I think my comment about tools was too brief and therefore came across wrong. Let me try to explain better.
I don't mean that I think of automobiles like I think of an appliance. I have had my washer and dryer for 5 years, and I genuinely don't know what brand they are. If someone switched them out on me overnight, so long as the new ones worked, I wouldn't care.
But I can tell you year, make, and model for all 18 of the cars and the 3 motorcycles I've had (in 19 years of driving).
Like tools, the vehicle I want is the best one for the job I'm trying to accomplish. Like tools, there isn't one that can do every. And like tools, I personally want the latest tech instead of a 50+ year old machine.
Some people have a dream car that they wrench on all the time or that requires a parts car to keep on the road. That's a cool thing, but it's not my thing. I don't want that. (Modifications? Yes. Routine maintenance? Sure. Constant repairs? Hard pass.) My dream car is the one where I can decide to take my wife and dogs and drive to the Arctic Circle, and where that's a reasonable plan.
That's not soulless. That's not missing the point of a dream car discussion. That's just an automotive enthusiast with different priorities. That's an enthusiast who prefers to spend more time on forest roads than running between stop lights--and doesn't want to require a support truck following along.
My example of a Ford FoST isn't a crappy commuter car; it's a turbocharged hot hatch with a manual transmission. It's an enthusiasts' car. My point was that I think modern hot hatches have caught up to supercars of decades past. Several billion dollars spent on engineering will do that. The old cars are undeniably cool. But the features that made them standouts in their time aren't as unreachable as they used to be, and so the limitations are harder for me to ignore.
I have a 1940s Black & Decker handheld drill that belonged to my grandfather. It's still a functional tool. It also hasn't been pulled out of the chest to be used for probably 14 years or more. I pick up one of my cordless options. When using any tool, I get joy more from what I accomplish with it than from the tool itself being cool, rare, good-looking, or nostalgic. The new drills are keyless, portable, and more powerful. The new tools do the same job better, and that's more satisfying to me.
I'm a car guy, too. I have three automobiles (plus a motorcycle) for which I am the primary driver... even though the last time I had to drive anywhere to get to work was in 2007. I like cars. I just happen to value utility and modern safety features over aesthetics and nostalgia.
I define my objective, and then I pick the tool for that job. And I am always more interested in the latest and greatest rather than in continuing to run the option I liked best years ago.
I don't mean to crap on anyone whose fandom is different and drives them to have a different dream car. (Pun intended.) But please don't crap on my fandom, either.
Yup.
Grail car.....
67 vette coup. Dark jade white stinger and rally wheels. BLack guts.
427 tri-power 4 speed with/without side pipes.
Also fan grail car....
69 Camaro COPO.
Coloring I call ick red.
Dog bowls no chrome past bumpers and door handles.
Bare bones base body and the 450 HP 427.
So in my request that we stay in the "Dream"" realm to provide an escape from the madness we are drowning in you give us a full page. But not 1 dream on that page.
My dream car is the one where I can decide to take my wife and dogs and drive to the Arctic Circle, and where that's a reasonable plan.
Have you ever taken a road trip where 400 miles of the journey doesn’t have even gravel on the "roads"?
Why the gatekeeping?
I had a '70 Super Bee, with a 440 magnum, and an auto trans, but my dream car is one I had and let go is a '70 Dodge Charger.......My grail car has always been the 1970 Super Bee with a 440 six pack. I’ve lusted after those since they were on the lot new when I was 7 years old.
A buddy of mine, has two flat fendered Jeeps, uses them as farm vehicles.....Still wanting a Flatty. Will get one eventually.
Been lusting after a Lotus lately. Maybe an Exige?
But, told my wife, if I can ever swing a Unimog DoKa, I'd be daily-driving it
Have you ever taken a road trip where 400 miles of the journey doesn’t have even gravel on the "roads"?
Why the gatekeeping?
One of these would be a dream vehicle for that type of driving.
Or this:
Those look to be well built rigs, but a Ram won't ever be my dream rig. I personally prefer an SUV to a pickup for this kind of build (so long as I get to keep my my current pickup, too, for working). I've had a lot of fun with Jeeps, old Broncos, 4runners, and Land Cruisers. I did a trip in the Andes a few years back where our primary limit was the fuel we could load on the roof before we headed out. Part of our route was, the next week, on the route for the Dakar rally.
I expect the new Bronco to be an even better starting point to build from. https://www.ford.com/suvs/bronco/2021/
1965/1966 Chevy Impala. Not two cars, just one.
Take this 1965 Impala:
And put this 1966 Impala front clip on it:
Original factory green paint color. Black leather interior. I'd keep the front bench seat. I'd keep the original steering wheel, original dash and gauges, original radio, but for God's sake I'd replace the climate control switches with something that looks period but works better. One must have is A/C. Not choppped, not dropped, not shaved, not debadged. No low profile tires. I wouldn't try to cram some giant engine in it. My Impalas have been 283s. I'd be happy with that again.
I know this isn't everyones cup of tea, because it wouldn't be built as a muscle car, but as a mostly period-correct suburban white collar daily driver. For me, it would be a fun cruiser. Me and my wife driving around on the weekend, or maybe going to a little weekend getaway in some small town. Not a drag racer or a burnout maker. Just the best of my favorite two model years.
Oh no no no......I love the 66 on its own but the 65 is my Fav....
When I brought it home.
Same car about $25K later...
I had a 65 SS Impala that I left a my cousins house for a little too long.
He had run into some hard times and sold it to pay the rent.
It was a Green 2 door with buckets, console, a huge vacuum gauge in the dash and a powerglide that was strong in first but I had to really
feather the throttle in second so it did not slip.
I still have the title.
I read CM’s post and figure my cousin saved me $25,000.
There's just something about that side fin that started in 1958 and got smoothed down until it nearly disappeared in 1964, then magically reappeared in 1965 as a hump in the back fender. If you have ever run your hand along the body lines of a fourth generation Impala, you know what I mean. Once you hit that contour, it becomes a nearly sexual experience, like finding the perfect curve of a woman's butt.
I'm partial to the 66, but I do love the 65 rear. I think the easiest route to get both is to put the 66 front clip on the 65 body. I haven't looked very closely, or taken any measurements, but it really looks like the back line of the fenders under the A pillar are either a match or line up very well.
The 65 front just doesn't look right to me. It's the eyebrows. It just makes it look surprised all the time.
The 66, to me, looks like a shark. Not currently eating, but looking for a meal.
I should never have sold this one.