I could have put this in any number of threads, but:
"In response to Dominion's lawsuit, Powell's attorneys claimed in court filings, citing another case, that "the language of the political arena, like the language used in labor disputes...is often vituperative, abusive and inexact.'"
Powell's counsel went on to assert, "Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support Defendants' position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process."
So we should ask ourselves whether we are reasonable people or not. Sydney Powell's position is that no "reasonable person" would take her election claims as fact.
Attorney Sidney Powell says 'no reasonable person would conclude' her claims about Dominion were facts
She wants the company's defamation lawsuit against her thrown out
www.theblaze.com
"In response to Dominion's lawsuit, Powell's attorneys claimed in court filings, citing another case, that "the language of the political arena, like the language used in labor disputes...is often vituperative, abusive and inexact.'"
Powell's counsel went on to assert, "Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support Defendants' position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process."
So we should ask ourselves whether we are reasonable people or not. Sydney Powell's position is that no "reasonable person" would take her election claims as fact.