Virginia delegates bus ride,rule 16,12,and 40 pass.

[Designer99]

It's not their fault. The teleprompter made them do it...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77W5OKStO5s

This MUST be a fake! Everybody knows that only Obama uses a teleprompter...right?

 

[rambone]

 

[HeadlessRoland]

Bush lost in 1992 because he pandered to the Bradyites and morons of the world.
Romney will lose because he panders to the weak-minded and tyrannical, the easily-suaded and the hopeless.

No matter who takes helm of the Republic, Diocletian has already issued his price and currency edicts.
Our time to pay the price for decades of malfeasance and disrespect for the enunciated boundaries of government is rapidly, swiftly approaching.

This spectacle, this insular circus of censorship, just proves the point.

 

[IndyDave1776]

They can kiss my fat a**. They got their last vote from me in 2008.

 

[smokingman]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aJUnltwsqs&feature=player_embedded

 

[rambone]

You Used to Need Five States to Be Officially Put in Nomination for President at RNC. Ron Paul Gets Six. Rule Change! Now You Need Eight!

Remember all that brouhaha over Ron Paul needing five states to nominate him, according to the old "Rule 40"? Well, today six states (or entities with delegations) tried to nominate him--Nevada, Iowa, Oregon, Minnesota, Alaska and the Virgin Islands.

What happened then? A rule change was adopted saying you need eight. Sorry Ron!

 

[IndyDave1776]

You Used to Need Five States to Be Officially Put in Nomination for President at RNC. Ron Paul Gets Six. Rule Change! Now You Need Eight!

If you can't win playing fair, cheat!

 

[smokingman]

Why not send an email to the 168 men who have taken total control of your voice,your choice,and still want your vote?

Contact Us - GOP

 

[BigMatt]

Why not send an email to the 168 men who have taken total control of your voice,your choice,and still want your vote?

Contact Us - GOP

They will get my feedback in November.

 

[WWIIIDefender]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35OXo9SSj5I&feature=g-all-u

 

[HeadlessRoland]

"Treason is death."

 

[hondatech2k2]

If you can't win playing fair, cheat!

And if you can't cheat, kill the opposition!!

 

[rambone]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=B39W91O-rUg

 

[Ted]

John Sununu was the point man on this endeavor, as he gave his stamp of approval upon the new rules and released them......then promptly leaving the building.

GOP rules require dissent to be delivered within 60 minutes of release.

 

[smokingman]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=B39W91O-rUg

There are many republicans cheering the fall of Ron Paul at the convention.They are going to be sick when the realize they gave up the right to have any voice at the next convention to do it.

The Republican party has totally lost my respect and support.

And I will not vote for the lesser of two evils again.

 

[Ted]

......And I will not vote for the lesser of two evils again.

Then by default, you support the greater of aforementioned evils.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Then by default, you support the greater of aforementioned evils.

How is that? I would say the problem is that there are not enough people standing up in refusal to support any evil. The only reason why good candidates are not viable is that most people either do not want good or they buy into the self-fulfilling prophecy that they are not electable and they do not get elected because the people who claim to want good candidates refuse to support them. It is grossly unfair to declare that because someone supports a good candidate rather than the second-worst candidate that he is automatically supporting the worst.

 

[buckstopshere]

Then by default, you support the greater of aforementioned evils.

Uh, probably not. He could be voting for no evil.

He could be not voting at all.

There are many choices from that statement so I don't see how you can claim the default is voting for more evil.

Is this a creative way of saying if you don't vote for Romney you're voting for Obama?

 

[Ted]

How is that? I would say the problem is that there are not enough people standing up in refusal to support any evil. The only reason why good candidates are not viable is that most people either do not want good or they buy into the self-fulfilling prophecy that they are not electable and they do not get elected because the people who claim to want good candidates refuse to support them. It is grossly unfair to declare that because someone supports a good candidate rather than the second-worst candidate that he is automatically supporting the worst.

Uh, probably not. He could be voting for no evil.

He could be not voting at all.

There are many choices from that statement so I don't see how you can claim the default is voting for more evil.

Is this a creative way of saying if you don't vote for Romney you're voting for Obama?

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." -Edmund Burke

......Or support a cause that is unattainable, that will assist, or even assure that the present evil will flourish.

I don't like Romney all that much, but I dislike Obama that much more.

 

[hornadylnl]

Then by default, you support the greater of aforementioned evils.

Here we go with the INGO GOP race card again.