Democrats want to Legalize Marijuana

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,897
    113
    The displayed data is for three years after the year in which they legalized. To get three years or more, wouldn't you have to be dealing? The magic of legalization is not reducing incarceration, so no savings there

    If so many pointless arrests were due to otherwise innocents being persecuted for the Ganga, you think there would have been a decrease in incarcerations - which is what the bull**** claims that it will save money are based on

    Again, who's claiming it will save money?

    You won't see any decrease in prison populations because nobody is going to prison for marijuana anyway unless it's a semi load. Prisons =/= jails. Generally speaking, only sentences of over 1 year in duration are served in prisons. Anything less is served in county or regional jails, depending on the state. Today you wouldn't see much reduction in jails, either, for the reasons I've already stated. Possession of marijuana will not get you a jail stay, the jails are too full for that sort of crime to be punished by in custody sentences.

    And no, I'm still not doing your research for you. There's much better arguments against the legalization then you've presented, though. See the amount of illegal grows trying to evade taxes, maybe you can bolster your argument with that. Regardless, legalization will happen.

    Is it just me, or do the same folks that want to criticize the "war on drugs," want to quickly separate marijuana from all other drugs?

    In a thread on legalization of marijuana it would seem natural for the topic to focus on...marijuana. But you're not going to arrest your way out of any drug issue as long as the culture supports it.
     

    Route 45

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Dec 5, 2015
    15,076
    113
    Indy
    Has it occurred to anyone that democrats might prefer an electorate that is lazy, unmotivated, dependent and in a stupor for reasons other than their newfound 'support' of individual freedoms?
    If you don't like it, you could always move to Ohio.

    Oh, wait...

     

    Shadow01

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 8, 2011
    3,352
    119
    WCIn
    Instead of making it legal to buy in any corner stand, make people buy a license to purchase no different than our LTCH, fishing or hunting license? Add a nice little caveat that a valid pot license makes you ineligible for state social programs.
     

    Route 45

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Dec 5, 2015
    15,076
    113
    Indy
    Instead of making it legal to buy in any corner stand, make people buy a license to purchase no different than our LTCH, fishing or hunting license? Add a nice little caveat that a valid pot license makes you ineligible for state social programs.
    LTCH is not required to purchase a firearm.
    Fishing and hunting licenses are not required to buy fishing and hunting gear.

    Why not licenses to buy alcoholic beverages? Or violent video games? Or tannerite?

    How much more control would you like the government to have over other people's lives to suit your moral standards?
    I'm guessing that it's right up to the point where you are the one affected.
     

    edporch

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Oct 19, 2010
    4,680
    149
    Indianapolis
    I think we have better things to do than arrest people for using marijuana.
    At the very LEAST we should allow people to use it medically if their doctor believes it can help them.

    Though personally, in my life experience I've never had much trouble with somebody who smoked pot, but have had PLENTY of trouble from people who drink too much.

    On the medical issue, my first memory of this was about 40 years ago when a friend's younger sister was taking treatments for leukemia.

    She had such bad nausea she had trouble eating and keeping anything down.
    And any of the anti-nausea drugs she tried to take, she just threw back up before they could take effect.

    Her parents, hardly advocates of recreational drug use, discretely found ways to get her marijuana because it helped her to be able to eat and not throw up everything.
    She later passed, but this helped her stay nourished during the time she was fighting the leukemia.

    Another case was a man I crossed paths with sometime ago who'd had a severe back injury where they put titanium rods in his spine to repair it.

    The man got addicted to opiate pain killers because of the constant pain and had to go off of them, which took the help of Narcotics Anonymous to do because they messed him up so much.

    So he began using marijuana for this to avoid using harder prescription drugs.
    He certainly wasn't a pothead, but he found that marijuana helped him with the chronic pain enough so that he could stay off harder drugs and carry on a degree of a normal life.

    The idea that either of these people should've been arrested and charged for marijuana possession is absurd.
     

    Ziggidy

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    May 7, 2018
    7,327
    113
    Ziggidyville
    We should start and promote making all mind altering intoxication not cool.

    The anti-smoking campaigns have worked pretty well to make smoking no longer cool. Something along that line would do well to promote not altering people's mental status with any chemical.

    Bottom line, we shouldn't change any laws. Just change attitudes about how to live life.

    :twocents:
    The left is doing that as we speak.....
     

    Ziggidy

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    May 7, 2018
    7,327
    113
    Ziggidyville
    The question that has not been answered:

    How will YOU reply to the question on the 4473 if you engage in the illegal drug?

    States can do whatever but it still is a no-no with the federal law.

    It's easy to throw out all the canned "pro-weed" answers but how does one support the legalization of a mind altering drug responsibly?
     
    Last edited:

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,220
    77
    Porter County
    The question that has not been answered:

    How will YOU reply to the question on the 4473 if you engage in the illegal drug?
    You assume that those in favor of legalizing want it so they can legally consume it? I for one have never and have no desire to consume any drug in this context.

    It's easy to throw out all the canned "pro-weed" answers but how does one support the legalization of a mind altering drug responsibly?
    Easy, Freedom. The thing our country was founded on.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,837
    113
    North Central
    Is it just me, or do the same folks that want to criticize the "war on drugs," want to quickly separate marijuana from all other drugs?
    Yep, it is a coping mechanism. They lack the courage to say it all.

    The feds have no constitutional authority to make them illegal. It is for states to decide. (See 18th amendment.) We need to get over this nannying of everybody else.
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,890
    113
    Arcadia
    Is it just me, or do the same folks that want to criticize the "war on drugs," want to quickly separate marijuana from all other drugs?
    I don't consider cannabis to pose the threat to society that the others do. Cocaine can still be prescribed as it does have medicinal use. To classify cannabis as a Schedule I, meaning it has no medicinal value is beyond ridiculous considering the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

    The question that has not been answered:
    How will YOU reply to the question on the 4473 if you engage in the illegal drug?

    States can do whatever but it still is a no-no with the federal law.

    It's easy to throw out all the canned "pro-weed" answers but how does one support the legalization of a mind altering drug responsibly?
    It it becomes legalized I suspect that question will be dropped from the 4473.


    Cannabis is no more mind altering that alcohol and if someone is going to be armed while utilizing either I’d much prefer them to be on cannabis than alcohol.
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,890
    113
    Arcadia
    I find it interesting that so many who are fine with alcohol take such a strong stance against cannabis. No one ever wants to hear it but if you find yourself in that category it is quite clear that you speak from a position of ignorance on the issue and you only know what you’ve been told.

    I’ve yet to meet a LEO who would agree that cannabis poses a more significant, or even as much of a threat to the safety of the uninvolved than alcohol.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,837
    113
    North Central
    You assume that those in favor of legalizing want it so they can legally consume it? I for one have never and have no desire to consume any drug in this context.

    That suggestion is BS. Why would he make such a shallow assumption? Particularly on this issue with so many corollaries that affect so many. For me to reach the belief in legalization of everything it was a combination of awareness all coming together.

    We cannot keep drugs out of super max prisons, how can we keep them out of our country? We can’t.

    The fiscal cost of the war on drugs.

    The militarization of LEO to fight war on drugs.

    The loss of civil liberties in the name of the war on drugs.

    The understanding that some humans are flawed and NOTHING can change that.

    The knowledge that in search of a “high” the addicted will do ANYTHING from huffing your AC refrigerant to cooking dangerous chemicals.

    I have personally never taken any illegal drug but I am for complete legalization. Put the burden the families and organizations that want to help those with problems.
     

    Flash-hider

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 19, 2012
    687
    93
    So here is the likely path it will take, assuming you process is like that in Michigan. Unless the Dem's control all the Indiana capital, the question will appear as a ballot initiative. Once those petitions begin being circulated big outside money will pour in particularly for the Soros groups. Once there are enough signatures collected big money will outspend the opponents 10, 12, 15 to 1. When it passes and it will, be prepared for at least a democrat for a governor, if you're lucky you won't lose the House or Senate to them either. Also, be prepare to lose other State wide offices.
    We now have a governor, attorney general, and secretary of state that are referred to the 3 witches. Plus, there were other ballot initiatives like citizen redistricting that passed that are creating a nightmare.
    The republican controlled House, Senate, and governor, had a chance to legalize mj prior to the 2018 election but didn't act. Now we have 2 more years of whitmer and her sisters.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,135
    149
    Columbus, OH
    At the very LEAST we should allow people to use it medically if their doctor believes it can help them.
    While you're at it, can you also mandate they can use other drugs, like say Ivermectin, if their doctor believes it can help them?

    I suspect, though, that since you can already force a pharmacist to dispense an abortifacient that you would be able to force them to fill a prescription for MJ too, because that aligns with the left's narrative. That same pharmacist would likely continue to be able to refuse to fill a valid prescription for Ivermectin because of his belief in the church of vaccination
     
    Top Bottom