Were there more officers than protesters? It didn't look that way. And obviously there seems to be a heck of a lot more protesters, on deck.
d
While there were other officers around there were a lot more people on the other side of the door to overwhelm all of them.
It appeared to be some sort of "last line of defense." If they let her (or anyone through) without using extreme force then others could and would follow. There comes a point where you back up and say, "NO MORE." Having a lawful duty to protect the people and property behind you it eventually becomes reasonable to use all force necessary to put down the mob.
Regards,
Doug
If they were defending the scum (pardon me, politicians) from death or serious bodily harm, maybe shooting would be justified, but I don't think what went down shows what happened as justified. How many police were seriously injured by the protestors? I agree there's a line, I'm just not sure a lethal shooting was the appropriate response. Where were the rubber bullets, tear gas and other non-lethal methods used during cities being freaking burnt down all summer?