Does one get a pass on criminal activity due to brain damage? I'm not a lawyer but I'm sure that'll be argued in court.
Would not think so with past behavior as a pattern.
Does one get a pass on criminal activity due to brain damage? I'm not a lawyer but I'm sure that'll be argued in court.
Thanks, Jack. Hadn't heard anything further.the grand jury has now refused TWICE to put Landry up for prosecution. The DA is weighing his options at this time.
Thanks, Jack. Hadn't heard anything further.
All that really tells me is the DA should be removed from office for violation of the 'stupidity' clause.
That is why he climbed a locked security gate at 2am in the morning, because he is a good child.
Thanks, Jack. Hadn't heard anything further.
All that really tells me is the DA should be removed from office for violation of the 'stupidity' clause.
They'll say that the kids don't have anything else to do. They'll blame it on poverty. Anything but themselves which is basically the frame of mind and attitude that is being perpetuated from parent to child.
If nothing else, one would hope that the grand jury would end this along with instructing the DA to get his head out from up his ass, especially after the little hoodlum has been rolled up for burglary again. That should effectively dispel the myth that his worst offense in life had been singing too loudly in church.
I agree, but legally this can't be used when considering charges against the homeowner, right? He had no knowledge (as far as we know) about this kid's pastimes. It was the same in the Minnesota case where the homeowner laid in wait for the burglars. The judge didn't let the jury hear of the kids' records who broke into the house because though the homeowner knew there were robberies in the area, including his own home, and anticipated there would be another (which came to pass), he had no knowledge of THOSE kids' past, so that couldn't have informed his decision to take the action he did, and therefore could not be considered by the jury.
I could see it being disallowed as a preemptive defense, but would imagine it would be allowed if the prosecution tried the 'he murdered these poor innocent little saints who never did anything wrong in their lives and were little pillars of the community who accidentally turned on sidewalk too soon' nonsense. Not a lawyer, but I recall having seen examples (of which I don're remember the particulars any more) that in cases where one side could not introduce evidence and the other can, if the side which can opens the can of worms, all the worms are fair game.
Perhaps more important is the fact that a grand jury will not be sequestered and if anyone on it has watched the news or read the paper, while they may not hear the evidence in court, well, what has been seen cannot be unseen.
The "poor little angel" has now been busted for even more crimes than a few days ago, serious ones here...
Marshall Coulter | Merritt Landry | Self-Defense
i can't believe this idiot went right out and burglarized someone again, after being shot in the freaking head. what a winner. i hope those protesters are all hanging their heads in shame over this, but i'm not holding my breath about it.
They are most likely on to the next issue on their worthless and meandering agenda.
true, following one's bleeding heart often leads one astray. lol
I truly believe if you are protesting someone/thing such as this then one of the protesters should take this idiot on and straighten him out. If you are not willing to do this then let it go and pick an issue worth protesting for.