Who shot Ashli Babbitt ?

[BigRed]

It has provided merchandise at a 100% discount.

That's reparations according to this *****.

 

[kickbacked]

The point is, do you think that if Ashli Babbit were black, that the officer that killed her would be more, or less likely to have been charged?

I gave you a clear example of Capitol police shooting a black person resulting in death and not getting charged. Why ignore this?

 

[NKBJ]

Sometimes this bull just makes me think that genetics rule and that as individuals we're hopelessly over shadowed by the collective urge.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

No. I don’t think so. BUT if she was Black, the White officer would be equally justified in smoking her too.
Is your argument that she (or anyone) shouldn’t have been shot, or that if she was Black the Officer wouldve charged?

I just think that given today's politically and racially-charged environment (I think the two are one and the same), that yes, more than likely, the white officer would have been charged if she was black. And I also don't think she deserved to be "smoked", regardless of her race.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I just think that given today's politically and racially-charged environment (I think the two are one and the same), that yes, more than likely, the white officer would have been charged if she was black. And I also don't think she deserved to be "smoked", regardless of her race.

I didn’t say she “deserved” it, I said the shooting was justified.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

I gave you a clear example of Capitol police shooting a black person resulting in death and not getting charged. Why ignore this?

I'm sorry. I'm not meaning to ignore that, but it was a TL/DR situation for me. But your article was also from 2013. Not really the same climate as today.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

I didn’t say she “deserved” it, I said the shooting was justified.

Went back and re-read. Mea culpa. And agreed.

 

[BigRed]

The point is, do you think that if Ashli Babbit were black, that the officer that killed her would be more, or less likely to have been charged?

I suspect we would at least be told the name of the officer in that scenario.

 

[kickbacked]

I'm sorry. I'm not meaning to ignore that, but it was a TL/DR situation for me. But your article was also from 2013. Not really the same climate as today.

It happened months after the Zimmerman trial ended. I agree its not the exact same climate. But Its not so far off.

Trayvon Martin case: Los Angeles protest turns violent

Los Angeles appeals for calm after disturbances over the not-guilty verdict in the killing of a black teenager, a case that has rattled the US.

www.bbc.com

 

[drillsgt]

I suspect they we would at least be told the name of the officer in that scenario.

I was thinking the same, I did a search to see if the name was ever released and I don't think it was. Not sure why this guy gets protected.

 

[tbhausen]

Tucker Carlson sure wasn’t silent about this tonight.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Tucker Carlson sure wasn’t silent about this tonight.

Tucker Carlson showed his true colors a few nights back when he cited "replacement theory."

 

[tbhausen]

Tucker Carlson showed his true colors a few nights back when he cited "replacement theory."

How would you characterize my “true colors” if I agreed, at least in part, with him?

 

[Kutnupe14]

How would you characterize my “true colors” if I agreed, at least in part, with him?

I'd give you the benefit of the doubt and hope you didn't quite agree with what he said, as I understood it. What did you agree with?

Edit: Here's the video...

 

[tbhausen]

I'd give you the benefit of the doubt and hope you didn't quite agree with what he said, as I understood it. What did you agree with?

I believe it’s an entirely plausible theory that Democrats want to increase their power by manipulating the demographics of the electorate.

 

[JCSR]

Hard not to agree with this IMO

" the Democratic Party was “trying to replace the current electorate, the voters now casting ballots, with new people, more obedient voters, from the third world.”

 

[Kutnupe14]

I believe it’s an entirely plausible theory that Democrats want to increase their power by manipulating the demographics of the electorate.

That, I agree with. Nothing wrong with believing that, because, well it's true. The idea bring in immigrants replaces native born Americans? No. There's an underlying message there.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Hard not to agree with this IMO

" the Democratic Party was “trying to replace the current electorate, the voters now casting ballots, with new people, more obedient voters, from the third world.”

Oh trust me, I'm clear.

 

[tbhausen]

That, I agree with. Nothing wrong with believing that, because, well it's true. The idea bring in immigrants replaces native born Americans? No. There's an underlying message there.

Even though I think you’re full of **** most of the time and I will nearly always vociferously oppose you, I do respect you as a debater in the arena of ideas.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Even though I think you’re full of **** most of the time and I will nearly always vociferously oppose you, I do respect you as a debater in the arena of ideas.

Well thank you. Kinda, lol. You, at least, are able to keep your **** together and talk like you have a brain in your head, so I appreciate that as well.