Looking into this, there appears to be something to it. At the worst, Paul wrote these, or approved their publication. At the best, he has finessed the issue.
It appears to me that the most likely scenario is that he turned over responsibility for the newsletters to people he was close to, then when the controversy came he at first doubled down, then backed away and claimed ignorance. The people who likely wrote these things are still close Paul advisors.
From what I can tell, I don't think Paul is a racist, but this issue isn't going away, and I don't think he has a good explanation.
After reviewing this, I think it's likely he's refusing to answer because he knows there's evidence enough to sink him, or he'll have to lie about something where the truth may come out.
This looks legit to me, and if I think so, the MSM is prepping right now.
It appears to me that the most likely scenario is that he turned over responsibility for the newsletters to people he was close to, then when the controversy came he at first doubled down, then backed away and claimed ignorance. The people who likely wrote these things are still close Paul advisors.
From what I can tell, I don't think Paul is a racist, but this issue isn't going away, and I don't think he has a good explanation.
After reviewing this, I think it's likely he's refusing to answer because he knows there's evidence enough to sink him, or he'll have to lie about something where the truth may come out.
This looks legit to me, and if I think so, the MSM is prepping right now.