You didn't hear about this?Link?
You didn't hear about this?Link?
Right.You didn't hear about this?
I may have heard about it, but I didn't remember it.You didn't hear about this?
Oh now I remember it. Agreed with what I heard in that clip because, tome, what she was saying was we are losing civil liberties because someone else does something wrong. So I saw it as an anti Patriot Act statement and I felt like people wanting to be outraged just focused on the first clause because most people would agree with the second but because of who said it, they aren't going to admit it.I may have heard about it, but I didn't remember it.
Oh now I remember it. Agreed with what I heard in that clip because, tome, what she was saying was we are losing civil liberties because someone else does something wrong. So I saw it as an anti Patriot Act statement and I felt like people wanting to be outraged just focused on the first clause because most people would agree with the second but because of who said it, they aren't going to admit it.
Now I have only seen that clip, not the whole speech so maybe that is why people focused on the first clause and not just because of who said it.
Don't misinterpret my interpretation of that clip with approval of the speaker.It's not just that one thing, consider the source.
The brother ****ing America hater has a history of like examples.
Selective memory?I may have heard about it, but I didn't remember it.
Keep readingSelective memory?
I understood it as, at best, an attempt to say not all muslims were implicated in the crime (unlike all white people vis a vis systemic racism, according to her) but was also an offhand drastic minimization of the magnitude of the crime - much like saying about the Holocaust that 'some Germans did something'Oh now I remember it. Agreed with what I heard in that clip because, tome, what she was saying was we are losing civil liberties because someone else does something wrong. So I saw it as an anti Patriot Act statement and I felt like people wanting to be outraged just focused on the first clause because most people would agree with the second but because of who said it, they aren't going to admit it.
Now I have only seen that clip, not the whole speech so maybe that is why people focused on the first clause and not just because of who said it.
FIFYI understood it as, at best, an attempt to say not all muslims were implicated in the crime (unlike all white people vis a vis systemic racism, according to her) but was also an offhand drastic minimization of the magnitude of the crime - much like saying about the Holocaust that 'some Germans did something'
Personally, the conclusion I draw is that she doesn't see the attack as much of a problem, possibly something we deserved - unlike mostpatriotic Americansdecent human beings
I seriously doubt any employer ever expected to lose their National Guard employees to such a taskMassachusetts Calls On The National Guard To Mitigate A School Bus Driver Shortage
The pandemic has contributed to a shortage in bus drivers, so Gov. Charlie Baker says 250 Guard members with commercial driver's licenses will be brought in to help.www.npr.org