It may "prove" nothing. But I personally think that what she says now is likely more truthful than what she might have said with the coaching of the State's attorney while on the witness stand. Especially "facts" that aren't self serving or supportive of "the official" anti-GZ narrative that they are trying to put out there.Proves? After the mauling she and her testimony took here, I'm kinda surprised anyone is using anything she said as "proof" of anything. Do we really think the word of an admitted liar alone is proof of anything?
Joe