President Trump Indicted on Federal Charges

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • LeftyGunner

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 10, 2022
    589
    63
    Indianapolis
    Well Biden had top secret documents in his garage since his days as VP. Are you willing to agree he needs the same indictments now as President? Or are you going to find some trumped up excuse why the same treatment doesn’t apply?
    That isn’t a direct comparison.

    Biden was found to have one document he should not, and he returned it to the government immediately upon its discovery.

    Trump kept a truckload of government records without authorization, lied about it and refused to return the documents when they were discovered in his possession.

    Trump could have done the same thing as Biden and returned the government property he took, but, instead he chose a pissing match with the DOJ.

    This is Trump’s own doing, and was easily avoidable.
     

    XMil

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 20, 2009
    1,521
    63
    Columbus
    Well Biden had top secret documents in his garage since his days as VP. Are you willing to agree he needs the same indictments now as President? Or are you going to find some trumped up excuse why the same treatment doesn’t apply?
    Here's a direct quote from my post:

    "I can hear a lot of "BUT WHAT ABOUT.......?" If someone is breaking the law, they should face the charges. It doesn't matter who's "team" they are on."
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,968
    113
    North Central
    That isn’t a direct comparison.

    Biden was found to have one document he should not, and he returned it to the government immediately upon its discovery.

    Trump kept a truckload of government records without authorization, lied about it and refused to return the documents when they were discovered in his possession.

    Trump could have done the same thing as Biden and returned the government property he took, but, instead he chose a pissing match with the DOJ.

    This is Trump’s own doing, and was easily avoidable.
    Lies!

    Biden was not a President so he has no reason to possess any documents. As President Trump had the ultimate power over all documents, including what he wants to keep for personal archives.

    What a bunch of malarkey, the government has rigged the system to where the average American commits three felonies a day.

    Thinking like this enables the deep state…
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,172
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Ah yes, the hyper liberal DOJ. What do I hear all the time on here? "If you don't want to be arrested, don't break the law"
    I hear a lot of people give lip service to integrity, honesty, fairness, morality but it seems to go out the window when it's "your guy". As long as we are treating our representation like a sports team, and the only standard is that "We Win!!" We will continue to swim in the sewer.

    I can hear a lot of "BUT WHAT ABOUT.......?" If someone is breaking the law, they should face the charges. It doesn't matter who's "team" they are on.

    Please enjoy the following actual INGO quotes.

    "Rule #1 - Don't break the law
    Rule # 2 - See rule #1"

    "Distrusting the police is a criminal thing irregardless of race. Don't break the law don't see the police."

    "If someone doesn't like being sued and/or prison time, don't break the law. It seems too simple."

    "Maybe, don't break the law even if you're deaf and black."

    "I have an idea....... Don't break the law!"

    ". If you do not want to have interaction with law enforcement, stack the odds in your favor, don't break the law. It is really that simple. "

    "If you don't want to get shot don't break the law don't resist arrest."

    "Don't break the law and you won't get shot by the cops."

    "It's surprisingly easy to do too. Just don't break the law. They really don't keep them a secret"

    *names removed to protect the quilty.
    Yeah, you got it!

    55TheLaw.jpg
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,172
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Well this was awful nice of DeSantis to set aside running against Trump for a minute to defend Trump once again and call out the weaponization of federal law enforcement like he has done so many times before which those that don't like DeSantis have failed to recognize.

    DeSantis takes a 'stance', others take action

    Somebody needs to tell him playing not to lose =/= playing to win
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149

    DeSantis takes a 'stance', others take action

    Somebody needs to tell him playing not to lose =/= playing to win
    More of the same from you Bug refusing to acknowledge anything DeSantis has done to support and defend Trump like he has for so many years. I suppose you'll do the same with what I'm about to post.


    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who officially stepped into the presidential race this week, said Thursday that, if elected, he would consider pardoning people involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol — possibly including his rival for the GOP nomination, former President Donald Trump if need be.

    "We will use the pardon power — and I will do that at the front end," DeSantis said, claiming that the Justice Department and the FBI had been "weaponized" to unevenly punish people from "disfavored groups."

    When asked whether he would consider pardoning Trump if he were charged with federal offenses, DeSantis responded that "any example of disfavored treatment based on politics or weaponization would be included in that review, no matter how small or how big."
     
    Last edited:

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,172
    149
    Columbus, OH
    So he has 'promised to consider it'

    So, in effect, he has promised nothing at all. I think he just wants to slipstream Ramaswarmy now. Why is he so down on power?
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    So he has 'promised to consider it'

    So, in effect, he has promised nothing at all. I think he just wants to slipstream Ramaswarmy now. Why is he so down on power?
    Umm.... DeSantis made that comment in May before Ramsammy did here so how is that "slipstreaming"?
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Ahem.. Back in May...

    "DeSantis said that on "Day One" of his presidency he would have his staff examine cases and would be "aggressive" in issuing pardons."

    "When asked whether he would consider pardoning Trump if he were charged with federal offenses, DeSantis responded that "any example of disfavored treatment based on politics or weaponization would be included in that review, no matter how small or how big."

    Seems to me this would include Trump.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Considering < will do so
    WTF Bug. Tell me again how was DeSantis exactly "slipstreaming" Ramsawrmy like you claimed when he made those comments that I posted back in May? Pay attention before you make a fool of yourself again.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Ok so you can't/won't answer my repeated question on how could it be that DeSantis was "slipstreaming" Ramswarmy on his comment that he made now on 06/08/23 when DeSantis made those comments back in May?

    The article that I posted containing those comments was published on.

    May 26, 2023, 10:28 AM CDT
    By Rose Horowitch

    Now if he made those comments AFTER Ramaswamy made his then i would say he was just "slipstreaming" behind him awaiting an opportunity to pass Ramaswamy and make a comment.

    IMO "slipstreaming" in this case would be like waiting to see what someone else says before making a comment.

    DeSantis had no idea that Ramaswamy was going to make his comment now when he made those comments back in May. I don't believe Ramsarrmy made any comments about pardons prior to DeSantis until now. So was Ramsawrmy "slipstreaming" DeSantis by waiting so long?

    There's really no point in me asking anymore because you keep avoiding it with your foolishness. You've now even resorted to Muppet memes to avoid it.

    I'll waste no more time here.

    1686338775254.png
     
    Last edited:

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    16,052
    113
    Well Biden had top secret documents in his garage since his days as VP. Are you willing to agree he needs the same indictments now as President? Or are you going to find some trumped up excuse why the same treatment doesn’t apply?
    That depends on an IF and truthfulness of the reporting...
    IF the reporting is true that Trump refused to turn over documents and was hiding documents and Biden was NOT doing the SAME THEN I see them as different.
     
    Top Bottom