Will We Ever Know The Truth About The Election? Still Hiding Everything...

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    ...well, it would be nice if the other side could find some actual voters from the other side doing the same thing. Ya know, to strengthen their point. So far everyone the “INGO Democrat Voter Fraud Bureau” has put up has been debunked.
    We can revisit this after some real evidence sees the light of day.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    We can revisit this after some real evidence sees the light of day.
    Where is this evidence going to come from? Arizona? Did you know that their audit does not have members from the major political parties observing each table? That would appear to be a pretty significant issue if the original results are deemed to be incorrectly tabulated.
     

    buckwacker

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 23, 2012
    3,085
    97
    Where is this evidence going to come from? Arizona? Did you know that their audit does not have members from the major political parties observing each table? That would appear to be a pretty significant issue if the original results are deemed to be incorrectly tabulated.
    Well that's kinda how the election was conducted. I mean if you weren't upset the election was conducted that way, it's a bit hypocritical to be whining now.
     

    1DOWN4UP

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 25, 2015
    6,418
    113
    North of 30
    They knew the hypocrisy was on backorder,thats why they have maybe 16 cameras recording everything for future reference. They didn't want the democrat or Rino help because they kept running the mail in votes thru multiple times. bidenvotes.jpg
     

    Hatin Since 87

    Bacon Hater
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 31, 2018
    11,636
    77
    Mooresville
    Did you know that their audit does not have members from the major political parties observing each table? That would appear to be a pretty significant issue
    Weird. Seems you didn’t mind when the poll watchers from 1 party wasn’t allowed to observe, and it was in no way evidence of shadiness... but when a result is challenged your standards seem to change.

    And you wonder why you’re accused of trolling and being a hypocrite. This. This is why.
     

    1DOWN4UP

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 25, 2015
    6,418
    113
    North of 30
    Hell,I'm still waiting to get paid for fixing that water pipe break in Atlanta,and delivering late night votes to Detroit back on Election Night!
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,214
    113
    North Central
    ...well, it would be nice if the other side could find some actual voters from the other side doing the same thing. Ya know, to strengthen their point. So far everyone the “INGO Democrat Voter Fraud Bureau” has put up has been debunked.
    Just another lie propagated by the perpetrators on the gullible and true believers...
     

    buckwacker

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 23, 2012
    3,085
    97
    Can you please provide more background to this allegation?
    I kinda think you know what I'm talking about, but in the off chance you're not being disingenuous, hatin states it more explicitly.
    Weird. Seems you didn’t mind when the poll watchers from 1 party wasn’t allowed to observe, and it was in no way evidence of shadiness... but when a result is challenged your standards seem to change.

    And you wonder why you’re accused of trolling and being a hypocrite. This. This is why.
     

    1DOWN4UP

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 25, 2015
    6,418
    113
    North of 30
    Slate is front-running the 'what if they find fraud' story, so I'm guessing everybody knows how this turns out and they're trying to get out in front of that story

    I have been trying to stay up on this.I really tried to read the article but it got torturous. Seems more of these Magic UNFOLDED Mail In Ballots keep appearing in the mix.They must be like those 8x11 unfolded utility bills that come out of those 4x12 envelopes I get every month.
     

    rooster

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Mar 4, 2010
    3,306
    113
    Indianapolis
    Slate is front-running the 'what if they find fraud' story, so I'm guessing everybody knows how this turns out and they're trying to get out in front of that story

    Clearly no bias in this reporting :rolleyes:
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    I kinda think you know what I'm talking about, but in the off chance you're not being disingenuous, hatin states it more explicitly.
    I'll ask again. Can you still please provide background to that allegation. I know perfectly well "what," you believe. I'm asking you to provide me with something that supports your allegation.
     

    buckwacker

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 23, 2012
    3,085
    97
    I'll ask again. Can you still please provide background to that allegation. I know perfectly well "what," you believe. I'm asking you to provide me with something that supports your allegation.
    Well, I'm not searching through your entire post history for something you didn't say. If you can find a prior post that indicates you were unhappy with observers being excluded from observing during the election, I'll stand corrected. It should be a post where you complained about it unprompted like you've done here with regard to the audit, not where you were forced to admit it wasn't appropriate because someone else put you on the spot.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Well, I'm not searching through your entire post history for something you didn't say. If you can find a prior post that indicates you were unhappy with observers being excluded from observing during the election, I'll stand corrected. It should be a post where you complained about it unprompted like you've done here with regard to the audit, not where you were forced to admit it wasn't appropriate because someone else put you on the spot.
    I didn’t realize that’s what you meant. So my bad on that. You need not search my posts. I never even addressed it. If Republican observers were excluded during the first initial count, then that’s an issue. I have seen other places where that is alleged, but not that it’s been proven. That what I thought you were talking about.
    And that “someone else,” is always doing that, even though they said they put me on ignore.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    CyberNinjas. A company that’s never done an election audit, never made a bid for the contract, and whose one noteworthy characteristic is that the owner believes that Trump, not Biden Arizona.
    This is a lot like college accreditation, particularly for faith based schools. In order to be accepted by the "enlightened" they have to espouse ideas contradictory with their beliefs. In this case, your implication seems to be that to be taken seriously they must be on a mission to confirm the Dominion results.
     

    buckwacker

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 23, 2012
    3,085
    97
    I didn’t realize that’s what you meant. So my bad on that. You need not search my posts. I never even addressed it. If Republican observers were excluded during the first initial count, then that’s an issue. I have seen other places where that is alleged, but not that it’s been proven. That what I thought you were talking about.
    And that “someone else,” is always doing that, even though they said they put me on ignore.
    There were instances of Republican observers being excluded documented during hearings in states legislatures, under sworn testimony and affidavits. It was discussed here extensively, with links to video of testimony. That's what I was getting at. I don't recall you having complained about that at all, but you have complained about what you perceive as bias in an election audit of a blue county in AZ. When I see this concerted effort to malign an effort to establish the authenticity of the vote in certain areas, it makes me think people of a certain political bent are worried what we will find when we start flipping over these rocks.
     
    Top Bottom