The more I think about this, the more I think you owe an explanation for why.This thread is probably the best argument, I've seen, for CRT being taught in schools.
The more I think about this, the more I think you owe an explanation for why.This thread is probably the best argument, I've seen, for CRT being taught in schools.
I think since you're the one who made the claim that this thread is an argument for why CRT should be taught, it's on you to make the case that it should. I'm waiting.Make your case. Tell me specifically what makes it garbage and brainwashing.
Some things that are true and worth saying in the vein of this thread: Slavery isn't uniquely race based. It hystocrically hasn't been. Formerly nations that defeated other nations mad slaves of the conquered people. The African slave trade came about because slavers, including Africans, subdued other Africans and sold them as slaves. It became a racial component in slavery because Africans became the most traded slave product. And Euoropeans, because African slaves looked so different from themselves, could forgive their consciences because they could convince themselves that Africans were less human.
The West's participation in slavery is not an indictment of Western values though. The West abolished slavery before most of the world did.
But, some things that should be amended in the OP: We were not the first Western contry to completely do away with slavery. Denmark-Norway was (1803). Great Britain did it in 1807. We weren't even the first in the Western Hemisphere. Haiti did it in 1804 shortly after its independance. Many other countries abolished slavery before the US did, and only with a stroke of pen. It took six more decades and a civil war to wrest the institution of slavery from the people who wanted to keep it here. That said, I'm not gonna give GB a total pass because they abolished it so long before the US. They depended on import of goods made from slave hands. They didn't act like they were all that eager for us to join them.
Also, to the idea that there were Black slave owners in the US, yes ,there were. But it was primarily Blacks who had been freed that owned slaves. They bought their own friends and relatives. Not to be slaves, but so that they could be reunited and so they wouldn't be slaves to other men.
But the point that we need to put the issue of slavery behind us is true. No one wants the return of slavery, except, perhaps some of the same people who are pushing CRT seem to want to flip the hierarchy. Not even white nationalists want to bring back slavery. They just think nations should be segregated, which, odly, some of the CRT pushers seem to agree. There still is racism, but nothing like what we had 100 years ago. Much progress has been made but the people pushing CRT don't seem to want to end racism. It's why we call them race baiters, because they their demand for real ass racism excedes the supply. So then they make **** up.
Why is that astonishing? If we're going to have these conversations in good faith, why would we not want to challenge beliefs that we know are perhaps misinformed? People read stuff and believe stuff, and not all the stuff people believe is true. So when we know something isn't true, like historical facts, it's worth saying what's true. And like I said, the things that weren't factually correct don't take away from the overall message that we need to make less of race, not more. DNA is unimportant. Immutable characteristics is at best an arbitrary way to think about the value of people. I've always believed that. And I think my body of posts on INGO supports that.
Solid
...and the US was one of the LAST western nations to abolish slavery, not first - as mentioned in the OP.
And CRT is probably the single best/biggest argument for reintroducing critical thinking, logic and debate back into schools... there are many, many others.This thread is probably the best argument, I've seen, for CRT being taught in schools.
Many other countries abolished slavery before the US did, and only with a stroke of pen. It took six more decades and a civil war to wrest the institution of slavery from the people who wanted to keep it here. That said,
That said, literal slavery (ownership and sale of a person) is indeed a modern and all-to-common issue, even in the Developed world. Some 24.9 million people are victims of slavery today. Here in the USA we see approx. 200,000 "human trafficking" cases per per year. The majority of victims are women, and sold for sex.
The more I think about this, the more I think you owe an explanation for why.
The more I think about this, the more I think you owe an explanation for why.
The idea that the original sin of the United States had long-lasting repercussions that endure to this day, and which can explain a number social, political, economic, and legal issues. The problem that I see with most people, is that they time that they think what's being said is that it's as bad "now," as it was "then," that plainly false. We're nowhere close. Another problem is that some people think they're being called racists simply because of the CRT notion. That's not true either.I think since you're the one who made the claim that this thread is an argument for why CRT should be taught, it's on you to make the case that it should. I'm waiting.
This is true. But this is also true... "While the North did not fight to end slavery, the South fought to preserve it."The war between the States was not to end slavery. It was to enforce the union.
Deified Lincoln himself said as much.
Just an important point to be noted.... not going to hijack the thread.
You're calling it racist indoctrination; can you please tell me exactly how CRT is that? In what way does the concept cultivate racism against, assumedly, White people living today.The Left is intent on pushing it's racist indoctrination on the rest of us so that we're so concerned about our differences that we focus on that instead of them continuing to amass power and push their senseless agenda.
Slavery rarely includes voluntary contracts.As of 2018, the countries with the most slaves were: India (8 million), China (3.86 million), Pakistan (3.19 million), North Korea (2.64 million), Nigeria (1.39 million), Indonesia (1.22 million), Democratic Republic of the Congo (1 million), Russia (794,000) and the Philippines (784,000).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_21st_century
Slavery in the 21st century - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_21st_century
The United States of America eliminated slavery April 9, 1865.
Sadly, most Americans are willing to reenter slavery by their own volition with credit contracts. Remarkably, they do not recognize their error, and then choose to claim victim hood. esp. those who had a great social time in college.
CRT is not on solid intellectual or academic ground as it is based upon flawed historical analysis, to say the least.I have not understood that to be true. The theory is on solid ground, as I understand it, and not something I would call racist. Perhaps we have different understandings of what it is. And I misspoke. I don't think CRT should be taught in primary or secondary schools.
We can address that in a civil war thread. I don't want to derail this thread.The war between the States was not to end slavery. It was to enforce the union.
Deified Lincoln himself said as much.
Just an important point to be noted.... not going to hijack the thread.