just quoting this so it's on the new page as well and more people will see it.OK 1 more time people and then we start the process. Let this go. Period.
Either make an argument or shut up.
Yes, this is it.
Yes. I seem to recall some on INGO making the distinction that all of the good protestors went home before dark and only the troublemakers were left when darkness brought destructionIt's not that one justifies the other. But the violence and destruction in Portland, Seattle, and DC by Antifa was a lot worse and they were reported as "Protesters". The other side is that the events that happened 1/6 in DC were very quickly called domestic terrorists by the media. Why the difference? Why is the perspective so different based on the "side" the demonstrations were for?
I would say both sides were very peaceful, but once the destruction or whatever happens they're all rioters at the least. If it goes far enough, maybe domestic terrorists? But I feel like that term refers to the Timothy McVeigh's out there.
The best evidence they were infiltrators is the lack of confrontations reported between Trump supporters and antifa types...They weren't actually. They were Antifa infiltrators, just like all of the other riots. You'd have to be a hypocrite to not be willing to accept that fact.
Oh wait....
How come the officer didnt shoot her in the leg or arm just to stop her not kill her. Asking for the media?Holy cow, so someone on the other side of the door shot her when they already had a police presence with the protesters?
A question regarding the tactical situation.GRAPHIC FOOTAGE: Police fatally shoot a Trump supporter inside the Capitol building.
Does anyone here believe that what happened in Minneapolis in any way justified looting and burning and murder in cities X,Y,Z,A,B,C,D,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,T,W,X1,Y1 ...Do anyone here believe that what happened in City X in any way justifies what happened in DC?
People that cannot see that antifa is the violence wing of the democratic party and by extension the Chinese communist party have their head in the sand...Is it in the realm of possibilty that what happened in Portland, Seattle, City X AND what happened in DC could both be wrong?
Even if there is a difference in scale or level of violence, is it in the realm of possibility for any of those making the comparison you are making?
Do anyone here believe that what happened in City X in any way justifies what happened in DC?
Wing of what group?The DC protestors will be held to much higher standards, they committed a cardinal sin - they threatened the illusion that the constitution can protect your rights when it is only paid lip service without action to uphold it
View attachment 120008
They will have the book thrown at them, and the just 'lie back and take it' wing will applaud that
A question regarding the tactical situation.
Not knowing the layout of the building I am wondering if perhaps this doorway might have been the last line of defense before the secure area where the politicians were cowering in fear (and protected by the guns they want to deny us)? The shooting is awful but with a small police force faced by a large mob of unknown intention was it necessary to defend this final choke point with deadly force?
Not sure why this was in a reply to my post as I didn't even discuss these subjects.People that cannot see that antifa is the violence wing of the democratic party and by extension the Chinese communist party have their head in the sand...
If she was that much of a threat she probably would have been dealt with by the 4-5 heavily armed police that were already nearby? Your analysis could very well be true but I still don't think it was necessary at that point.A question regarding the tactical situation.
Not knowing the layout of the building I am wondering if perhaps this doorway might have been the last line of defense before the secure area where the politicians were cowering in fear (and protected by the guns they want to deny us)? The shooting is awful but with a small police force faced by a large mob of unknown intention was it necessary to defend this final choke point with deadly force?
Please point me to my complaint so I can address your concerns.Does anyone here believe that what happened in Minneapolis in any way justified looting and burning and murder in cities X,Y,Z,A,B,C,D,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,T,W,X1,Y1 ...
Maybe shouldn't complain so much when the skirmish is conducted via the RoE that have been set. Too late to retconn the 'mostly peaceful protest' narrative
I want you on my jury if BLM comes to my neighborhoodAside from the deceased not being a minor. There is plenty of justification in shooting a person who breaks a window, and is in the process of jumping through it, to potentially interrupt a legislative session.
Did the shooter (in a suit) even know there was a stack of uniformed officers just down the stairs? Shooter probably could not visually see those armed police and maybe a different jurisdiction without radio communication.If she was that much of a threat she probably would have been dealt with by the 4-5 heavily armed police that were already nearby? Your analysis could very well be true but I still don't think it was necessary at that point.