All Your Baby Are Belong To Us.

[JetGirl]

[ame]www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3qtpdSQox0[/ame]

 

[SmokinSigs357]

werd...

 

[eldirector]

That was rather sickening. What's this from, anyway?

Lean Forward? And what.... fall off of the cliff? No thanks.

Besides, if everyone's children were everyone else's responsibility, then *I* could smack the dirty little mouth off of the neighbor's kid.

 

[JetGirl]

What's this from, anyway?

Picked it up off of Reason.com.

 

[KLB]

Scary

 

[SideArmed]

What the hell did I just watch?

Now I have to take responsibility for the delinquint that lives down the road??! F' that!!

 

[Constructionist]

Not sure which way I want to go with my smart*** comment: the Aldous Huxley Brave New World direction, or the Sonnenkinder route.

 

[Constructionist]

Now I have to take responsibility for the delinquint that lives down the road??! F' that!!

Well more than likely you're already paying for the little brat.

 

[Leo]

I'll bet that you paid for the education of the little NAZI that is speaking in the video.

 

[BE Mike]

Ah, collectivism. Collective Farms sounds like a good idea, too. Too bad someone hasn't come up with this idea before. Oh wait a minute, they have, it's called communism!

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Another antiquated societal construct being redefined. This has been in process for years. Give it 10-20 years and it quite possibly will be a given that, of course you are simply a co-parent.

 

[Colt556]

It takes a village....

 

[GunSlinger]

I'd love to know whom she takes responsibility for in her 'village'.

 

[LockStocksAndBarrel]

They are having problems with indoctrination only at schools. They need them full time to completely brainwash them.

They're really out in the open with it now and there are plenty of parents that will be happy to go along with it. They will abdicate their responsibilty to raise them as long as the checks keep coming in the mail.

 

[theblackhat]

This is the subversive promotion for the public adoption of Agenda 21 which follows the ideology of "a new vision of the child. Children are neither the property of their parents nor are they helpless objects of charity. They are human beings and are the subject of their own rights. The Convention offers a vision of the child as an individual and as a member of a family and community, with rights and responsibilities appropriate to his or her age and stage of development."
The UN has interpreted this to mean that the "rights" of a child over-ride the responsibilities of that child's parents and the child will be better suited to a community form of education and rearing.

At first blush, this doesn't sound so bad until you realize that in countries where this has become legal precedent, children can sue parents for doing chores or worse, parents can lose all "rights" to raising their own child if the government believes their method or ideologies in child rearing do not meet the UN standard of Agenda 21.
Your child may no longer be your own under this.

 

[RobbyMaQ]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3qtpdSQox0

Perfect! You don't know how HAPPY I am to hear you say this!!!!

When do you want us to drop them off?

 

[mdmayo]

Can either of our major parties really go any further to alienate us as voters?

This is SO far beyond "it takes a village" that I just vomited in my mouth, a little.

 

[Sfrandolph]

Welcome to Amerika.

 

[BGDave]

Wow. She even said that with a straight face................................................................................................................Wow, I was hanging on the backspace key. Edit to add; ever get righteously indignant and have to backspace all the mean out of it?

 

[So IN Dude]

I just don't get the "lean forward". Should we lube up first?