get behind that about Abrams
New Trek trio is OK if you aren't a die hard. There's a whole other thread about new ST.
last 3 SW yes, exactly, started out OK but the driver showed up with a cornucopia of pharmaceuticals before they did the bulk of the writing.