Who shot Ashli Babbitt ?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ECS686

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Dec 9, 2017
    1,736
    113
    Brazil
    I was thinking the same, I did a search to see if the name was ever released and I don't think it was. Not sure why this guy gets protected.
    Just the messenger. I spent 20 years working in a DOJ agency and was a Firearms Instructor Most (A lot anyway) of Federal LE agencies have policies where they do not release names of Officers involved in shootings
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    16,053
    113
    You are probably right. Is that the argument being made? Because it seems the “Poor Ashlii” crowd, are those folks that think she was unjustly shot, after jumping through the window of a police barricaded door, in an attempt to get into a area where congressional officials had sought safety, during an incident where scores of officers were injured.
    It's a fallback argument
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    16,053
    113
    I would say not at all. Any empathy I may have had for their "cause" evaporated when they started their ******** back when. They are nothing but scum. They can go to straight Hell for all I care.
    Not your sympathy they are after. Getting plenty of financial support elsewhere...someone pointed out Footlocker
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,103
    113
    Martinsville
    That, I agree with. Nothing wrong with believing that, because, well it's true. The idea bring in immigrants replaces native born Americans? No. There's an underlying message there.

    But if white people do the same, it's gentrification, and that's racism.

    Naw, sorry, completely ridiculous belief system. When we need low skill entry level employment widely available, the last thing we need is low skill entry level workers being imported.
    And yes, they do displace the native population. I feel like a minority in greenwood these days, it's ridiculous.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    That, I agree with. Nothing wrong with believing that, because, well it's true. The idea bring in immigrants replaces native born Americans? No. There's an underlying message there.
    In my observation it is a matter of importing immigrants who have little or no concept of freedom as we know it who do not push back against losing what they never had. Most any leftist would be screeching racism, but it works just as well with lilly white folks from the former combloc countries as it does with anyone else.
     

    oze

    Mow Ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Feb 26, 2018
    3,024
    113
    Fort Wayne
    Hard not to agree with this IMO

    " the Democratic Party was “trying to replace the current electorate, the voters now casting ballots, with new people, more obedient voters, from the third world.”
    There is a documentary on Prime called, " Uncle Tom", in which this very idea is discussed. I can't recommend it highly enough. The last thing the donkeys want is for the pets in their voting block to think for themselves. As an aside, after watching this, I'd vote for a Larry Elder/Candace Owens presidential ticket in a heartbeat.

    Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
     

    drillsgt

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    108   0   0
    Nov 29, 2009
    9,647
    149
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Just the messenger. I spent 20 years working in a DOJ agency and was a Firearms Instructor Most (A lot anyway) of Federal LE agencies have policies where they do not release names of Officers involved in shootings
    I posted that highlighting the hypocrisy, if it was BLM and it was an unarmed black woman good luck hiding the identity from the woke mob, they wouldn't rest until they knew it.
     

    ECS686

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Dec 9, 2017
    1,736
    113
    Brazil
    I posted that highlighting the hypocrisy, if it was BLM and it was an unarmed black woman good luck hiding the identity from the woke mob, they wouldn't rest until they knew it.
    I wouldn't disagree in part as an Observation most of the LE shootings involving (promoting) BLM activities is Municiple agencies. And they all seem to ID the Officers.

    However on the Federal level with those agencies that have that policy, with your example it wouldn't happen. At least if they found it justified. Unless it was 3rd party that had clear cell phone video etc.

    The only time you usully hear of hose is is they are charged and that usually haopens if something goes south off duty (like the recent Pentagon Police Officer facing 2 murder charges)
     

    drillsgt

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    108   0   0
    Nov 29, 2009
    9,647
    149
    Sioux Falls, SD
    I wouldn't disagree in part as an Observation most of the LE shootings involving (promoting) BLM activities is Municiple agencies. And they all seem to ID the Officers.

    However on the Federal level with those agencies that have that policy, with your example it wouldn't happen. At least if they found it justified. Unless it was 3rd party that had clear cell phone video etc.

    The only time you usully hear of hose is is they are charged and that usually haopens if something goes south off duty (like the recent Pentagon Police Officer facing 2 murder charges)
    It wouldn't happen maybe officially lol.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    The irony in this sentence is on another level.
    OK, he used a less than perfect word choice. Others, including the politically correct do it every day. Those present the day European explorers arrived are called natives. First, that presupposes that all "native Americans" are a monolithic block made up of interchangeable persons and tribes. Second, it signally fails to account for the number of times that land changed hands since the seventh day of creation. Third, it speaks volumes of the lack of a reasonable grasp on history to suppose that any combination of land and people existed in stasis from creation until discovered by Europeans.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    W
    OK, he used a less than perfect word choice. Others, including the politically correct do it every day. Those present the day European explorers arrived are called natives. First, that presupposes that all "native Americans" are a monolithic block made up of interchangeable persons and tribes. Second, it signally fails to account for the number of times that land changed hands since the seventh day of creation. Third, it speaks volumes of the lack of a reasonable grasp on history to suppose that any combination of land and people existed in stasis from creation until discovered by Europeans.
    Well, his words harken back to the “Nativist” movement from mid-19th to early 20th Century. Think “Gangs of NY.”
     
    Top Bottom