I think it is actually more difficult with the pressure….Why rush to the stars when we need to explore here yet.
I think it is actually more difficult with the pressure….Why rush to the stars when we need to explore here yet.
I've always wanted to see and learn more about our depths. We are still finding new creatures from them.I think it is actually more difficult with the pressure….
FIFY... If other civilizations have developed "time folding" or "time travel" technologies then who knows? Remember a lot of stuff that only existed in science fiction has now come to fruition.
There also were no facts that an iPhone would be more powerful than a 70’s mainframe…That is the problem. If, could be, maybe, might, and so on are not based in fact but are wishful thinking.
The facts don't support this approach. I don't believe in time travel either.
Since there is no evidence to support little green men, it is more likely Bigfoot is real than astronauts from outer space.
Somebody told me yesterday that they (whoever "they" are) are trying to figure out a way to save your consciousness into a "cloud".There also were no facts that an iPhone would be more powerful than a 70’s mainframe…
We're just getting over one of the biggest scams in history and I'm to believe science can tell me there are TRILLIONS of galaxies and the crystals on Mars means they once had life on it?Thanks for the link!
Still seems a far stretch to call this any more than an indication. Our knowledge of the universe out there barely scratches the surface, and going from "these crystals wouldn't hold together like this if left on their own" to "there must have been life forms that made them" still seems like quite a bit of a stretch. That may be the most logical explanation, but I have a hard time believing it's the only one, and certainly a far cry from being compelling evidence. It would also be interesting to know if they ever found any of these crystals on Mars itself, or just on a meteorite they're pretty sure came form Mars. Also, the article seems a bit unclear on whether or not there's examples of the same crystal chains in life on earth. It seems to say there are, but then later says that the scientists only studied individual crystals, and not crystal chains, so I'm not sure what that means exactly.
It's a bit over my head though, so, I'm really just going off of gut feeling here...
Read some sci-fi where space travel was done that way. Too many G's for flesh.Somebody told me yesterday that they (whoever "they" are) are trying to figure out a way to save your consciousness into a "cloud".
I truly cannot get my arms around that thought.
Well, I see your point and I think I agree with your conclusions, but it's also important to remember that we shouldn't fall into either the trap of believing that all "scientific" claims should be accepted without question, nor that they should all be rejected off-hand. The entire point of the scientific process is that claims are not made based on a person's authority, but rather on evidence that can be examined, questioned, and refuted by anyone based on logical thinking (true, in some cases not everyone has the education level to understand or properly discuss the relevant evidence, but nonsense is still nonsense, and I don't have to fully understand the odds of magnetic crystals forming into lines to see that it's quite a stretch to say that a certain pattern of crystal "proves" there was life on Mars, just like I don't have to be an expert virologist to know that a virus won't be stopped by a paper-thin sheet of cloth.)We're just getting over one of the biggest scams in history and I'm to believe science can tell me there are TRILLIONS of galaxies and the crystals on Mars means they once had life on it?
Comon' next you'll have believing that hair spray is responsible for global warming and that if we do not act now, the world will die.......30 years ago? Wait, let me call Al Gore to explain all of this to us; after we talk to Fauci about bats!
I feel science has proven the existance of God; not that He needed scientific proof. I feel people decline that conclusion for reasons specific to them and their lifestyle / character.Well, I see your point and I think I agree with your conclusions, but it's also important to remember that we shouldn't fall into either the trap of believing that all "scientific" claims should be accepted without question, nor that they should all be rejected off-hand. The entire point of the scientific process is that claims are not made based on a person's authority, but rather on evidence that can be examined, questioned, and refuted by anyone based on logical thinking (true, in some cases not everyone has the education level to understand or properly discuss the relevant evidence, but nonsense is still nonsense, and I don't have to fully understand the odds of magnetic crystals forming into lines to see that it's quite a stretch to say that a certain pattern of crystal "proves" there was life on Mars, just like I don't have to be an expert virologist to know that a virus won't be stopped by a paper-thin sheet of cloth.)
A lot of people say things like "I don't believe in religion, I believe in science" (or vice versa, though I don't hear that one stated explicitly very often.) Either statement seems like patent nonsense to me. Science is a process, and nowadays what is commonly referred to as "science" encompasses a vast array of different fields, occupied by wildly different sorts of people, many of whom have nothing to do with actual science except for the string of letters after their name.
I have very firm religious beliefs, and I have beliefs based in science as well (and I have religious beliefs that are influenced by scientific findings, and vice versa) but in either case, I believe things that are logical are reasonable based on the available evidence, and where direct evidence is not available or is beyond my understanding, I believe statements from individuals based on how trustworthy they seem to be. But I never believe a certain thing just because "science says" or "religion says" it's so. I also try to never reject anyone for questioning any of my beliefs, and am glad to provide my reasons for believing them, and discuss them openly.
Okay, sorry for the random and slightly off-topic rant, I'll put my soap box away now...
Or they are so far away that they have no clue we even exist. Even if something else exists in our Galaxy, the chance of them learning about us is miniscule. Take it to another Galaxy, and the chance is basically zero.Why hasn't intelligent life from outer space not made contact or taken over? Probably because they are no farther along than we are.
I heard the USS Enterprise was circling Uranus looking for Klingons.
I agree with this. If one believes the Bible (which I do), the absence of information about any given subject is simply the absence of any information. It is not evidence that the subjects not discussed don't exist.Who knows if God created life in other solar systems, or other galaxies.
The Bible is about us on earth nothing else....
"To serve man"I also think they'll be making an appearance soon and that the Covid vaccine(s) were actually meat tenderizers. Some of ya'll will be the first to go...
View attachment 193362